Opinion

When I was a kid, I never thought much about an allowance. I knew my parents had a hard time getting by, so they didn’t have any spare change for me. I also knew my father, under the thumb of his bosses at work, was in charge at home. If I needed money, I had to ask. Usually he said no, and that was that.

As parents, we gave our daughter an allowance, believing it was a way to help her learn to make decisions and live with them. The money wasn’t tied to specific chores — if you clean your room, you can have a cookie; if you help with the yard work, you’ll get 50 cents; if you’re polite to your cranky auntie, we’ll slip a dollar your way. We wanted to avoid teaching bribery as the way of the world.

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary’s first definition of bribe is, “money or favor given or promised in order to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust.” Stopped by the highway patrol, the driver attempted to bribe the officer to avoid getting a speeding ticket. The father bribed his daughter with candy to finish her homework.

At the recent Republican National Committee’s midterm convention, President Trump pledged to give $5,000 to each of the nation’s 270 million adult citizens if Republicans keep control of both the House and Senate in the upcoming elections. The president called his pledge a “Trump dividend” to be given as a result of the administration’s “tremendous economic success.” He compared it to the cash dividends corporations pay to shareholders. As if being a citizen is being a shareholder and as if the nation is a corporation. He also noted that the $5,000 could only be spent within the country. How you gonna police that one?

It’s estimated that the total of the $5,000 payments would add up to about $1.2 trillion. Where would that money come from? The president has said there’d be no need to use tax funds, that some of the money could come from the $100,000 fee he’s demanding of visa applicants and some from the profits from tariffs. He claimed the country has taken in “trillions of dollars in tariffs and other things.”

Treasury Department data cited by the Bipartisan Policy Center shows that tariffs have provided about $341 billion in net revenue, $166 billion of which the Supreme Court has ordered to be refunded. The remaining $175 billion is 14.6% of the $1.2 trillion needed to pay us each $5,000.

George Washington University law professor Paul Berman has commented that even if there were enough tariff revenue to cover the cost, “that’s money that goes back to the public fisc,” that is, back to the total pool of money the government holds and manages. Brennan emphasized that the president can’t unilaterally make such payments, as Congress holds the power to appropriate funds. The executive branch can’t spend public money without approval from Congress. 

While many commentators have weighed in on the president’s proposal, few have said out loud what the proposal is — a bribe. In offering each adult citizen $5,000 if Republicans maintain control of Congress in the upcoming elections, the president has made what is typically understood as the classic form of bribery — the payment of money or anything of value or the offer of such payment in exchange for casting or withholding a vote. By federal law, such a promise or payment is illegal.

State law also prohibits bribery. Title 6, Chapter 5, Article 1, Section 6-5-102 of the Wyoming statutes states that a person commits bribery if, “He offers, confers or agrees to confer any pecuniary benefit, testimonial, privilege or personal advantage upon a public servant as consideration for the public servant’s vote, exercise of discretion or other action in his official capacity; or, while a public servant, he solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit, testimonial, privilege or personal advantage upon an agreement or understanding that his vote, exercise of discretion or other action as a public servant will thereby be influenced.”

We commonly think of an individual bribing an elected official — a public servant. But President Trump’s proposal turns things upside down. He is the individual offering the bribe, and we are all public servants sworn in our official capacity to uphold democracy. As such, we must not sell our votes.

In Wyoming, the punishment for a bribery conviction is imprisonment for not more than 10 years, a fine of not more than $5,000, or both. If convicted, I can use the president’s $5,000 check to pay my $5,000 fine. The prison time’s another matter.

After 10 years teaching in Artist-in-Schools programs throughout the western United States, David Romtvedt served for 22 years as a professor at the University of Wyoming.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *