Ciris Energy Inc. has agreed to pay a $1,500 fine and to perform water quality testing to settle a corrective action brought by the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. Ciris is one of two companies proposing to stimulate the microbial process that turns coal into gas in the Powder River Basin. Both Ciris and Luca Technologies believe the process can produce commercial quantities of gas in the basin, where coal-bed methane gas development has gone from boom to bust in the past decade.

Ciris performed several chemical injections on another company’s coal-bed methane gas wells in the basin in 2010, without the expressed approval of the Oil and Gas Commission. The matter was settled today during the commission’s regular monthly hearing.

Ciris also faces enforcement action for the same alleged violation by the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality which issued a “notice of violation” to Ciris on December 10, under the agency’s authority to oversee injections into “waters of the state.” Today, a Ciris representative confirmed that the company has agreed to pay a $25,920 penalty to DEQ.

Lynne Boomgaarden, who represents Ciris Energy in Wyoming, said there was confusion about whether sundry filing requirements were the responsibility of Ciris or the company that owns the wells, USA Exploration & Production. USA Exploration also agreed to a $1,500 fine to the Oil and Gas Commission, and to allow access to the wells for water quality testing. Boomgaarden said legislation that was passed this year should clarify regulatory requirements for the microbial gas production process.

“Ciris found itself in a fairly unusual situation,” Boomgaarden told commissioners, adding that there is some overlap between the Oil and Gas Commission and DEQ requirements. However, those issues are likely to be resolved through good communication.

From 2003 to 2010, Boomgaarden served as director of the Wyoming’s Office of State Lands & Investments, responsible for managing about 4 million acres of state trust land and minerals, including the leasing of state minerals. Boomgaarden also served as chairwoman of the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. She now works as an attorney for Schultz & Belcher LLP.

The microbial stimulation proposals by both Ciris and Luca Technologies face scrutiny from the Powder River Basin Resource Council, which advocates on behalf of many rural landowners in the region. Many of those landowners rely on the freshwater coal aquifer for domestic and stock water. They worry that various “nutrients” and chemicals used to stimulate the microbial process could degrade water quality and put human health at risk.

PRBRC staff members urged the commission, which includes Gov. Matt Mead, to apply a stringent water quality testing standard on the industry.

In a November, 2010, letter to DEQ’s Water Quality Division, Ciris Energy president Robert Downey disclosed that the company had injected 1,400 parts per million (ppm) ammonium chloride, 210 ppm sodium bromide, and 400 ppm acetate into the USA Exploration wells. Its injection slurry also included cobalt chloride and nickel chloride.

“The bromide is an inert, harmless tracer chemical. Sodium phosphate, potassium chloride and ammonium chloride all dissociate and and phosphate, potassium and ammonium ions are fully metabolized by indigenous microbes to build cell mass,” Downey wrote. “Cobalt chloride and nickel chloride are also metabolized fully by the indigenous microbes and used internally as biometal catalysts for cell growth and metabolic function. … All of these materials are fully consumed by the indigenous methanogenic consortia, leaving only modest amounts of sodium and chloride ions in the formation water.”

But PRBRC staff members said the state should perform its own chemical analysis to determine the potential for water quality impairment and human health risk.

“While Ciris claims that microbes consume all of these chemicals, we don’t know if that’s true,” said Jill Morrison, PRBRC staff member.

Contact Dustin Bleizeffer at 307-577-6069 or dustin@wyofile.com.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *