Elk follow a hay wagon as feed is spread out at a Game and Fish feedground. (Mark Gocke/Wyoming Game and Fish Department)
Share this:

Chronic wasting disease prions that bind with soil and grass are accumulating in Wyoming-run feedgrounds, contaminating sites that have provided refuge for slews of close-packed elk each winter for generations. 

“We knew it was an eventuality, but it’s absolutely concerning,” said Justin Binfet, deputy chief of wildlife for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. “With every positive [elk] that’s out there, they’re starting to contaminate those feedgrounds more and more.”

In January, Game and Fish reported its unwelcome first case of the infectious disease inside an elk feedground — the Scab Creek unit southeast of Pinedale. Then late last week, the agency sent word of its second and third cases, both detected in cow elk carcasses at the Dell Creek Feedground in the Hoback River basin. As the nearly indestructible prions pile up, they have the potential to inflame CWD’s spread, collapsing western Wyoming’s six feedground-dependent elk herds in the process. 

A recent U.S. Geological Survey study, in fact, anticipates that very outcome. 

Although there’s a propensity to “crystal ball it,” Binfet said, nobody knows exactly what’s about to happen. Game and Fish has a good feel for CWD transmission dynamics and prevalence in elk herds in the eastern part of the state, where it’s existed since 1986 and where elk also gather in large numbers. There, where there’s no feeding, the disease hasn’t had a devastating effect on elk, unlike what’s happened in some Wyoming mule deer herds

Elk are strung out on the Dell Creek Feedground on a snowy morning in February 2025. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

But there are many questions, Binfet said, about how the disease will behave and propagate in western Wyoming where elk are being fed and concentrated, year-in and year-out, on the same relatively small plots of land. 

“Having these 22 state-run feedgrounds and then the National Elk Refuge, that’s going to certainly put the transmission potential at an unprecedented [level],” he said. 

For decades, scientists and game managers have discussed the risks of what could come only in the hypothetical: CWD hadn’t yet reached the feedgrounds and their super-concentrated elk, which are generally more prone to infecting each other with an array of diseases. The first case within Northwest Wyoming’s feedground region was logged in the Jackson Herd in 2020, and the disease subsequently showed up in the Pinedale, Piney and Fall Creek herds. The two infected animals found dead at the Dell Creek Feedground mark the malady’s first known occurrence in the Upper Green River Elk Herd, meaning that five of the six feedground-dependent elk herds now harbor the disease. Only the Afton Elk Herd is yet to have its first case of CWD discovered. Altogether, the region is home to a combined 20,000-plus elk.  

State biologists and wardens aren’t being caught entirely on their heels by the arrival of a disease that threatens to reshape western Wyoming’s elk herds. Last March, the Wyoming Game and Fish Commission signed off on the state agency’s first-ever elk feedground management plan. That plan, however, does not authorize wildlife managers to adapt feeding as they see fit without consensus from ranchers, outfitters and the highest levels of state government. Feedground closures, in fact, even require gubernatorial support because of intervention from the Wyoming Legislature.

Under the feeding plan, elk herds will be reviewed two at a time for the next three years. First up in 2025 are the Pinedale and Jackson Herds, out of which will come herd-specific “feedground management action plans.” 

Stacked and fenced hay stored to feed elk on the Dell Creek Feedground is pictured here in December 2023. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

Review of feeding operations at the Dell Creek Feedground, where CWD recently killed two cows, could still be years away, but that doesn’t altogether negate any type of immediate management response. 

“Especially now, we’re going to renew conversations with feeders to keep an extra-vigilant eye out,” Binfet said. 

Sick-looking elk, he said, can and will be killed and tested as a precaution. Wyoming’s elk feeding management plan calls for developing a “carcass removal and disposal” protocol at each feedground.

The carcasses of the two CWD-stricken cows from the Dell Creek Feedground were taken to the dump, Binfet said.

“We are also exploring the possibility of getting some large dumpsters,” Binfet said. “But, depending on where these feedgrounds are [located], logistically it’s quite a challenge to get these elk out.” 

On the National Elk Refuge, where the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is also planning for CWD’s arrival, managers dispose of animals via a diesel-fueled incinerator

The Dell Creek Feedground in recent winters has attracted an average of 571 elk, significantly more than the 400-animal quota, according to the state’s management plan. The 32.5-acre site is located on the Bridger-Teton National Forest and feeding operations occur there under a permit, but not without controversy. 

An aerial view of the Dell Creek Feedground, located on the Bridger-Teton National Forest at the foot of the Gros Ventre Range. (Bridger-Teton National Forest)

Four years ago, the Sierra Club, Western Watersheds Project, Wyoming Wildlife Advocates and Gallatin Wildlife Association sued the U.S. Forest Service, and won, after challenging how the federal agency was authorizing elk feeding on the site near Bondurant. Operations have depended on temporary single-year permits ever since, though the Forest Service has started preparing an environmental impact statement that could OK continued feeding for the next two decades. 

The draft of that plan considered four scenarios: continuing to feed elk per the status quo, denying the permit immediately, allowing a three-year phase-out, and allowing feeding only on an emergency basis in severe winters. Additional options might be included in the final EIS, which the state is still awaiting, Binfet said.

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Join the Conversation

25 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Elk will congregate and concentrate every winter, REGARDLESS of whether they are at a feed ground or not.

    This is a scare tactic to continually diminish elk herds in the GYE.

  2. There has been success with large predators taking out the sick before they even show signs of the disease and putting them in a dump where birds and such will eat on them can spread it even faster. Also in area where there are wild horses they can eat the infected grasses and not get it or spread it. So maybe expanding wild horses into some of there areas would help.

  3. For decades wildlife scientists and conservationists warned this was inevitable and offered solutions that phased out feedgrounds, and protected wildlife, hunting, and ranching. And now all the wildlife managers can offer is they’re concerned, they’ll discuss it with the folks hired to spread hay, shoot every sickly elk, and maybe buy dumpsters. Seems a waste of education, training, experience, and wildlife.

  4. The only way to defeat this disease is to allow mother nature to take her course and let the big game develop a natural immunity to CWD. I see no other way, based on how long the prions stay in the soil and flora. Hopefully, the powers that be also see this as an end to the struggle and manage our big game accordingly.
    Attempting to kill CWD by killing more elk (and especially deer) has proven over and over that we will not rid ourselves of the disease by these efforts. I don’t know what the answer is, but in Wisconsin some years back, all it did was wipe out the deer herds (whitetail). The deer were dead either way. Now Colorado is trying the same thing with the mule deer. Killing more deer to keep them from dying. Seems contradictory. At the very least.

    Our elk herds are above herd objectives in many areas. In my opinion, this is not in our mule deer’s best interest. Elk often times displace mule deer, making them occupy less desirable fawning grounds, etc., and in turn more susceptible to predation.

    Further, in instances where CWD has been bad, deer are still surviving there. Maybe not thriving but still surviving. Does this mean they are perhaps developing an immunity to CWD? I think so. Why can’t elk do the same? Since CWD has been detected in out eastern Wyoming elk 40 years ago, why hasn’t it wiped out the elk over there? Are they developing an immunity? Good chance of that. Maybe Mother Nature actually knows better than us.

    Hopefully we don’t start killing all our big game for the sake of saving them from CWD.

    1. I recollect a project done at Sibylle a while back where bobcats were fed CWD infected meat. The prions didn’t affect them and by measuring prions in scat, there were indications that this might be a possible way to at least slow down the spread.
      If the answer is to let nature take its course, that should mean leaving bobcats, mountain lions, coyotes, wolves and bears alone.

    2. I live in South Central Wisconsin and have been deer hunting here for 55 years. Nobody ” wiped out” our deer herd and we’ve successfully introduced Elk into new areas. I have had 100% success filling at least one of the 4-6 tags we get every season. Killed my buck Nov 7th of the Archery season.

  5. Instead of running over and killing wolves, they can play an important ecological role in helping to control CWD. Elk feedlots should be eliminated.

    1. Wolves are also super spreaders of the CWD problems along with Grizzles when they are relocated, research it

      1. that’s not correct. perhaps you should research it?

        https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=do+wolves+spread+CWD

        https://ricklamplugh.blogspot.com/2020/02/correcting-misinformation-about-wolves.html

        https://wildlifecoexistence.org/blog/wolves-and-chronic-wasting-disease/#:~:text=Another%20benefit%20of%20wolves%20is,without%20increasing%20the%20infection%20rate.

        an excerpt from the article linked above:

        “Another benefit of wolves is that they cannot be infected by CWD. This means that when wolves consume infected animals, they consume the prions without increasing the infection rate. Although their feces still carry the infected prions, research suggests that these prions may begin to break down in a predator’s digestive tract, aiding in their removal. “

  6. And all the while that this is happening, our new “wildlife expert” in the Wyoming House of Representatives, former and disgraced Wyoming Game and Fish Commissioner Mike Schmid and his family members, continue to spread false narratives to prevent the implementation of the Wyoming CWD Management Plan. I commend Governor Gordon for removing Schmid from the Commission because as Gov. Gordon stated “(he) unfortunately exhibited a pattern of actions and statements that undermined the decisions and effectiveness of the board.” Schimd’s actions and statements as a member of the legislature, in my opinion, continue to undermine the decisions and effectiveness of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. Let’s also not forget that this is the same Mike Schmid that joined thousands of other low-life Republican thugs, including now Senator Boulder Bob Ide, in the violent and deadly attack and insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

    1. I thought this discussion was about CWD. Not about trying to disgrace someone’s reputation. Some people just can’t leave well enough alone.

      My bad.

      1. Spoken like a Mike Schmid fan and presumably another MAGA Republican. I served for over a year on the WGFD CWD Working Group with Schmid and about forty other individuals from throughout Wyoming to develop the current approved CWD Management Plan. I witnessed first-hand Schmid’s devisive and disruptive tactics to prevent the CWD plan from being implemented, not only in our working group but also in Schmid’s position as a Commissioner. If anyone is responsible for disgracing Schmid’s reputation, he’s done it all on his own.

        1. Congratulations to Mike. Don’t know the man, but I’m glad someone has enough sense to question the agenda. Sorry to disappoint you, but I’m not a republican. But I am a realist, and I abhor politics. Why must you feel the need to bring politics into every discussion? Without question, that is you, Mr. Lawson.

    2. Bruce, I have always found it interesting that when us republican thugs have thoughts or opinions we address the actual item of discussion. We don’t make personal attacks on anyone based on their opinions or beliefs. Everyone is entitled to their opinions. I truly don’t understand the individualized attacks on people.

  7. Good article, the biologists should be working on a vaccine or some way of stopping this disease also is it possible that the ground that the Hay is being placed on might be infected being should the hay be placed in other area at the feeding location? I have 2 thoughts 1 is CWD a recient disease and needs to be treated as any other infection? And 2 is the location of feeding the Elk a cause, not saying total relocation but moving hay 20 yards and in the spring consider spraying or even dusting ground with Lime ? Finally Man has with westward expansion of the last 150 years has pushed Elk into the mountains were they still a Plains animal maybe CWD would not be an issue.

  8. I don’t believe it, in fact it’s come out from other biologists that CWD is another piece of government propaganda just like the invasive species scare and the charging a fee for the Prevention of such. By the way how is it that thousands of ducks can fly from pond to pond ,state to state ,etc without cleaning and drying thier feet..lol

  9. I and others have been pushing G&F for over 25 years to close feedgrounds to prevent this from happening. Now that it’s happening, we’re even closer to running our elk over the cliff. Yet all we get from G&F is “adaptive management” and “phasing” operations, pushing the only true option–closing feedgrounds–further and further into the future. On top of that, everything G&F does is subject to ranchers and outfitters’ approval or veto. These private industries have no right whatsoever to control wildlife for their own benefit.

    I call this criminal negligence on the part of G&F. It’s time to sue G&F to try and force feedground closure under the state’s public trust responsibilities to protect our wildlife resources from unnecessary risk as well as to prevent private control of our public wildlife.