A Teton County Library polling station during the primary election Aug. 18, 2020. (Angus M. Thuermer, Jr./WyoFile)

In Wyoming’s primary election — held Aug. 18 on the 100th anniversary of women’s suffrage and 150 years after Wyoming was first to grant women the right to vote — voters decided that only women will vie for the state’s two open seats in the U.S. Capitol.

Democrat Merav Ben-David faces Republican Cynthia Lummis in the Senate tilt while incumbent GOP member Liz Cheney faces Democratic challenger Lynnette Grey Bull in the House race.

Lummis, who last served as Wyoming’s U.S. representative where she preferred to be called a congressman, acknowledged the historic occasion. “To be the first woman to secure the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate in Wyoming on the same day we celebrate the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment is particularly special,” she wrote in a statement.

Ben-David, a zoology and physiology professor at the University of Wyoming, said she would apply her life’s pursuit of facts to her job if elected to the Senate on Nov. 3.

“I am trained to collect data, not dismiss it,” she wrote in a Wednesday statement. “To listen to opposing viewpoints, not disdain them, and to solve problems, not ignore them.”

Cheney, seeking her third term, touted her association with the current administration. “I know that working with President Trump, we can continue to build on our wide-ranging records of accomplishment and continue to deliver more victories for the people of our state and across the country,” Cheney wrote in a statement.

Support Wyoming photography — donate to WyoFile today

Grey Bull, a member of the Northern Arapaho tribe, criticized Cheney’s ties to the president and invited her to a debate on the Wind River Indian Reservation. “She would witness first-hand how COVID-19 has laid bare the structural inequities for minority communities and low-income families across Wyoming,” Grey Bull wrote in a statement.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *