It’s been more than a decade since the federal government passed legislation bearing the name of slain Wyoming son Matthew Shepard. How much longer must we wait for the Equality State to enact its own hate crime law?

Can shame or, at least, economics finally spur state lawmakers to action?

 Most states that have passed comprehensive hate crime laws did so only after a member of a vulnerable population was seriously injured or killed just because of who they are, according to Cynthia Deitle. Deitle was the chief of the FBI’s Civil Rights Unit before joining the Matthew Shepard Foundation as its director of civil rights reform. 

The Georgia Legislature is the most recent example, approving a hate crimes bill in 2020 following the tragic shooting death of Ahmaud Arbery. State lawmakers could no longer ignore the pleas of the African-American community and a broad-based coalition of business and nonprofit organizations to outlaw bias-motivated violence, Deitle said.

When Matthew Shepard was brutally murdered in Laramie — tied to a fence by two local men, beaten and left for dead — it became one of the most high-profile crimes of the day. News that he was targeted because he was gay spread throughout the world and galvanized the LGBTQ community and allies to call for hate crime laws.

The conservative lawmakers in charge of the Wyoming Legislature had rejected bias crimes bills since the early 1990s, and Shepard’s murder didn’t move the needle an inch.

“The Equality State showed the country and the world that despite their moniker, the Legislature did not champion equality or equal rights, which allowed hate to flourish unchecked,” Deitle said.

In 2009, Congress passed a federal hate crime law that bears the names of Shepard and James Byrd Jr., an African-American man who was killed by three white supremacists in Jasper, Texas, in 1998. Byrd was dragged behind a truck for three miles.

Wyoming’s Republican congressional delegation — Sens. John Barrasso and Mike Enzi and Rep. Cynthia Lummis — all voted against the act. Enzi is now retired, and Lummis is his successor.

Wyoming joins Arkansas and South Carolina as the three states that still lack statutes enhancing penalties for hate-motivated crimes. Wyoming may prove to be the last holdout, Deitle said. 

“Does Wyoming want to be the only state that allows targeted violence against all their residents to flourish without repercussions?” Deitle asked. “I always thought that Wyomingites cherished their freedoms to worship how they want and love who they want.”

In addition to the moral obligation that local, state and federal governmental officials have to prevent identity-motivated crime, there is also an economic factor to consider. 

“To me it’s such a no-brainer. What corporation is going to want to come here if they feel unsafe in the state?” said Judy Shepard, Matthew’s mother. “Even if the corporation protects its employees, the state not passing those kind of protections just sends this message that ‘we don’t want you here.’”

Decades of research have shown that diversity sparks innovation, creativity and overall success in business environments, Deitle said.

“Business leaders want to recruit a diverse workforce whose families will thrive in communities that are protected, not targeted,” she said. “Wyoming is facing a crushing budget crisis which can be ameliorated by inviting new businesses to a more welcoming state.”

How widespread are hate crimes in Wyoming? Unfortunately, because law enforcement agencies in the state for many years did not report their hate crime data to the FBI — which is not mandatory under federal law — we don’t know how severe the threat of bias-motivated crime is in Wyoming.

But we know it exists. As WyoFile reported in October, an LGBTQ Wapiti couple reported to local law enforcement that a group of neighbors accosted them at their home and told them they needed to leave because “their kind” wasn’t welcome in the area.

Only four crimes where hatred of the victim’s identity was listed as a major factor were counted in Wyoming in 2019. James Simmons, former head of the Casper NAACP chapter, said the lack of a bias crimes law means police and prosecutors usually categorize them as assaults and “suspicious behavior.”

Hate crimes are “message crimes.” When a crime is committed against a person due to race, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or gender, entire communities are terrorized.

“When Matt was killed, the LGBTQ+ community saw targets on their backs and cowered in fear that they would be next,” Deitle said. “Wyoming turned their backs on them and all those who are ‘others.’”

The Wyoming Republican Party’s central committee isn’t content just to try to keep the state from enacting a hate crimes law. Before last year’s legislative session, it gave a list of its top priorities for GOP lawmakers. One was to stop passage of any bill that would provide equal-rights protections to LGBTQ citizens.

“Because [the Legislature] took a hard right this election I’m not sure we have a chance in this session to pass a hate crimes bill, but we’ll keep our fingers crossed,” Shepard said. “We’re hoping that with some corporate [lobbying] and some buy-in from businesses that we can actually get it accomplished.”

Shepard said she and her husband Dennis will continue to work behind the scenes to promote such legislation, but not out front.

“We made a decision years ago that we would never become personally involved in legislative issues in this regard,” she said. “We know all the haters would make it all about Matt. … There are just too many people who are still angry that what happened to Matt has created this narrative that Wyoming is a hate state.

“They could have changed it,” Shepard added. “They could have set the narrative themselves, but they chose not to.”

Support informed commentary — donate to WyoFile today.

She’s absolutely right about the state. Laramie, the site of Matt Shepard’s murder, has taken some positive action. It now has an LGBTQ anti-discrimination ordinance.

“The way I explain it to people who ask what the situation is now, if you went to Laramie looking for evidence that things have improved in terms of acceptance and understanding, you’d find it,” said Jason Marsden, former executive vice president of the Matthew Shepard Foundation. “The University of Wyoming has a robust anti-discrimination policy.

“But if you went to Laramie to find evidence that nothing has changed, you’d find that too,” he said. 

Deitle said Arkansas and South Carolina are both poised to pass hate crime laws in 2021. We’ll soon see if Wyoming legislators feel any sense of shame in governing the only state without such a law on the books. 

Like Shepard, I too have my fingers crossed. But based on the Legislature’s blatant failure to act during the past three decades, I’m not holding my breath.

Kerry Drake

Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake has covered Wyoming for more than four decades, previously as a reporter and editor for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle and Casper Star-Tribune. He lives in Cheyenne and...

Join the Conversation

10 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Hate crime laws, by their very nature, are not about equality. Vicious violent crimes should be dealt with harshly but differentiating punishment based on the race, creed, sexual orientation, gender, etc, of the victim is, by definition, not equality.

  2. It is all about “shame”, isn’t it?

    Please refer me to proof that these laws shield anyone from crime and promote a more peaceful coexistence. Happy to support such laws if the evidence is there but many things about such laws will always disturb me.

    In regards to criminal activity, I seriously doubt the well being of the LGBTQ community will change one iota if Wyoming passes “Hate-Crime” laws. This seems more like an attempt at promoting the self-esteem, visibility, and agenda of the LGBTQ community. And perhaps such laws are designed to send a political message from supporters to opponents (or to supporters from lawmakers).

    Was the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi a “Hate Crime”? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Jamal_Khashoggi)

    His murder was certainly motivated by hate. Was his murder less serious because he wasn’t murdered for being LGBTQ or whatever? Should any murderers pay a lessor price for their heinous deeds if they aren’t motivated by hate based upon a person’s characteristics of race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity?

    “I think they essentially come down to feel-good laws,” said Michael Bronski, a media studies professor at Harvard who co-wrote “Considering Hate: Violence, Goodness, and Justice in American Culture and Politics.”

    Couldn’t agree more until the evidence says they actually reduce hate and crime.

  3. Hate crime??? If you kill some one they are dead doesn’t matter if you hate them or not should carry the same sentence

  4. I have seen no evidence that the majority of Wyoming legislators are shamed by anything: failing to pass an expansion to Medicaid, failure to pass legislation to diversify the economy and deal with massive budget shortfalls, hundreds of hours wasted debating socially divisive religiously based wedge issues, the list goes on. Despite the failures of the legislature Wyoming voters continue to vote for representatives that are more right wing and less inclined to deal with the issues of the state than to push the agenda of the right wing Republican Party. Don’t expect the 2021 legislature to do anything but double down on their past actions.

  5. Thank you Kerry for covering the hard to hear issues. I love this state but I despise our politics.

  6. I did a lot of research on the Shepherd murder .At the time it was argued that this was not necessarily a hate crime, that we didn’t know for sure that McKinney and Henderson killed Matt because he was gay. But another crime they committed on that terrible night went unremarked: After tying Matt to the fence and leaving him to die in the cold they went to a park in Laramie– I forget the name — and beat up two Latino guys– also a hate crime. It was also argued that since the two murderers got life, what difference would it make if it was for a hate crime or not. Surely such a designation would not have prevented them from doing what they did. But the add-on of Hate Crime might influence any chance for parole, I suppose,especially for Henderson who wasnt the main perpetrator., As McKinney himself has said.. No one in this country should forget that murder, anymore than they should forget the brutal killing of Emmett Till in Mississippi.., Both of those hate crimes, I believe, increased national awareness of the harms done to both Black and Gay people..

  7. “Pass my leftist legislation or I will publicly shame my state to jobs don’t come here.”

    That’s political extortion.

    1. Wyoming is a super red state-possibly the reddest state in the union. There are very few “leftists” in Wyoming. That’s the reason new companies don’t want to come here. It’s an abrasive, one party political environment that only benefits agriculture and energy development.

    2. “Jobs”? Doing what exactly? It’s not like Wyoming has any capacity for industry. No water for one thing.

      About all you can hope for is increased tourism, which won’t happen if you allow oil companies and windmills to pollute the view, not to mention your aquifers. No one will come here to view abandoned, rusty oil rigs or gouged-out, overgrazed landscapes and forests.

      If the state were to rid itself of its love affair with resource plundering and otherwise get its act together, you might be able to attract a fair number of moderate income retirees to move here, but that’s about it, and they won’t come if you keep up your dumb plundering act and your self-destructive political ways.