In a rarely documented occurrence, an avalanche killed a radio-collared wolf in Yellowstone National Park in 2014.

The avalanche killed a pup belonging to the 8-Mile Pack on Feb. 14 last year, according to an annual report on 2014 wolf activities. Yellowstone released the document Wednesday, reporting at least 104 wolves in 11 packs, including 9 breeding pairs a year ago.

Biologists were not immediately available to comment on how rare such an avalanche death is. Snowslides are a mountain hazard and have been known to kill elk, deer and other alpine-dwelling species.

Mortality tables in annual reports dating back to the original wolf transplant to Yellowstone in 1995 list no other avalanche as a cause of death of a wolf. Many wolves have died of unspecified natural causes, however.

The fact that the pup was collared with a locating device may have contributed to biologists understanding the circumstances of its fate. Four other radio-collared wolves from Yellowstone died in 2014.

Two of those were “harvested” or killed by hunters outside the park. Another wolf was killed by others of its species, and one pup from Mollie’s Pack died while being captured, likely for research.

Researchers captured and handled 16 Yellowstone wolves last year, including the Mollie’s pup, the 8-page report says.

In 2003 there were almost 180 wolves in the world’s first national park — a high mark. Since 2009 the population has hovered around 100.

Wolf numbers in Yellowstone National Park have hovered around 100 animals in recent years. (Yellowstone National Park)
Wolf numbers in Yellowstone National Park have hovered around 100 animals in recent years. (Yellowstone National Park)

In 2014, 40 pups survived until year’s end. In a stable population, that would mean a similar number of adults died that year. The numbers show the limits of mortality data researchers have for park wolves.

The overall population is up from 2013 and also from 2012, when there were only 83 wolves in Yellowstone. The year 2012 was the population nadir since 1999, a graph in the report shows.

Biologists used genetic sampling from scat at a den site for the first time to estimate the size of a wolf pack.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. It is no wonder you guys think there are a lot of wolves in the GYES if you think that critter pictured is a wolf pup!!!

    Dennis Darr

    Reply
  2. Reply