A hunter glasses for mule deer in southwest Wyoming. “The hardest part of hunting these animals, a lot of the time, is just being able to find them,” said Buzz Hettick of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers. A bill that would ban the sale of animal location GPS data seeks to preserve that challenge. (Steven Brutger)

GPS technology has revolutionized wildlife science. It’s also created a market for those wanting to nab a trophy buck without hours of scouting.

Websites selling location data for specific animals started popping up a couple of years ago, said Brian Nesvik, chief game warden of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. Some sell maps, data and photos for a set price. Others auction locations of trophy game animals to the highest bidder. And some act as a broker between people selling information and those looking to buy.

“It’s become another way to commercialize wildlife without any type of license or regulation,” Nesvik said.

A proposed law would end that practice. The Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources Committee sponsored two bills dealing with GPS data and wildlife. Both will be considered by the full legislature in the upcoming budget session.

HB-5 bans selling trophy game location data and information to hunters. HB-6 allows state agencies, like Wyoming Game and Fish, to keep sensitive research data secret, such as the location of wildlife.

Buzz Hettick, chairman of the Wyoming chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, has seen information on big game animals, including GPS location data, pictures and suggestions on where to camp and how to kill the animal, sell for $2,500. The transaction eliminates the hunting part and makes it all about killing, Hettick said.

“The hardest part of hunting these animals, a lot of the time, is just being able to find them,” he said.

Animals move, of course, but many establish reliable patterns of teritorial use, often staying within concise ranges during much of the hunting season. A major part of hunting is matching wits with wildlife, Hettick said. Technological advances continue to give humans advantages over the animals. Finding the game, however, has remained a challenge.

The buying and selling of game locations also violates the “fair chase” hunting ethic, he said.

“Fair chase is about giving an animal a fair shake,” Hettick said. “You cross the line when the animal can no longer detect you by sight, sound or smell.” Or when it can no longer hide, he added.

If passed, the ban would be one of the first in the country, said Tim Brass, state policy and field operations director with Backcountry Hunters and Anglers.

States are trying to keep up with and regulate technology in different ways.

“It’s really the wild West right now,” he said.

Last week Nevada banned using game cameras during hunting season and live-action game cameras year round, Brass said. Other states are considering similar laws or determining if existing laws cover these new practices like multi-state online information sales.

Selling information about where to find wildlife not only takes away from the hunting experience and violates fair chase, Brass said, it also stacks the deck against the “regular Joe” hunter.

An elk earned the old-fashioned way — through countless hours of scouting, miles of stalking in rugged terrain and a long walk home with a year’s worth of meat. (Steven Brutger)

“It becomes a system where the guy with the most money gets access to all the best bulls,” he said.

A bill similar to this year’s proposed law was introduced last session, said Rep. Jim Allen (R-Lander), chairman of the Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources Committee, which sponsored this year’s bill.

Last year’s bill passed the House, but stalled in the Senate when someone asked if he’d be in violation of the law if a guide told him where to find a buck and then he bought the guide a cup of coffee, Allen said.

This year’s bill specifically addresses advertising and selling information on the open market to make sure the intent is clear, he said.

The bill this year also explicitly exempts outfitters from the ban. Guides are licensed and have to follow specific rules, Allen said. Plus, they don’t sell information on a specific animal, they sell the entire hunting experience, he said. The wording of the bill exempted guides to make sure they weren’t inadvertently impacted, Allen said.

It’s the one part of the proposed law Hettick dislikes. It leaves a loophole, he said.

“If you are going to make it illegal, just make it illegal for everyone,” he said.

The other bill dealing with wildlife and GPS data would allow Wyoming Game and Fish to deny requests for “specific details of bona fide research projects” and wildlife location data that could “determine the specific location of an individual animal or group of animals.”

Currently the department has to go to court to deny study information requests because its gathered by a state agency and data is considered public record, Nesvik said.

The agency fielded a request for the most current location data from all collared wolves at the start of a wolf hunting season, he said. The department wanted to deny it because it violated fair chase ethics.

A photographer requested data from grizzly bear collars. He wanted to set up in his cameras outside of a den to try to capture images of a bear emerging in the spring with cubs, Nesvik said. This request put both the animals and people in danger, Nesvik said.

A judge upheld the department’s request to deny the information in both cases, but going through the legal proceedings took a significant amount of time and resources, Nesvik said.

Never miss a Peaks to Plains. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter.

The rule is important to protect wildlife, but also to guard proprietary research information from ongoing studies with academic or private partners, Nesvik said.

A similar bill last year passed the Senate and then died in the House, Allen said. There was concern it was too broad and would protect data people would want and should be able to access. This year the committee tried to make the bill more specific, he said.

Allen wasn’t sure when the House would consider the two GPS bills. The legislative session begins Feb. 12. Because it’s a budget session, all bills require a two-thirds introductory vote.

“I’m hoping they will move right along,” Allen said.

Kelsey Dayton is a freelancer and the editor of Outdoors Unlimited, the magazine of the Outdoor Writers Association of America. She has worked as a reporter for the Gillette News-Record, Jackson Hole News&Guide...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I’m with Mr. Vanderoff on this one, the hunting situation in WYO. has become a huge money grab to pursue these animals and fish. The Mule deer population has continued to slide in WY and the simple answer is to cut the permits period. All the trapping and the studies that go on has been done time and time again. The Game just needs a big BREAK. The wildlife would be just fine with just law inforcement and not hunted from Aug. thru Jan.

  2. Not that this propposed legislation isn’t a good idea. It is. But it’s important to keep in mind that Wyoming Game & Fish itself has been monetizing wildlife for decades ( their livelihood depends on it ) . Add that to their micromanagement of hunting areas and establishment of limited quota licenses , ad absurdum .

    Wyo G&F may claim to be the stewards of wildlife in our state, but reality shows they are marketers of game animals and game fish and game fowl.

    Two things: we all need to understand the difference between wildlife, and game. Secondly and more importantly , Wyoming and every other state out there has long needed to create some other way to fund WILDLIFE stewardship besides hunting tags and gishing licenses. QED.

  3. This bill is good
    But so much of hunting violates fair chase
    Cell phones
    Try hand to hand combat let’s see who wins
    Trophy hunting has to go
    And leave Wolves, coyotes, Fox and other wildlife that’s not eaten alone