A church facing demands to leave the Wind River Indian Reservation after its pastor delivered a sermon urging Native congregants to renounce Northern Arapaho traditions has a formidable ally in its corner as tensions continue to simmer. 

Last month, the Foundations for Nations church lodged a complaint with state and federal agencies against the Food Bank of Wyoming, alleging the organization unlawfully cut off its support on the basis of religious, political and racial discrimination. According to Foundations For Nations Pastor Sarah Lucas, Food Bank of Wyoming ended the partnership after her controversial sermon, telling her that it was in response to a call claiming her message was discriminatory, the Ranger reported

Foundations for Nations church had the help of a legal group that has litigated cases across the nation involving religious belief. Liberty Counsel, a Florida-based Christian legal nonprofit, filed the complaint on the church’s behalf. The group was founded by conservative activist Mathew Staver, an attorney and former dean at Liberty University School of Law, and his wife, Anita. Before going to law school, Staver pastored several churches, according to his website bio. 

“We focus on three primary areas of life, religious freedom and the family,” said Richard Mast, senior litigation counsel with Liberty Counsel.  

Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis, center, with Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, left, and attorney Mat Staver, right, founder of the Liberty Counsel, the Christian law firm representing Davis, at her side, greets the crowd after being released from the Carter County Detention Center, Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2015, in Grayson, Ky. Davis, the Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for refusing to issue marriage licenses to gay couples, was released Tuesday after five days behind bars. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley)

A network of Christians, attorneys and churches alerted the organization to Foundations for Nations’ situation, Mast told WyoFile. Liberty Counsel is providing legal services to the church for free. “I’m hopeful that this is close to being amicably resolved, and everyone will continue living their lives,” Mast said. 

Liberty Counsel has taken on cases across the country in the name of religious freedom, including some that have landed before the U.S. Supreme Court. Many of these cases have dealt with abortion and LGBTQ matters

In the 1994 case Madsen v. Women’s Health Center, Inc., for example, the organization successfully challenged parts of a city of Melbourne, Florida ordinance imposing 300-foot buffer zones around abortion clinics and requiring that demonstrators get permission to talk to people connected with such clinics. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the buffer zones and a ban against images that could be seen from inside the clinic.

Liberty Counsel also successfully defended a Kentucky clerk from lawsuits filed against her after she refused to sign her name to marriage certificates following the U.S. Supreme Court’s legalization of same-sex marriage nationwide. Across the country, the group has also pushed back on “conversion therapy” bans, arguing that such bans violate free speech and religious freedom rights. 

For Liberty Counsel, the Foundations for Nations’ conflict also ties to free speech and religious freedom concerns, Mast said. “Even though it might be offensive speech to some, we still have the right to say it, and people should not try to cancel others because of their faith,” he said of Lucas’ sermon and the resulting fallout from her message. 

Sarah Lucas, pastor of the Foundations for Nations church, is interviewed in Arapahoe on Monday, Aug. 17, 2026. (Thomas Peipert/AP Photo)

The organization has the help of “affiliated attorneys” who are on the ground in Wyoming. “When a matter arises in their local area, we reach out to them, offer them an opportunity to participate, and we are frequently taken up on that,” Mast said. “We appreciate our local counsel in Wyoming.” 

Liberty Counsel has previously taken on other Wyoming cases, Mast said. “People have reached out to us from Wyoming. We’ve come to their assistance, and at least one of those cases I recall was successful,” he said. The Wyoming cases he has been involved with were “privately resolved without public fanfare.” 

“I’m not at liberty to share what those cases are because of client privacy rights,” Mast said. 

The group has also dealt with Native American law matters before, though this will be the first time the group has undertaken a matter involving the Northern Arapaho tribe, Mast said. 

In addition to filing the discrimination complaint, Liberty Counsel sent a letter to Northern Arapaho Business Council Chairman Keenan Groesbeck in July after the council had adopted a resolution stating that outside organizations should consult with the council before initiating or expanding recurring organized activities on lands governed by the Northern Arapaho Tribe. While stating that the church believes it’s in compliance with the resolution, the letter asserted that the church “requires no authorization” from the Northern Arapaho Business Council “to conduct religious activities on its own private fee simple property,” and that the church “will not be leaving its property.” 

Following Lucas’ sermon, the Northern Arapaho Business Council told church officials to leave the reservation, and some called on the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone tribes to use the “bad men” clause in their treaties with the U.S. government to oust the church from the reservation. But in an Aug. 31 resolution, the Northern Arapaho Business Council stated that it doesn’t regulate activities on the church’s private property, and that it hadn’t designated the church or any person as “bad men.”

Maya Shimizu Harris covers public safety for WyoFile. She was previously a freelance writer and the state politics reporter for the Casper Star-Tribune.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *