Trucks pass in front of the Kemmerer Mine, the slopes and faces of which can be seen in the background. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr./WyoFile)

Two bills to protect retired Wyoming coal miners’ healthcare benefits from being lost to bankruptcy have been introduced in the U.S. Congress. Neither has the support of any member of Wyoming’s congressional delegation thus far, and it’s unclear if they’ll get it.

Legislation in both the House and Senate would allow retired members of the labor union United Mine Workers of America affected by 2018 coal company bankruptcies to participate in a preexisting federal program to protect unionized miners left uninsured by previous coal bankruptcies. The covered group would include an estimated 500 retirees from bankrupt Westmoreland Coal Company’s Kemmerer Mine.

The program, which receives a $450 million federal appropriation each year, has adequate funds to cover the the affected retirees, according to a UMWA spokesman.

A bankruptcy judge has allowed Westmoreland to renege on its Kemmerer Mine retiree healthcare obligations as part of the company’s restructuring in bankruptcy.

Brought by Rep. Robert Scott (D-Va), the house bill, H.R. 934, has bipartisan sponsorship with two Republicans from eastern coal mining states joining 11 Democrats. It was introduced Jan. 31.

On Feb. 19 the House Committee on Natural Resources referred it to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources which has yet to act on the bill. Wyoming’s lone U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney (R) is a member of that subcommittee.

Senate bill S. 27 brought by West Virginia Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin is more expansive but would cover the retired Kemmerer miners’ health care through the same mechanism as H.R. 934. The bill has six sponsors, all of whom are Democrats.

It is before the Senate Finance Committee, where Wyoming’s senior senator Mike Enzi (R) serves.

The bills are being pushed by the UMWA, which is campaigning on two fronts — the halls of Congress in Washington D.C. and in bankruptcy court in Houston where the Westmoreland case is being heard — to recover the health benefits it believes its miners are contractually owed.  

The union was able to wrangle $6 million from Westmoreland in the bankruptcy court to cover healthcare benefits, but that likely won’t last a year, said Phill Smith, the United Mine Workers of America’s director of government affairs. The union is trying to get more money out of the bankruptcy court, including a portion of fines a consulting company had to pay for malpractice in the proceedings.

The union “received indications” previously that Wyoming’s two senators are “supportive of preserving healthcare benefits for retired miners,” Smith said, but the sentiment hasn’t yet translated to support.

Support local reporting with a tax deductible donation today

Enzi was a prominent opponent of a 2016 bill that would have had the federal government bolster a pension fund for UMWA retirees. He said at the time that if the Senate acts it should act to protect retirement benefits for both unionized and non unionized miners, and suggested the union was taking advantage of a crisis affecting all coal miners.

The large mines that surround Enzi’s hometown of Gillette are not unionized and have suffered through their own waves of mining company bankruptcies. In March, however, Enzi’s office told the Casper Star-Tribune he was reviewing the Kemmerer situation but continued to hold doubts about the bill’s union affiliation.

Sen. Mike Enzi speaks to the Wyoming Legislature during the 2018 session. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

“[Enzi] is dedicated to working with those whose health care has been impacted by the mine’s bankruptcy, but remains concerned about any legislation that encourages or helps union and private companies to rely on taxpayers when the union and companies fail to deliver on their promises,” an Enzi spokesperson told the newspaper.

Sen. John Barrasso (R) told the newspaper he opposed S. 27 as it was written, but that he was “committed to finding a solution that will lessen the burden on the miners who have been denied the health benefits promise [sic].”

While Manchin’s senate bill deals with retired miners’ pensions as well as health care, H.R. 934 would only cover healthcare for the Kemmerer miners. Though current Kemmerer miners’ pensions are at risk of being diminished, retirees pensions are protected, Smith said.

Cheney’s views on the House bill are less clear to the union, Smith said. “We have not talked to [Rep.] Cheney,” he said.

WyoFile did not receive responses to repeated requests for comment from Cheney, Enzi or Barrasso’s offices.

Cloud Peak Energy, which has been teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, announced it would stop paying healthcare to retired miners last year. Cloud Peak’s Wyoming workforce, like the majority of the Wyoming coal industry, is not unionized. Other coal companies, including some of Wyoming’s biggest players, have also moved to shed healthcare benefits during bankruptcy proceedings.

Nonunion coal miners from at least one struggling coal company are fighting back. Nonunion retired coal miners with CONSOL Energy Inc., which does not have Wyoming operations, have sued the company for reducing healthcare benefits they believed they were promised.

Andrew Graham is reporting for WyoFile from Laramie. He covers state government, energy and the economy. Reach him at 443-848-8756 or at, follow him @AndrewGraham88

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. It is a sad deal. The coal miners deserve what was promised to them. However they most likely voted for Enzi, Barrasso, & Cheney so in a way I guess they are their own worst enemy. Those three are for coal company’s not coal miners!

  2. Nice to know Senator Enzi is looking out for the tax payers. Since we subsidize 70% of the tab for health insurance for members of Congress, and spend a paltry $3.4 million every weekend for Mr. Trump’s junket to Florida, one would think out-of-work miners might deserve taxpayer support as well.

  3. “[Enzi] is dedicated to working with those whose health care has been impacted by the mine’s bankruptcy, but remains concerned about any legislation that encourages or helps union and private companies to rely on taxpayers when the union and companies fail to deliver on their promises,” an Enzi spokesperson told the newspaper.

    Why not? The companies get to run to the government, pick a friendly jurisdiction halfway across the country, get financial relief in Bankruptcy court to break their promises and ‘cancel’ their debt to their workers in the first place, then use those savings to reorganize, sell some assets and become solvent, all while offering hefty bonuses to their CEOs for their ‘work’ during the process.

    Those companies also get to run to the government to straight-up bail them out when the ‘free market’ kills their sales and Republicans at both the State and National Level are usually more than thrilled to oblige (or at least try).

    Workers who spent their whole lives building and maintaining that company get screwed, while a couple of random investment bankers get to make a huge windfall off their sometimes literal broken backs.