Failed amendments required UW deans to meet with legislature

— February 19, 2014

Next UW President to Inherit Upgraded Campus, Downgraded Budget — University of Wyoming campus. (Courtesy University of Wyoming)

Both houses of the Wyoming legislature have introduced two identical amendments to the budget bill that would require University of Wyoming deans to meet with standing legislative committees.

Update: Both of the amendments failed to pass during debate on February 19.

House amendment 54 and Senate amendment 44 both would assign joint interim standing committees to meet with each of the colleges at the university, which include Arts and Sciences, Engineering, Business, and others. Membership of the committees would be decided by the Speaker of the House and the Senate President.

The amendments would have the deans meet with the legislative committees, “to discuss areas of mutual concern and ways in which their educational mission can be enhanced.” In an initial meeting, the deans and committee members would identify, “specific courses of action which the college will take to improve its educational mission within each area of concern.” Following that, the deans would report to the committees twice a year to provide updates to legislators on the action items.

Senate sponsors of the amendments included Senate majority floor leader Phil Nicholas (R-Laramie), Sen. Hank Coe (R-Cody), and Senate president Tony Ross (R-Cheyenne). Sponsors from the House included Rep. Glen Moniz (R-Laramie), House Speaker Rep. Tom Lubnau (R-Gillette), and majority floor leader Rep. Kermit Brown (R-Laramie).

University of Wyoming spokesman Chad Baldwin released the following statement in response to concerns over the amendments circulating on the university’s faculty email list:

“Rest assured, the university’s representatives at the Legislature are working to convince lawmakers that this proposed House amendment, and a similar one in the Senate, are not in the best interest of the state and the university.
“It’s not unreasonable for the Legislature to desire more information regarding the activities of UW’s academic units, but these proposed amendments go too far, with the potential of disrupting the established leadership structure of the university.
“The university’s position is that while it has an obligation to maintain strong communication with the Legislature, individual college deans should not report directly to legislative committees, and legislative committees should not have approval authority over academic programs.
“These amendments are two of several proposed by lawmakers that would affect UW, as the state budget bill is considered in the House and Senate. UW’s representatives are actively engaged in the process to advocate for those proposals that would benefit the university, and to oppose those that are not in its interests. The budget bill won’t be in final form until a conference committee of the House and Senate meets next week.”
UW employees and students are encouraged to follow the legislative process, and we will do our best to keep the university community updated on matters of significance to UW.

The text of House Amendment 44/Senate Amendment 54 is below:

Page 177-after line 17  Insert the following new section and renumber as necessary:
“[UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING DEANS-COLLABORATION WITH LEGISLATURE]
     Section 334.
     (a)  The president of the senate and speaker of the house of representatives shall assign a joint interim standing committee to each of the colleges at the University of Wyoming.  The dean of each college shall meet with the standing committee to which their college has been assigned to discuss areas of mutual concern and ways in which their educational mission can be enhanced.  The meeting shall take place at the joint interim committee’s first scheduled interim meeting after the effective date of this section.  On or before September 1^,2014 and September 1, 2015, each college shall submit a plan to the standing committee to which it is assigned which addresses the areas of mutual concern discussed with the standing committee and which identifies specific courses of action which the college will take to improve its educational mission within each area of concern.  After approval of the college’s plan by the standing committee, the college shall provide a report to the standing committee on the actions it has taken to implement the plan two (2) times per year.  The first report shall be made on or before January 1^st and the second report shall be made on or before June 30th.
     (b)  This section is effective immediately.”.
To the extent required by this amendment:  adjust totals; and renumber as necessary.  MONIZ, BROWN, LUBNAU

— Gregory Nickerson is the government and policy reporter for WyoFile. He writes the Capitol Beat blog. Contact him at greg@wyofile.com.

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for:

Your real name — first and last.
Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
No more than three comments per story, including replies.

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
Comments that are not directly relevant to the article.
Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know:

Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.
We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance.
Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you.

Failed amendments required UW deans to meet with legislature

Gregory Nickerson

Leave a comment