I grew up on Wyoming’s public lands before I had any notion they belonged to me, or to anyone else.

Opinion

My father worked for Conoco Inc., and like a lot of oil field families, we drifted where the work went. They called families like ours “doodlebuggers,” which sounds almost cheerful until you realize how often it meant uprooting your life and starting over in another patch of windblown Wyoming.

But children adapt easily to movement when the landscape remains familiar.

And Wyoming’s public lands became the constant in my life.

I remember sagebrush seas stretching to the horizon, badlands that looked abandoned by time and enough open country to make a person feel both insignificant and oddly comforted. There was room to hunt, fish, wander, get lost and occasionally become found again.

Not every place in the world works that way. In much of it, land belongs to people with enough money to fence it off and enough lawyers to make sure you stay out. History is full of kings, barons and modern corporations who seem to believe creation was intended as private inventory.

We’ve managed, somehow, to do better here.

At least so far.

I spent most of my life working outdoors, much of it on public lands. In high school, I explored Bureau of Land Management two-tracks and dirt roads on a Bridgestone 90 motorcycle, convinced I was immortal. In college, I worked timber inventory for the U.S. Forest Service and learned quickly that forests are often discussed less as living systems than as board feet and road maintenance costs.

That was my first education in bureaucratic language, words carefully arranged to make destruction sound responsible.

It would not be my last.

Years later, working on habitat projects for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, I became intimately familiar with another favorite term: “mitigation.”

There’s a lovely sterile quality to that word. It sounds clean. Responsible. Reassuring.

What it often means is this: Wildlife loses habitat, industry cashes the check and everyone gathers in a meeting room to congratulate themselves for planting a few shrubs somewhere else.

That may sound cynical.

Spend enough time watching mule deer lose winter range to development and see if optimism remains your default setting.

And yet, I’m not cynical about public lands themselves.

Quite the opposite.

They remain one of the few truly democratic ideas America ever stumbled into. Land where an ordinary person can still walk for miles without asking permission from a corporation, a billionaire or some heir to old money hiding behind a locked gate.

That matters more than most people realize.

I realized how much it meant when I was able to ride with my boss — my mentor — on a pack trip from Big Sandy to Cooke City. 

Lose these lands and Wyoming becomes smaller; not just geographically, but spiritually.

The silence gets bought.

The roads get locked.

And future generations inherit fences where horizons used to be.

That would be one hell of a bad trade.

Dan Stroud has lived in Wyoming all his life. He graduated from Worland High School and has two degrees — a bachelor's in wildlife mgt, and a master's in range management — both from the University...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *