The Joint Appropriations Committee voted last week to sponsor a bill making permanent a temporary merger of the Wyoming Department of Health and the Department of Family Services.

The Department of Family Services was placed under the control of Department of Health director Tom Forslund in June, when the DFS director resigned. At the time, Forslund told the Casper Star-Tribune he would look at whether a permanent merger of the two made sense. His staff has decided it does, he told lawmakers on the JAC on Jan. 10.

The merger would create opportunities for savings and efficiencies by melding the support staff behind the two agencies. There was no discussion of whether jobs would be reduced through the merger. Nor is there any current estimate of how much taxpayer money could be saved, House Appropriations Chairman Bob Nicholas told WyoFile.

Forslund also said he believed the two agencies’ clients would benefit. Many people who are served by one agency are also served by the other, Forslund said. He estimated the overlap in clients at more than 80 percent, as both agencies frequently focus on assisting low-income Wyoming residents. For example, someone receiving services from DFS is probably also a Medicaid client, Forslund said.

The JAC voted nearly unanimously to support the bill, but other lawmakers outside the committee may not back the endeavor. While the JAC approached the bill from the perspective of budget writers, two other committees — the Joint Judiciary Committee and the Joint Labor and Health Committee — oversee the two agencies’ effectiveness. The judiciary committee focuses on some of the enforcement policies DFS must deal with.

There could be concerns from those committee members, the House Labor and Health Committee Chairman Eric Barlow told JAC. Barlow said his Senate co-chairman, longtime Sen. Charles Scott, disliked the idea. One worry he and Scott shared was proper support for DFS caseworkers, who must engage with people on child custody and other difficult family issues, Barlow said. It’s “the toughest job in state government,” he said.

Trimming government

The Department of Health is an agency giant, with the state’s largest budget according to the Governor’s 2019-2020 budget letter. The state has too many agencies, Forslund said, which makes the governor’s oversight more difficult than if agencies were centralized under single heads. Forslund has run DOH for seven years, but his tenure will end in January 2019, with that of Gov. Matt Mead, he told the lawmakers.

While approving the merger, Forslund said both agencies will continue to function regardless of what route lawmakers take. “At the end of the day, it’s a policy call,” he said. “It’ll work either way. But I think right now the structure of the state government is large and for a small state we’ve got a lot of agencies.”

The Legislature has been pursuing efficiency studies to reduce the size and cost of Wyoming’s government. The Legislature’s Management Council, made up of top lawmakers from both parties and houses, is considering a bill to act on the preliminary recommendations of the Wyoming Government Spending and Efficiency Commission. That commission, of lawmakers and private citizens, was formed at the end of the 2017 legislative session. Their report included a recommendation to consider merging DOH and DFS.

While supporting the efficiency study, Mead also pointed out in his budget letter that the state budget is $400 million less than it was at the start of his terms.

 

The Department of Health’s report on the proposed merger is provided below:

Andrew Graham covers criminal justice for WyoFile.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *