China's rare earth role

How China came to monopolize the rare earth supply chain is a complex story. Today, it delivers 97 percent of the world’s rare earth elements and uses 60 percent to 70 percent. The United States had a rare-earth mine until 2002 at Mountain Pass, California. It was closed partly because of environmental violations, but more so, say officials, because of the inability to compete with the lower-cost rare earth elements being delivered onto the world market by China.

Rare Stake: Can Wyoming help serve world's hunger for rare earth minerals?

Molycorp, a company based in metropolitan Denver, recently bought the mine has now brought the mine back into production, but is sending the ores to China for processing while it readies its own processing.

China has used its rare earth deposits strategically. It has pledged allocation of resources to companies that are at least co-owned by Chinese. The policy had the practical effect of causing a substantial number of companies to move operations to China. China has been imposing tariffs on rare earth exports for several years, and has also begun cutting back exports.

It has also used its near monopoly on rare earth supplies as leverage in diplomatic disputes. For example, as the result of a territorial dispute involving a Chinese fishing trawler, the Chinese embargoed exports to Japan for two months in 2010. In March, President Barack Obama announced that the United States would join Japan and the European Union in a protest filed with the World Trade Organization (WTO) over the restricted exports. The complaint says the WTO rules forbid discrimination against foreign buyers.

Elliot Brennan, editor at the Institute for Security and Developing Policy at in Stockholm, Sweden, argues that rare earth elements, often reduced to the acronym REE, are likely to become “the new oil,” as he says China recognized 20 years ago. “It will be increasingly important for governments to secure national reserves of rare earth elements to support local high-tech industries and prevent future conflicts over the resource,” he wrote in Asia Times Online.

But the story has greater complexity than China simply wanting to have the world by the short hairs. China’s dominance in rare-earth resources is due in part to the flourishing of illegal mines whose output is smuggled. China now wants to clamp down on the rogue mines, consolidate ownership under a few corporations, and tighten up the environmental laxness. A compelling analysis of the international intrigue is offered by foreign policy analyst Peter Lee. In a March 24 essay, Lee argues that the complaints of other nations amount to a “China-bashing ball.”

“Not only were rare earth elements declared to be at the core of Western defense technology; enjoyment of the green marvel of the Prius and the high tech wonder of the iPhone were trained by the awareness that China, with its rare earth monopoly, could snatch them away at any time,” he wrote in Asia Times Online. Lee predicts that, “in a few years the dreaded Chinese rare earth monopoly will have collapsed, with the assistance of the Chinese themselves, and the free world can enjoy its hybrid vehicles, its smart phones, its Tomahawk missiles, and its night vision goggles free of the anxiety that China will make the rare earth world go dark.”

(Banner photo by Göran Kartläsarn/Flickr)

Allen Best is a long-time journalist based in Colorado. He can be found at http://mountaintownnews.net.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

If you enjoyed this article and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

— Allen Best reports on water, energy, and other issues in Colorado, the Great Plains, and the Intermountain West. A fourth-generation Coloradan, he has worked as a journalist since the 1970s. Since...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *