The Drake's Take
Any way you look at it, these Boy Scouts no longer have a home

Kerry Drake
Kerry Drake

— December 17, 2013

When I heard that a Cheyenne church was kicking out its Boy Scout troop, I called its minister to find out what happened. What could a group of boys who spend much of their time earning merit badges do to a church that would result in showing them the door?

It turned out it wasn’t something the members of Troop 102 did, but a decision made by the organization’s leaders at the national level. In May, the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) reversed a longstanding, homophobic policy and will now accept openly gay members. The BSA’s action toward youth between 11 and 17 quelled some criticism from gay and lesbian groups, but they were upset that the ban on homosexual adult Scout leaders was not also lifted. Meanwhile, many churches that sponsor troops were outraged and threatened revolt.

The new policy officially goes into effect January 1. Members of First Congregational Church voted at their annual meeting on December 8 to sever their church’s ties with the Boy Scouts, even though they’ve sponsored the troop since 1959. By all accounts it’s been a great relationship, and church members have been grateful for the help they’ve received over the years from Scouts. So why do they have to go?

Rev. Kevin Frank explained it to me like this: “We are not kicking them out. The church decided not to renew [the troop’s] charter. It gave the Scouts an extended time period – through June, I believe – to continue meeting at the church while they search for a new charitable organization for a place to meet.”

He added that the church is letting the troop keep its number, plus all of the items that Scouts have collected for the past 54 years.

“The intent of the congregation in that decision was to bless them as they went,” the reverend said. “It wasn’t with hard hearts that we were choosing not to renew the charter. We just felt we needed to honor God and his word.

“We are not kicking them out,” Frank repeated.

Technically, I guess one could argue that the church is slowly shooing them out, and not planting its figurative foot in the Scouts’ collective rear. But the net effect is that the troop is no longer welcome in a church that’s been its home for more than five decades. That’s certainly an odd way to “bless” them.

I note the denials, but I still say they’re being kicked out. Does the church have something against gays?

Frank said it does not. “I don’t think there’s a church in America that has entered into these conversations lightly or gladly,” he explained. “It’s nothing against gays or homosexuals.”

Churches across America are addressing the Scouts’ policy change, the reverend said, “because the Bible, which is God’s word, says that we are not to align ourselves with things that are sinful, and homosexuality is one of those things that is defined within the Bible as sinful.”

He added that if the church was anti-gay, it could have taken the same action many other churches did in June, and not renewed the charter then. “We didn’t rush to judgment,” Frank said.

I’m not a very religious person, and I’m definitely not qualified to make a theological argument about why I view this as a terrible decision for everyone involved. I’m not about to tell anyone what they should believe, and I certainly recognize the congregation’s right to do what it did. But such action seems to totally contradict the teachings of Jesus Christ, who is the basis for their beliefs and the church’s reason to exist. The church may view homosexuality as a sin, but my understanding is that Christians say they love their neighbors – hate the sin but love the sinner. I don’t think casting them out was ever an option for Jesus, nor should it be for his followers.

I tried to ask several Scout leaders at the local and Longs Peak Council levels how they feel about the loss of the troop’s charter, but my phone calls weren’t returned. I suspect that no one in the organization wants to burn the bridge between the Boy Scouts and First Congregational.

“It’s a tough decision, especially with what the Bible tells us (about homosexuality), but the Bible also tells us we’re all redeemable,” said Tom Conroy, a church member who strongly supported allowing the Scouts to stay. “I was just kind of sad to see a 50-year partnership dissolved. … Jesus also said a lot about the need to forgive.”

Frank didn’t tell me the exact vote, but Conroy said it was very close. Others, who asked for anonymity because they feared reprisals for supporting the Scouts, said many tears were flowing at the end of the meeting. Others were angry.

Frank made a valid point when he told me that before 61 percent of the BSA’s national delegates voted to allow gays to join, the organization’s own polls estimated that between 100,000 and 350,000 Scouts nationwide might quit. Some religious leaders put the figure closer to 1 million, and the Southern Baptist Church warned that hundreds of churches may not renew troop charters.

“They did it anyway,” Frank said.

But officials of other churches – including the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which sponsors 430,000 Scouts, more than any other church – praised the BSA. Michael Otterson, LDS public relations director, said allowing gay Scouts “in reality reintroduced and reinforced some of its century-old core values and nailed those colors firmly to the mast in an unmistakable message.”

That message is the need to accept others for who they are. I think that’s in the Bible, too.

So where do the Scouts go from here?

Reportedly, several other Cheyenne churches have approached Troop 102 about potential sponsorships. That’s great news, and if it happens, it will likely ease the confusion and hurt feelings that the boys must be experiencing. In one sense, maybe First Congregational did Troop 102 a favor. If the majority of the congregation cannot accept letting a group that allows gay members to be on their property, at least now the Scouts are in a position to work with others who will welcome them.

Being cast as pariahs and sinners by segments of society because they are homosexual isn’t anything new to anyone who is gay. By the time they reach the age of Scouting, they may have been teased, bullied and called hateful names for years, and some have also been physically assaulted by peers. Such treatment has led to many suicides by young gays, who are made to feel that they will never fit in or be treated humanely.

It’s just as painful when gays are treated unfairly by adult church members, but perhaps the new BSA policy will help our nation join others that recognize everyone has equal rights, and that includes choosing whom to love. Gay and straight Scouts can now learn together, after years of institutional discrimination end.

It’s good for both to realize that not every denomination considers being gay an abomination in the eyes of God. Hopefully, once they leave First Congregational, the Scouts of Troop 102 will meet in a place that preaches acceptance of others despite their differences, and practices it in thought, word and deed.

— Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake is the editor-in-chief of The Casper Citizen, a nonprofit, online community newspaper. It can be viewed at

— Columns are the signed perspective of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of WyoFile’s staff, board of directors or its supporters. WyoFile welcomes guest columns and op-ed pieces from all points of view. If you’d like to write a guest column for WyoFile, please contact WyoFile editor-in-chief Dustin Bleizeffer at

REPUBLISH THIS COLUMN: For details on how you can republish this column or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

If you enjoyed this post and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake has covered Wyoming for more than four decades, previously as a reporter and editor for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle and Casper Star-Tribune. He lives in Cheyenne and...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. While it’s sad to see a separation of ties that date back over 50 years, this is probably good for all parties involved. The troop will almost certainly find new sponsorship with an organization that will welcome the Boy Scout’s revised national charter, and the First Congregational Church gets to continue to practice homophobia.

    I know very well the deep ties of religious devotion to scouting. But in my personal scouting experience, reverence came not from the halls of a church but from the stands of trees deep in the wilderness. I’ve never felt a divine spirit as much as when I was hiking through the woods or climbing a mountain with my troop.

    Nature does not pass judgement upon us. It is not homophobic. Nature can also be forgiving to those who are prepared. To quote John Muir, “Keep close to Nature’s heart… and break clear away, once in awhile, and climb a mountain or spend a week in the woods. Wash your spirit clean.”

    Perhaps the First Congregational Church should take Muir’s advice, and a page from the Boy Scout handbook, and venture into the wilderness to wash their spirits clean. I’m sure Troop 102 can help guide them.

  2. It seems that even among the parishioners who don’t want the Scouts to leave, an attitude prevails that homosexuality is a sin that can be forgiven. At least those people are willing to be tolerant, but they still don’t accept the fact that being gay is not a sin.
    And the church’s insistence on purging “sinners” certainly contradicts the teachings of Christ.
    Whether gay or straight, the boys in this troop are victims of bullying by the church. What a lesson they are being taught — good deeds don’t go unpunished. Loyalty doesn’t matter.
    Cognitive dissonance — a sign of madness. That’s religion for ya.
    As always, GREAT work by Mr. Drake!

  3. The militarization of youth, organized right-wing protestantism and homophobia: these were pillars of McCarthy-era society. It seems like Kerry Drake is reporting on the last living relic of cold war society, which finally has a date with its long overdue fate. On the bright side, kids in this troop will no longer have to be exposed to an ideology that should have been consigned to history books long ago. I wish them luck in finding a better home.

  4. Thanks for this article, Kerry. I had no idea this had happened in Cheyenne. I would point out that First Congregational Church is not affiliated with any church denomination and their actions are solely confined to that specific church. It seems harsh, uncharitable and unChristian to punish children for decisions made by adults far, far away.

    As the member of a denomination which has lead the mainstream Christian movement to embrace and empower our LGBT members, we never once considered shutting the door on our Boy Scout troops all those years when the national organization held such objectionable, homophobic policies. It’s not what Jesus would do.

    While I imagine that the boys, their parents and their scoutmasters are saddened to lose their home of a half-century, this is a good lesson in what love, inclusion and acceptance really look like. I hope the leadership of Troop 102 explains to those Scouts precisely why they were asked to leave that church.

  5. Biblical injunctions about “teh gay” are ALL Old Testment. Zip about the topic in the New Testament unless you really want to torture language and logic. So how do conservative “Christians” justify the label “Christian” when they act much more like a pastoral, patriarchal band of Middle Easterners from about 4,000 years ago?
    Good article, Kerry.