Committee kills measure to give state park officers death benefits

By Gregory Nickerson
— February 24, 2014
Glendo State Park. (Wikimedia Commons — click to enlarge)
Glendo State Park. (Wikimedia Commons — click to enlarge)

The Senate Appropriations Committee has killed House Bill 70 to provide disability and death benefits for state park law enforcement at the same level as other peace officers.

In public testimony, Bill Westerfield of Wyoming State Parks and Historic Sites noted that many of the officers in parks deal with the same issues and go through the same training as other peace officers. The job comes with additional risks, such as being on call 24 hours a day and working alone in remote locations that can be 40 miles from backup. On occasion they face dangerous situations, as evidenced by a 2009 incident in which a Glendo State Park officer was shot in the chest. The officer survived.

“The job of these peace officers has changed over the years. They are at more peril,” testified Sen. John Schiffer (R-Kaycee), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “These people can get hurt, and seriously hurt. If we are going to get them in the line of fire, lets provide for benefits.”

House Bill 70 would have diverted 1 percent of employee salaries into an account that would pay out benefits in the case of disability or death. The disability benefit would amount to 62.5 percent of the employees’ salary if injured on the job, and 50 percent if injured during an off-duty situation. Similarly, the death benefit would pay 62.5 percent of the salary plus 6 percent of the salary for each minor dependent, and 50 percent of the salary for death outside of work. Currently, there are only 21 state park law enforcement officers.

During committee action, Sen. Curt Meier (R-LaGrange) introduced an amendment for the contributions to the fund to be paid in a 50-50 split between employees and State Parks and Historic Sites. That change passed. However in a final vote the bill received two votes in favor and three opposed, meaning the measure will not be heard on the Senate Floor.

— Gregory Nickerson is the government and policy reporter for WyoFile. He writes the Capitol Beat blog. Contact him at

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.
REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Gregory Nickerson worked as government and policy reporter for WyoFile from 2012-2015. He studied history at the University of Wyoming. Follow Greg on Twitter at @GregNickersonWY and on

Leave a comment

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *