A majority of comment-writing hunters are resisting plans to extend hunting seasons and lift antler requirements for two premiere northwestern Wyoming mule deer herds. 

The regulations they seek to keep, however, will not achieve a chief goal of accelerating the herds’ recovery, biologists say.

The Sublette and Wyoming Range mule deer herds were hit hard by the 2022-23 winter’s long-lasting and “inverted” snowpack. The latter crashed, losing roughly two-thirds of its deer. 

Three years later, biologists say they’re seeing signs of recovery. Fawn ratios are impressively high, so are survival rates, and the populations are rebounding. 

“It was a devastating winter, by all accounts,” said Brandon Scurlock, wildlife management coordinator for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s Pinedale Region. “But we are bouncing back.”

Wyoming Game and Fish Department Habitat Biologist Troy Fieseler unscrews a GPS collar from a deceased yearling mule deer in the Wyoming Range in May 2023. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

The Wyoming Range Herd, for example, grew from a nadir of about 10,300 deer to 15,500 animals after the 2025 hunting season, Scurlock said. Although that’s still just about half of its pre-2022-23 winter population (29,580 deer), the herd’s resurgence has motivated the agency’s biologists and wardens to back off two hunting season changes made in the deadly winter’s wake. To placate concerned hunters and outfitters who were even voluntarily giving up their tags, Game and Fish shortened the season starting in 2023 and imposed a widespread requirement that mule deer bucks have at least four points or more on either antler to be huntable. 

This spring, the state agency proposed to mostly roll those measures back in its draft 2026 hunting regulations. Lengthened hunting seasons and no more antler requirements are both slated for the two herds, which dwell in 18 different hunt areas in northwestern Wyoming. 

“We think there’s some opportunity there,” Scurlock said. “We’re quick to shorten seasons in response to winter kill. We’re trying to encourage managers to liberalize [opportunities] as the population bounces back as well.”

The changes are not expected to impact the mule deer herds’ recovery whatsoever. 

Population trajectories in deer herds are based on does producing fawns, and those youngsters surviving. Neither female nor fawn mule deer can be legally hunted in either herd. Bucks, which are the subject of the hunting season changes, do not impact population trends unless sex ratios become extraordinarily lopsided. They’re not in the Sublette (43 bucks:100 does) and Wyoming range (38 bucks:100 does) herds. 

Nevertheless, most hunters who have taken the time to write Game and Fish commissioners are resisting the changes.

“I would like to propose that the antler restriction remain the same for the 2026 season for the Wyoming Range areas,” Afton resident Tristan Mack wrote in a public comment. “While we have 5,500 more deer, which is great progress, I fear that beginning to take away restrictions too soon may regress the progress that has been made.” 

Blake Gipson of Diamondville wrote that he’s “vehemently opposed” to the draft regulation changes. 

“With the Wyoming Range mule deer population still so low,” Gipson wrote, “I fail to understand why the state is both extending the season and removing the antler restriction, opening a larger portion of the herd to harvest.” 

Casper resident Tanner Fischer made a similar point. 

“Proposing to extend the season through October 4 while also changing it to ‘any buck’ is a step in the wrong direction in my opinion,” Fischer wrote. “Opening it to ‘any buck’ will put additional pressure on younger deer that should be allowed to mature and help rebuild the population.” 

But other hunters backed the proposed changes.

“Based on the data provided by Game and fish, these [antler] restrictions tend to be most beneficial over a short period — roughly three years — and can become counterproductive when extended beyond that timeframe,” wrote Cora resident Braxton Hamilton, who also supported extending the season length. 

Teton County resident Glenn Owings agreed, offering “strong support” for ending antler requirements: “That strategic effort has run its course, and it’s time to remove it.”

Game and Fish commissioners will make the final decision about hunting regulations for the Sublette and Wyoming Range mule deer herds — and all other Wyoming elk, deer and pronghorn herds — on Wednesday, April 22 in Casper. Meeting details are posted online at WGFD.wyo.gov/commission

After the slowest hunting season in 30 years, which came in the fall following the harrowing winter of 2022-23, Wyoming Range mule deer hunters are starting to find more success. Over the five hunting seasons leading up to the devastating winter, 33% of hunters were successful, and they killed an average of 1,661 buck mule deer.

In the fall of 2023, hunter success declined dramatically: Hunters killed an estimated 416 deer, with a 16% success rate. The picture improved somewhat during the 2024 season, when hunters killed 620 mule deer with a 21% success rate. Last fall, Wyoming Range mule deer hunters were 27% successful, killing 992 buck deer, according to harvest reports

It’ll likely take another few years for hunters to be as successful as they were before the 2022-23 winter, the deadliest in at least four decades. The complete recovery of the Wyoming Range Herd is possible, but hunters will need to be patient. 

“You can’t recover 70% of a population within a period of a couple years,” said Kevin Monteith, a University of Wyoming ecology professor who’s led a long-running study of the Wyoming Range Herd. “That’s just not possible.” 

Still, the herd’s population dynamics are looking promising. Since the 2022-23 winter, Monteith’s research crews have documented the heftiest fawns, the highest fawn survival rates and the fattest females since they started the research project in 2013. 

“The population is poised to grow,” Monteith said, “given all those factors.”

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *