Big Top Circus Tents. (Brecht Bug/FlickrCC)

Election Day is upon us. Today, Nov. 8, we will cast our votes and choose a new cadre of elected officials. There are not likely to be many surprises here in Wyoming. For all but a handful of races, the results are all but certain. Wyoming will again have Republican supermajorities in both chambers of the Legislature; an all-Republican federal delegation; and, almost certainly, Republicans in each of the five statewide elected offices. Suffice it to say that Wyoming Republicans will have a pretty good day.

Opinion

However, we Republicans must remember that just because things are going well now, that does not mean they will continue that way forever. In the recent past, Colorado and Arizona were reliable Republican states. That is no longer true. The Republican Party in those states lost touch with the average voter. Now Colorado leans Democratic while Arizona is a toss-up. Although Wyoming has a long way to go before that happens, leaders in Arizona and Colorado likely thought the same before their states shifted.  

If we are to maintain our majority status, Republicans must make sure that voters feel that their voice is heard in the Republican Party. Political affiliations are sticky things. Once someone identifies with a political party, it is hard to dislodge them. If a political party fails to recruit members when voters first “choose their team,” it is unlikely to remain a viable party. The flip side of the coin is also true: Even though it is difficult to change a voter’s partisan identity, once it does happen, that voter is unlikely to ever change back. A Republican who has left the party is very unlikely to ever identify as a Republican again.  

This means that Republicans must be ever mindful to attract new members and avoid alienating existing members. If we fail to do this, we risk becoming a permanent minority party. The “big tent” party that Ronald Reagan spoke of is not just a pleasant phrase — it is political necessity.  

Unfortunately, many Republicans seem to have forgotten this. There is increased insistence on ideological purity and little tolerance for dissent or opposing views. There is a significant risk that the Republican Party becomes a party based solely on a single point of view. While this sounds appealing at first glance, it would be disastrous for the party long-term.  

American political parties are coalitions of groups that are generally aligned on policy, although not always and not on everything. Historically, there has been debate and negotiation within political parties among different schools of thought. In the Republican Party, libertarians, business-first conservatives and religious voters have had aligned viewpoints when it came to communism or collectivism, but very different viewpoints on social issues. This was a good thing. Voters of varying viewpoints came together to support a broad-based party, resulting in both a more responsive party and a party with a better chance to win elections.  

This arrangement is not without its frustrations, especially in a closely divided country. Debates within the party do not always result in everyone closing ranks. Close votes may fail due to a party’s elected officials failing to vote for their party’s preferred policy. Republican voters are understandably upset when their legislation fails because of Republican officials voting against it. A more homogenous party is very appealing in those moments, and the temptation to try to force out the dissenters is strong.

Republicans must be ever mindful to attract new members and avoid alienating existing members. If we fail to do this, we risk becoming a permanent minority party.

However, the alternative is an unresponsive party likely to bleed voters over time. A party with a sole viewpoint is unlikely to be able to speak to a majority of voters. Under the “big tent,” a voter may not agree 100% of the time, but they see enough people like them, and agree often enough, that they are willing to adopt the party label and cast their support and votes for the party’s candidates. If they hear enough voices like theirs, even if their view is not the majority, they feel welcome. A party with a single point of view is unlikely to keep those voters. If the only viewpoint expressed is one different from their own, they will seek other parties and candidates to support, or find that they support none of them. We must remember that while a Republican coalition is likely to reach a majority of the American people, any individual wing of our party is not.

This is my fear for the Republican Party. If we do not ensure that our party has room for a variety of viewpoints, we risk losing the future. A win today is a good thing, but it must be followed by further wins in the future if our party is to accomplish its goals. We must remain a big tent party if we are going to continue to have election days like we will have this week.  Otherwise, we should savor the victory now — as we are unlikely to see many more.

Khale Lenhart

Cheyenne attorney Khale Lenhart is a former chairman of the Laramie County Republican Party. He can be reached at khale.lenhart@gmail.com

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Translation – Angry old white people are dying everyday and the WY GOP better mend its ways or no young people will stay in Wyoming to even dig their graves. On the flip side moderate republicans can clearly see that Wyoming Democrats are sane and some may see that swapping parties may stop the hemorrhaging of the future citizens of Wyoming.

  2. A big-tent promises nothing in terms of election results. The Democratic party has shown how difficult it is to manage a big-tent party.

    Wyoming might get few more DINOs and RINOs elected to high office with a more-welcoming Republican message but that is unlikely to change the overall direction of conservative governance.

    Beware of a stew instead of a sizzling steak, especially nationally, especially on messaging.

  3. Both parties have been destroyed by dark and corporate pay to play money, evangelic and environgelic extremism that’s loved by shallow media. This will always be known as a sad commentary on the boomer generation. Citizens United destroyed the politics of yore.

  4. Funny things tents are…… No solid foundations to speak of and very easily rattled and raised by the slightest puff of hot air……

  5. The Republican Party is too far gone. You all embraced white supremacy and have shown us you’d rather let us die than see a doctor, that women should be treated like chattel property and allowed to die and be killed rather than getting an abortion, and on top of that your party participated in and continues to participate in a coup attempt to overthrow our democracy, your party attacked our capital. No this party is the party of authoritarianism, which can only be defeated. Decent actual conservatives need to look elsewhere for a home, there is no tent anymore with the Republicans, just a looney bin of hate, racism, and cruelty.

  6. I would say the tent may need to be “bigger” because part of the reason for the division is that some Republican Elected’s philosophy could not be distinguished from the Democrat Tent.

    1. The claim of RINO is used by those who are the reason for the downward spiral of the gullible old party…

  7. The Republican party no longer speaks for me. If the tent doesn’t get vastly larger, I am gone. The pendulum has swung too far to the right by far.