Cost estimates for the proposed Alkali Creek Dam in Big Horn County have jumped to more than double the original $35 million price tag.

It will take some $70 million to $75 million to build the dam and reservoir, the interim director of the Wyoming Water Development Office told legislators at an August committee meeting in Afton. The anticipated cost has already jumped once — from $35 million to $59 million in 2020. The Legislature appropriated that amount for the project.

Now the price has been revised upward again.

“Obviously, we’re going to need other funding,” Jason Mead told members of the Select Water Committee last month. “To move forward, we really need to figure out the funding first.”

To cover the increase, the office will likely apply for federal funds, Mead said. The probable source is the Bureau of Reclamation’s Small Surface Water and Groundwater Storage Projects Program, he wrote in an email.

Wyoming could be eligible for $15 million to $20 million from that grant program, Mead said. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provided a boost to that federal program.

Alkali Creek would be built from scratch on an intermittent stream in the Bighorn Basin above Hyattville. The reservoir would also use water diverted from Paint Rock and Medicine Lodge Creeks. 

As originally envisioned, the dam would be 108 feet high and 2,600 feet long. It would impound 7,994 acre-feet over 294 acres, although there’s a possibility it could be designed to impound another 900 acre-feet, Mead said.

Irrigators would be responsible for paying back $2.1 million in loans, a figure that remains unchanged despite the increase in anticipated costs.

Complex geology, escalating costs

The original estimate for the dam’s cost increased as a result of studies that revealed complex underlying geology and poor embankment material, among other factors. Increasing construction costs also factor in, as they have at a neighboring dam enlargement proposal that stalled after the Water Development Commission rejected the sole, high-priced bid.

That happened earlier this year when the commission rejected a $70-million bid to expand the Upper Leavitt Reservoir, originally estimated to cost $39 million. Inflation, high fuel prices, a COVID-19-restrained supply line and a paucity of workers combined to increase the anticipated cost, lawmakers said.

The Shell Valley Watershed Improvement District is also planning to apply to the BOR program for funding, Mead said.

The Leavitt Reservoir is north of Shell. The proposed Alkali Dam is to its south.

Plans are to rebid the Leavitt project, possibly breaking the construction program into several smaller bid packages to encourage competition, Mead said. No timeline has been set for that, however.

Meantime the state is facing challenges securing necessary easements for the Alkali Dam. Problems have arisen for land under part of the planned reservoir pool and portions of existing ditches that would be enlarged to fill the pool.

“We’re trying to help folks understand that we’re not here to impact their operation.”

Jason Mead, interim director of the Wyoming Water Development Office

“We’ve got new landowners that have moved into the area,” Mead told the Select Water Committee last month. “Some people sold and some people, new people, moved in that weren’t familiar with the project, and it’s been a bit challenging to bring everybody up to speed.”

Landowners who are reluctant are “generally not in favor of easements” or are worried about potential impacts to their property, Mead wrote. Some of their property is irrigated from the two creeks that would be tapped to fill the reservoir but are above the dam’s outlet and wouldn’t specifically benefit from reservoir water.

Project proponents are working to evaluate alternatives that would minimize impacts or provide offsetting benefits, Mead said. “We’re trying to help folks understand that we’re not here to impact their operation, we’re there to keep it whole, if not improve it,” he told the committee.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published.

  1. I’ve never heard of big project estimates ever coming even close to the actual price. It’s gotten to the point whenever I read about a new proposal and cost estimate I simply assume the actual cost is at least double.

  2. Please clarify for me. Isn’t Alkali Creek the one Atheon was discharging untreated production water into which then flowed into Badwater Creek and into Boysen? Thanks.

    1. No, different Alkali Creek. The one discharged to is in the Wind River Basin, above Wind River Canyon, this one is in Big Horn Basin.

    2. No this is above Hyattville in Big Horn county WWDC has been a great source of money in keeping up old infrastructure on irrigation systems all across the state it benefits all people in Wyoming

  3. Can they justify the need for the water ,9000 acre ft is nothing that would only supplement 3000 acres of ag ground and take water away from how many acres ? Unless the developers chop it up into small parcels of lots and make it a municipality so we can look like California .

  4. A ridiculous mis-appropriation of state resources, and a travesty to flood this beautiful area for the benefit of a few.

  5. A question to ask: How many rancher/farmers will benefit from a $70M+ Dam? I’m betting in the Paint Rock/Nowood district, very few and the “benefits” would be millions and millions per irrigator. Wow, wish some Govt. agency would shove millions of $ my way. Naw, time to finally scuttle this boondoggle as it’s not even worth interim director Jason Mead’s salary

    PS – hey D Haire, ANCHOR DAM….yes! don’t they ever learn?

  6. $75,000,000/8,000 (per Acre Foot (AF)) = $9,375 per AF
    Water in the Pacific Northwest is being leased for $100 – $200 per acre foot for in-stream flow for endangered salmon and steelhead.
    Whyomin Water Development Commission: “Fighting gravity since 1975”

    1. Ah, yes, Anchor Dam. My favorite white people welfare failure. But I trust the Commission to do that fiasco one better!