Barrasso questions Reid’s tirade against commissioner

By Hannah Northey, E&E reporter, published 

REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION FROM ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY PUBLISHING, LLC. NOT FOR REPUBLICATION BY WYOMING MEDIA.

Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) today cast a critical eye on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) recent tirade against a Democratic member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, saying he wouldn’t use such aggressive language.

In an interview published yesterday in The Huffington Post, Reid called NRC Commissioner William Magwood a “shit-stirrer” and a “treacherous, miserable liar” and accused him of lying about his willingness to oppose a nuclear repository under Yucca Mountain in Nevada (E&ENews PM, July 30).”My wife said I can’t use the word ‘liar’; she’s really specific about that,” Barrasso said today during an energy event in Washington, D.C. “I can’t say any of those things, but Harry Reid, here he is” using such language.

Sen. John Barrasso
Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyoming)

Reid accused Magwood of trying to oust former NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko, who stepped down abruptly in May. Magwood has not addressed the senator’s remarks. Jaczko has since been replaced by Allison Macfarlane, a Democrat, who will fulfill the remainder of his term through June 2013. Jaczko resigned amid accusations that he had mismanaged the agency and berated employees, allegations that the former chairman denied.

Barrasso, who has criticized Jaczko, said he was surprised by the resignation and that Republican NRC Commissioner Kristine Svinicki was reconfirmed for a second five-year term.

“I wouldn’t have imagined four months ago Jaczko would be out and Svinicki would be back on for a full five years,” Barrasso said. “That worked well; we’ll just have to check and see how Macfarlane does in her new job as a one-year appointment.”

Macfarlane will likely be reappointed to a full five-year term as chairwoman if President Obama is re-elected, but another candidate will be chosen if a Republican candidate wins the election this fall, Barrasso said.

Barrasso said ongoing public spats at the NRC have only added to uncertainty facing the nuclear industry, made worse by a complex set of federal energy regulations that continue to change. New regulations are currently coming down from the NRC, which is revamping safety rules for nuclear reactors in the wake of Japan’s nuclear disaster last year. The EPA is also imposing new clean air and water rules that could affect whether operators will be forced to build new cooling towers.

“In terms of regulations, it’s an alphabet soup of having to deal with the NRC, the EPA, the BLM, the DOE — just one after another after another — and they keep changing the rules,” Barrasso said. “There’s just no predictability out there.”

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *