One way to comprehend the value of Wyoming’s elk, deer and pronghorn is to relate it to the state’s permanent mineral trust fund. 

The corpus of that account, which sits at over $13 billion, is fed by severance taxes on oil, gas and mineral extraction and its investment income funds an impressive share of Wyoming’s government. 

Jake Hochard, a Knobloch associate professor and natural resource economist with the University of Wyoming’s Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources.
Jake Hochard, a Knobloch associate professor and natural resource economist with the University of Wyoming’s Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, poses in his office in February 2026. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

“For wildlife, it’s very similar,” said Jake Hochard, a Knobloch associate professor and natural resource economist with the University of Wyoming’s Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources. “The corpus is that [wildlife] biomass on the landscape. And the return is that we’re able to hunt every year, and we maintain and responsibly manage that value for the future.” 

While the mineral trust fund is financial wealth that creates a financial return, the state’s ungulates are a form of “natural wealth” that create return in “ecosystem services,” Hochard said.  

The collective value of that natural wealth for Wyoming’s three most common ungulate species — elk, mule deer and pronghorn — isn’t trivial. Together, the hundreds of thousands of wild ungulates dwelling across the Equality State’s 62 million acres are worth nearly $6 billion, according to the UW professor.  That’s about the same overall market value as some well-known national businesses, like footwear and clothing companies Crocs and Abercrombie & Fitch. 

Hochard stresses that his research is different from the more common type of economic impact studies that have been conducted, for example, on Wyoming’s hunting and fishing, and broader outdoor recreation industry. While those industries generate billions annually, the associated studies overlook the costs, which is a factor Hochard’s natural wealth estimate takes into account. 

“Wildlife is managed,” Hochard said. “Game and Fish has a budget. That’s not free. Ungulates are hit by vehicles. We’re not just looking at revenue generated or economic impact.”

The $6 billion estimate accounts for overall value added to society and factors in those costs, now and in the years to come. He likened the state’s ungulate populations to a bridge used by vehicles. Both are valuable now, but they also generate value streams for decades into the future. 

“So, if we invest in a migration corridor today,” Hochard said, “that’s going to create some additional value every year going forward.” 

Hochard’s database of valuations for the state’s big three ungulate species is detailed enough that it produces estimates down to the herd level. And it also tracks how values change along with ungulate populations and other factors over time. 

Wyoming’s mule deer and pronghorn numbers, for example, have fallen significantly in recent decades. Elk, though, are the most valuable species and wapiti populations have fared much better — they’re even at nuisance levels in some areas. As a result, overall ungulate values are growing. 

“We’re seeing that the appreciation of value is pretty steady across the state,” Hochard said. 

A group of mule deer in Wyoming.
Mule deer populations that include this group of six above Pinedale in April 2026 are valued statewide at $1.2 billion, according to new University of Wyoming research. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

According to the most recent estimate, Wyoming’s elk are valued at $3.9 billion, mule deer at $1.2 billion and pronghorn at $916 million. So far, values have held up better than populations. Over a recent span that mule deer populations struggled and fell by more than half, values declined by only 6%. 

In some cases, steady population declines aren’t abrupt enough to halt appreciation. The historically significant Jackson Elk Herd is one example: Over a recent roughly two-decade period, the crown jewel herd fell in population by 32%, but the value of the herd as an asset grew by 25%, from $104 million to $131 million. 

Values of the Jackson Elk Herd, in red, have risen over decades while the herd’s population has declined. (Jake Hochard)

Hochard plans to introduce his valuations on Wyoming elk, mule deer and pronghorn to a broad audience at the National Assembly of Sportsmen’s Caucuses conference in Oklahoma City this December. If a peer-review process goes smoothly, he’ll also make a portal of his valuation data public around that time. 

Much sooner, Hochard is sharing his research with the Wyoming Game and Fish Commission. He’s scheduled to present at 3 p.m. Monday at the commission’s meeting in Evanston. Readers can tune in remotely via Zoom.

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *