The Wyoming Department of Education released on Wednesday its school district guidance for shaping policies related to library books. It comes as districts are increasingly contending with book challenges from parents concerned about mature or explicit topics. 

Lacking legal teeth, the guidance is intended as a resource rather than a requirement, Wyoming Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder said. 

“I must admit that when I first heard about complaints of these graphic sexually explicit materials in books in our schools, I was skeptical,” Degenfelder said at a Capitol press conference. “But I promised Wyoming that I would investigate and address the issue. I did exactly that. And unfortunately, the concerns I heard as I traveled the state were well founded.”

On the campaign trail last year, Degenfelder stressed a local-control bent, telling voters local school districts should make decisions about library material. She re-emphasized that message Wednesday. 

“Nothing in the guidance we have developed bans any book or takes away any local control or forces districts to do anything,” Degenfelder said. 

Drawing upon policies already in place or under consideration in Laramie, Natrona, Park and Teton counties, the guidance includes example policies for definitions and restrictions, model processes for material selection and reconsideration in addition to opt-in or opt-out plans. 

The growing battles over books in Wyoming reflect a national surge in book challenges — which have disproportionately targeted LGBTQ+ content and material that touches on race. Degenfelder, however, said the guidance was “not meant to and does not discriminate with regard to sexual orientation or gender identity.

“Our schools should support all students in their journey toward academic achievement,” she said at the press conference. “Graphic and sexually explicit material in any form does nothing to advance that mission and ultimately distracts from it and costs us the confidence of parents in our state.”

Wyoming Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder (courtesy)

Stakeholders and details 

State education officials turned to people outside the agency to help craft the model policy.

“The cabinet of stakeholders that developed this document started with the premise that it was more important to explain best practices related to policy adoption and include real examples rather than to attempt to prescribe a specific policy template,” the guidance states. 

Degenfelder said cabinet members were selected to represent a wide range of backgrounds, views and geographic points from across the state. 

The 10 members include: Superintendent Jay Curtis, Park County School District No. 1; Maggie Unterseher, New Castle High School librarian; Taylor Jacobs, board member for the State Board of Education and Fremont County School District No. 1; Amber Pollock, former teacher and Casper City Council member; Christy Klaassen, Laramie County School District No. 1 board member; Ashlee Fischer, Gillette parent; Mark Lenhardt, Rock Springs teacher; Kathy Scigliano, Cheyenne parent; Superintendent Mark Broderson, Crook County School District No. 1; and Jeff Wallace, CEO of Wyoming Bank and Trust in Cheyenne. 

Before a district begins any work to establish or modify a library material policy, the guidance recommends the process include formalized stakeholder participation and should include school library professionals, teachers, administrators, legal counsel, parents, students and other community members. 

“Whatever process of selection is used, it is best to ensure that the committee represents all groups, and that an equitable selection process is followed,” the guidance states. 

From there, the guidance recommends five key components. “Definitions” comes first and is important for avoiding ambiguity, the guidance says, and likely to be a challenging one for districts to tackle, especially when it comes to terms that are subjective in nature.  

“The definition of ‘sexually explicit’ is a difficult one that we’ve seen … in court cases all the way to the Supreme Court, as we know from Justice Stewart, who famously said, ‘I know it when I see it,’” Degenfelder said. Stewart made the remark after being asked in 1964 for his test for obscenity.

In one example included in the guidance, Laramie County School District No. 1 is considering defining “sexually explicit content” as “textual, visual, or audio materials that depict sexual conduct or describe sexual conduct using more than a passing reference (such as the use of a sex-related expletive) or allusion.”

Next, the guidance offers recommendations for the process of selecting library materials. Generally, it suggests, library professionals rely on professional reviews and recommendations from staff, parents, students and the community. It also recommends districts create a form for patron requests and recommendations. 

At the press conference, WDE provided excerpts from challenged books, while the guidance included a model selection policy from Teton County School District No. 1 that evaluates library materials on the significance of the entire work rather than the individual parts. 

“Materials should be selected for their strengths rather than rejected for their weaknesses,” it states. 

Third, the guidance details how a district might develop a “prohibited content provision.” 

It encourages “a provision that expressly prohibits some of the defined material, such as material that includes sexually explicit content.” A ratings system or process via defined terms could be used, but districts should include stakeholders “in identifying prohibited material.”

In order to empower parents and guardians, the guidance also puts forth a “opt in and/or opt out” policy. The sample language the guidance uses comes from a draft policy Laramie County School District No. 1 is currently considering. It provides four options for parents or guardians to choose when completing the registration process — ranging from no access to sexually explicit materials to no access to any library materials. Consideration of the policy has not gone without controversy. It has drawn silent protests against the restrictions, the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle reported, and would contribute to “an atmosphere of distrust and hostility” for teachers and librarians. Supporters say it’s needed to weed out inappropriate materials. 

Lastly, the guidance suggests districts implement a “defined and transparent process for challenging the selection of material.” That could be accomplished, the guidance says, through a stakeholder committee and the use of content ratings and definitions. However, “it is important to ensure that any content ratings used do not include any specific viewpoints on the political or religious aspects of any material.

“Viewpoint discrimination is a violation of the First Amendment, and as such, any policies used must be free of these elements.”

What’s next

The guidance is only the beginning, Degenfelder said at the press conference. Her department plans to update the recommendations as districts create policies. 

“Further, the next step will be to form a stakeholder group of librarians in order to evaluate how to support them through training and resources and to ensure that their district policies are met, and that parents feel involved and understanding of the procurement process,” she said. 

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Book “challenges” are issued by the mentally challenged superstitious ones.

    I read Fanny Hill while in the 7th grade. A buddy had been loaned a copy by his father’s supervisor’s wife. The buddy reminded me that “mum” was the word. The book was no big deal, no worse really than the escapades of Fleming’s James Bond, which were popular novels at the time.

    I read plenty of other “risque” books during my high school days (’64-’68), and in the decades following. One of the worst books ever written (along with the Bible) in my opinion, was a racist screed, and came from my rural high-school’s library. I had forgotten its title and author before the end of the 70s. It was horrifying with its outright spewing of racial hatred and sexism, but worth reading just to learn how evil, fearful, and superstitious the book-banning crowd really is. Incidentally, the more I heard that a book should be banned, the more I wanted to read it…AND DID!


  2. Not a single teacher on Megan’s “cabinet.” One retired. That’s awesome. A banker? Really? Teachers could help this group understand the importance of academic freedom, the importance of thought, and how not to fear the sexual boogie man. However, those issues are not important in this discussion.

    You better ban their phones! They are watching videos of what you fear they may read about in a library book!!!

  3. Ah, balanced journalism. Thank you, WyoFile reporter Mullen!
    It’s good to to read your objective summary with key quotes from the WDE’s guidance. In regard to the objections to LCSD1-proposed policy: readers should skim the actual policy themselves, rather than rely on hysterical insults from detractors. To look at the Board’s policy proposal —$file/9.26.2023%20Chapter%20VII%20Section%2021%20(clean).pdf

  4. She knows this is a made up problem but knows she can ride it to greater wealth and political power. Shame on her.

  5. Viewpoint discrimination is the core of the controversy. Impossible situation where uptight parents seek to keep their little darlings “pure.”