Developers are proposing a large data center and energy complex on the Falls Ranch east of Casper. (Falls Ranch)

A sprawling data center and energy complex proposal east of Casper is not dead, according to the property owner, despite Prometheus Hyperscale pulling out of the project earlier this week.

Falls Ranch, a limited partnership owned by Texas billionaire Russell Gordy, announced this week that “work will continue without delay.”

“The work by the community and local leaders has helped lay the foundation for a project with the potential to position Natrona County as a leader in the growing data center industry, building on Wyoming’s energy resources, skilled workforce and experience supporting major industrial development, and should not be wasted,” Falls Ranch stated in a press release following Prometheus’ announcement.

Though it was not involved in initial development plans, according to the company, the groundwork has been laid for it to see the project to fruition.

Residents who packed a Sept. 1, 2026, Natrona County Board of Commissioners meeting were asked to raise their hands if they support a proposal to build a data center. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

“We anticipate that with this change, the project should continue forward on a more efficient track, including community and business collaborations,” Falls Ranch representative Robert Hand said. “This has always been a Wyoming project, but today it represents something even greater: an opportunity for Natrona County to shape its own economic future.” 

More details will be revealed in the near future, Hand added.

Prometheus announced its departure from the project Wednesday. Originally, the $500 million, 1,250-megawatt complex was to be sited on Falls Ranch property spanning Natrona and Converse counties north of Interstate 25. In its latest configuration, it would sit entirely in Natrona County, south of the Interstate.

The move opened the door for developers to bypass a state-level Industrial Siting Council review and permitting process to instead empower Natrona County commissioners to vet the project. If green lit locally, however, the endeavor would still be subject to review from several state and federal agencies. That process had not advanced beyond initial discussions before Prometheus exited the project.

Prometheus is still pursuing a similar data center and energy complex in Uinta County, and the company indicated it is looking for more data center opportunities elsewhere in the state.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *