Wyoming wind energy proponents dodged a bullet last week when a legislative committee shot down yet another proposal to increase taxes on the industry.

But some are worried that having a tax debate about renewable energy year after year is taking its toll on wind projects and harming the industry’s chances of capitalizing on a robust 2020. It may not matter if any of these repeated broadsides actually land; the uncertainty alone can scare off investors and eliminate the state’s chance to thrive.

I don’t think it’s necessarily a case of direct assault on wind power in Wyoming. It’s more like a steady drumbeat of opposition led by two groups with divergent interests — one that genuinely wants equity in taxes on renewable resources and fossil fuels, and a second simply unwilling or unable to accept the end of coal’s glory days.

The first scenario leads to a fundamental problem, because tax parity can’t exist for industries that use such different resources to generate electricity. How does a state assign equal values to a finite product like coal when it’s ripped from the ground, and an infinite one like wind that must be captured as it blows across our landscape for it to have any value?

The traditional apples-to-apples comparisons don’t exist for wind and coal. The challenge for legislators, then, is to create policies that will allow an upstart industry like wind to compete without being taxed out of existence.

For lawmakers intent on propping up the coal industry at all costs, it doesn’t matter whether the competition comes from wind, solar, battery storage or some Earth-saving, peace-love-and-harmony-inducing miracle energy technology from outer space. If coal doesn’t win, these legislators think everyone in the state loses. They are true believers, frustrated that an industry that has brought so much revenue to Wyoming is the victim of what they view as environmental political correctness.

Even so, by a vote of 7-2 last Thursday, the House Revenue Committee wisely killed House Bill 108 – Wind energy production tax. The measure would have doubled the wind tax — adding $1 per megawatt hour to the $1 per MW hour that has been enforced since the state began taxing wind generation in 2009.

That initial wind tax has worried me since it was enacted, because of its potential to slow growth in a renewable energy industry. Wyoming and the world need that industry if we’re going to have a prayer of fighting climate change by ending carbon emissions. That’s the big picture, and it packs just as much of a punch locally as it does globally.

HB 108 would have inflicted further damage on the wind industry by ending the three-year tax exemption on power generation once a project goes online now in effect.

Initially, the minerals industry denigrated wind and solar power as inconsistent and expensive. Renewables could never overtake coal, oil and natural gas, they claimed. And as renewable resources became cheaper and gained a larger share of the energy market, a backlash grew.

Matt Micheli, a Cheyenne attorney and former chair of the Wyoming Republican Party, has street cred on this issue because he’s represented both coal and wind interests. He testified against HB 108, in part because Micheli realizes that raising taxes on any industry does not guarantee more revenue to state or local governments.

There’s a good reason why Wyoming mines more than 10 times the amount of coal than Montana does in the Powder River Basin, Micheli told the Revenue Committee. Unlike its northern neighbor, he said, the Equality State kept coal taxes low enough to encourage investment in the industry so it could flourish.

In 2010, Micheli recalled, Wyoming had 30 industrial wind farms on the drawing boards. Zero of those were built after the wind generation tax went into effect, which is precisely what the industry warned would happen.

After losing the momentum it had gained prior to the wind tax, the industry struggled until last year, when Wyoming’s online wind capacity statewide increased by nearly 1,000 megawatts. That is second only to Texas in new construction.

The wind industry’s gains coincided with the decline of both coal production and state tax revenues. Some coal companies declared bankruptcies due to market forces, including cheaper natural gas and renewables. The COVID-19 pandemic also led to lower coal usage and mining job losses.

“Now we have $10 billion worth of wind projects that are once again in the pipeline, ready to come to this state,” Micheli said. “We’re hearing [legislators make] the same arguments from more than a decade ago — we’ll get more revenue if we put another dollar [wind generation tax] on top of these contracts.”

Randy Fitzpatrick of NextEra Energy Resources, the world’s largest developer of wind and solar projects, told the panel that in the highly competitive world of renewable energy, the difference between winning or losing a contract often comes down to pennies per megawatt hour.

The tax structures in different states are plugged into companies’ bid formulas, he said. Wyoming lost aNextEra project to Colorado over a mere 40 cents per MW hour, Fitzpatrick said. Doubling the current $1 per MW hour tax means Wyoming wind companies might as well just close up shop.

Wyoming is the only state in the nation that requires the wind industry to pay three forms of taxes, Micheli noted: on electricity generation, sales and property. If all of the state’s wind projects come to fruition, he said, it would mean almost $1.5 billion in state tax revenue over the next 20 years.

But a 100% increase in the wind generation tax that renders Wyoming unappealing would result in no new tax revenue, period.

“If we force these projects to other states, where is that money going to come from?” Micheli asked. “I don’t want to increase sales taxes and property taxes. I don’t want an income tax.”

Some proponents of higher wind taxes are tired of the extractive industries’ claim that if Wyoming increases severance taxes, wind projects will pull up stakes and leave the state.

But these critics know they’ve been lied to for years, because the state has an abundance of fossil fuels. If corporations want access to these riches, there are few other places they can go to get them.

But while Wyoming also has exceptional wind resources, it’s not the only game in town. 

Lawmakers should realize there’s nothing to gain by punishing the wind industry simply because the tax realities it faces are so markedly different than coal’s situation.

Wyoming Business Alliance President Cindy DeLancey also testified against HB 108. “This is where our money is going to come from,” she said of wind energy. “We’re at a point where we are thinking about our revenue challenges, how we broaden our tax base … [Instead of] adding additional barriers to produce non-mineral revenue, we need to be opening our doors.”

Support informed commentary — donate to WyoFile today

Indeed, Wyoming’s major energy competitors, including Colorado and Utah, have paved the way for their success by offering property tax abatements and sales tax exemptions for wind projects. 

Neither wind nor solar projects are likely to ever fully compensate for the loss of tax revenues earned by coal, oil and gas at their peak, but renewable energy represents one of the best ways for Wyoming to reform its tax base and diversify the state’s economy. 

It won’t take long for lenders and utilities to get jittery about Wyoming’s lack of commitment to its renewable energy sector and shut off the money tap. Wind companies have spent the last decade trying to overcome the negative effects of the state’s initial electricity generation tax, while successfully pushing back against some legislative efforts to raise the tax up to four times its current rate. 

Micheli closed his testimony by asking if Wyoming legislators will be able to resist making the kind of harmful tax decisions that have hampered the growth of the state’s wind industry until now.

Their vote proved they are able. That’s good news, but the state is lagging. Voters should ask why Wyoming is still having this conversation in 2021.

Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake has covered Wyoming for more than four decades, previously as a reporter and editor for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle and Casper Star-Tribune. He lives in Cheyenne and...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Judging from some of the comments, my opinion is that the country has already gone to down the drain in a handbasket. The plunderers will keep plundering and destroying the landscape, and underground, until there is nothing left to plunder. Then, we will become extinct…and it won’t really be very long before that happens if we continue our dominionist, “god-justified”, stupid, ways. All that windmills really generate is business as usual for private power companies. Hydroelectric potential is very small, particularly in dry states, like Wyoming.

    If the country was really serious about anything other than world domination and making the wealthy wealthier, it would mandate solar cells on every new and existing structure. Construction, maintenance, and eventual replacement would be paid for by hefty income and wealth taxes those self-identified “risk taker” robber barons (who really risk nothing more than money, money earned on the backs of low-paid labor…or inherited).

  2. Wind projects are placed in crucial winter ranges for Elk, Deer and Antelope. The studies of their effects on wildlife are still premature, but it would appear these animals do not want to co-exist with wind farms, almost all together avoiding the areas. They already an eyesore and a prolific bird killers. I anxiously await the Universities’ studies in regards to the long term impact to habitat.
    Keep in mind the life of these projects is forever, once you “electrify everything” more and more will have to be built and placed. Oil and gas can re-enter the same hole many times before useful life is completed. Wind turbines are no solution from an actual conservation standpoint. You can drive down almost any Wyoming highway and see the very same wildlife paying no mind to oil and gas infrastructure, and after coal seems are closed and habitat restored wildlife tends to flourish.
    Wind is a loss for anyone who believes in conservation or preservation of wildlife and lands. You’re just fooled by virtue signaling buzzwords.

    1. Where do you get the idea that Deer and Antelope avoid wind farms? that’s certainly not true in Wyoming or Colorado. I see this from personal experience in both states. Deer and Antelope are indifferent to wind turbines and graze and wonder freely through those areas.

    2. “eyesore and prolific bird killers”… That is the perfect defenition of the all those oil wells and pits around the state.

    3. Please cite your sources. I know of nothing academically that supports your assertions.

      1. Be prepared to see a citation that originates from Facebook or some other half brained source.

        There is no reputable study that will verify the goofy claims. If the original poster was honest, they’d admit that as well.

        1. http://www.uwyo.edu/esm/faculty-and-staff/beck/research/elk-response-wind.html
          – showing after the installation of the wind farm, elk generally avoided the area.


          To electrify everything, you will see a at least a 90% increase in US electricity demands by 2050. Meaning a the amount of wind turbines will increase nearly 100%. The industry currently kills as many birds as O&G, but with increases it will kill at least 2:1 what O&G does, especially when you consider their migration paths in relation to wind belts. The ignorance on both sides is shameful, all of you included. Princeton even released a study saying by 2050 to meet electrical demands, 225,000sq miles of land will need to be covered in renewable energy sources. This is the size of Montana, Wyoming and Colorado combined, every acre, every nook and cranny. Oh and dont forget that by 2050, all current wind turbines will need replaced (their lifespan is 25yrs).

          Neither political side possesses the answers they think they do and the worst side of any argument to have is just one, and all of you epitomize this.

  3. When it comes to fossil fuels, Wyoming leadership relies on fossil thinking.

    Therefore I propose we proclaim a lump of coal to be the official State Fossil in order to remain devoted to our antediluvian belief system.

    Now if you will excuse me, I have to tend to my off-grid decentralized power modules… the rooftop solar and small wind plant that are hydrolizing grey water to extract hydrogen for the redundant fuel cells that run my household , and also charge my Tesla car and truck, and whose surplus power is pooled in the neighborhood lithium battery bank down the alley just in case the asteroid hits.

    Centralized national power grids and massive fossil fuel generation are s-o-o-o-o-o-o Old Soviet Union communist socialist on their best of days…

  4. As an outsider I read about this war between incoming wind and outgoing coal and the revenues wind might or might not produce and wonder why nobody ever mentions climate change and it’s effect on Wyoming.. One of the reasons I sold my cabin in the Shoshone National Forest is because drought ( cases by a warming climate) paved the way for zillions of bark beetles which transformed the verdant Lodgepole Forest into a landscape of witch’s broomsticks. As soon as I put my cabin on the market a 14,000 acre wildfire broke out, threatening ranches and the entire town of Dubois, amAnd no one wanted to drive through the flames for a viewing.. Yet none of your reports mention climate change or seem to think it will affect Wyoming — a good reason to substitute wind power for coal. And yes the windmills are hideous , but so are dead and burned forests.

  5. We are so consumed with wind solar , coal and gas power hydroelectric has been forgotten .
    No carbon footprint their . We don’t have to build dams to do this our infrastructure is already in place . Producing clean power isn’t the problem it those who own the transmission lines that determine wear the power comes from and at what price.