Politicians and public commentators talk a lot about economic diversification in Wyoming, and with good reason: it’s likely the single most important issue for the long-term well-being of our state. If we don’t take it seriously, Wyoming’s future is bleak.
Opinion
For almost its entire history, Wyoming’s economy has centered around a few key industries. It began with agriculture in the late 1800s, as cattle and sheep formed the backbone of the state economy. By the 1920s, oil became a major economic driver, and it was not until the 1970s that the coal industry came to dominate. Looking at our state’s history holistically, we see that new industries rise and old ones recede over time. It is rare that our key historic industries disappear entirely, but the same factors that impact global markets impact Wyoming, and our industries develop and decline based on influences that are largely outside our control. This shows us that we cannot expect our “legacy industries” to support us forever, and we must be prepared to develop new key industries to drive our economy.
Beyond the simple reality that our core industries will change, there are other reasons to pursue economic diversification. First, it helps insulate our state from the “boom and bust” tendencies that reliance on a single industry causes. Markets fluctuate, and those fluctuations have big impacts on our state, particularly when it comes to the natural resource economy. For places with multiple industries and economic engines, fluctuations in a single industry are absorbed or offset by others. A decline in one does not necessarily mean a decline in all or in the economy as a whole. In the Wyoming economic landscape, however, a downturn in a single key industry can cause broad problems. Diversifying our economy can help smooth out the bumps of the ups and downs of our existing key industries.
Wyoming also experiences a very high rate of our young and our educated leaving the state to pursue opportunities elsewhere. We consistently lose more of our educated workforce than we bring in, and we especially lose higher than typical numbers of our Wyoming natives with college degrees. We suffer from a perception, fair or not, that there are not many good opportunities in Wyoming for college graduates. Expanding the range and type of economic options available to our younger workers is certain to keep more of our sons and daughters close to home.
Economic diversification is clearly needed and should be a primary focus of policymakers for the foreseeable future. The first step in tackling this problem is likely the hardest. We must change our attitudes. If we do not believe that diversification is something we want, we will never achieve it. We in Wyoming are proud of our heritage, and rightfully so. But we cannot let this reverence for our past keep us from looking to the future. Despite how it makes us feel, our major industries change, sometimes dramatically. Industrial lifecycles are finite. We should continue to support these industries and help them be as productive as possible for as long as possible, but it is economic suicide to exclude potential new industries for the benefit of our old ones. What if we had undertaken that course in the 1920s or 1970s? In either instance, our state would have floundered. We should not choose to flounder now.
The other attitude we must change is our skepticism, bordering on pessimism, about any suggestion that a new project or industry may be successful. A friend recently commented that Wyoming feels like it has lost its appetite for big ideas, and I worry that he may be correct. The part of our heritage that made Wyoming great was just what he alluded to — it was a place where common people could have big ideas. It was a land of opportunity, where we could build new things. We need to cultivate that mindset. There is still a lot of opportunity and room for big ideas here.
Once we have adopted the right mindset, the work begins. We have already built a very business-friendly tax environment. If we are losing out on opportunities and industries, it is not because they are over-taxed. Rather, our challenges lie in infrastructure, personnel and opportunity. We need to build the physical infrastructure to allow our businesses to succeed. We must cultivate the kind of livable and attractive communities that can attract the workforce to support these industries. And we have to identify what will and will not work in our particular environment. Wyoming will not be the next leader in shipbuilding or citrus farming, but it can be the next leader in something else.
It will not happen overnight and will not happen without hard work and vision. However, with our support and concentrated efforts, Wyoming’s future can still be bright.

Ever since I was in high school, and before we have educated our youth and then sent them to college and further their education, then they have had to go out of state to use what they have learned because we haven’t had the jobs needed to employ them. You only need to look at the Dow Jones to see the thousands of companies that have employed people. Our list has been limited to rail, oil and gas, trona and government jobs. I graduated high school in 1965 and UW four years later and came back to Wyoming. Our class had nearly a hundred graduates. Only a handful didn’t have to leave to find employment. When my kids graduated there were only a few that didn’t need to leave. I had a retail store and wanted to keep my kids home. There weren’t enough jobs to keep them in Wyoming. We have extracted mineral that is not a finite source of employment. I ran for office and was on the Uinta County economic development board promoting diversification with little success. I remember while running my opponents said they wanted to keep things just like it was. The mind set of the people of Wyoming needs to be changed. We have been the source of minerals and energy those minerals no longer provide what they once did. Solar and wind are both cuss words in Wyoming.
It is easy to see that Mr. Lenhart is not in business or development.
One of the main reasons there is not more economic diversification in Wyoming, are
the the local regulations that burden businesses and developers.
Businesses and developers spend hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to satisfy
many unnecessary and trivial regulations that are a result of grants from the federal government.
But don’t believe me, ask any contractor or developer in your town.
All of these extra costs get added to the final cost of a new home or building.
I commend Mr Lenhart on his courage while at the same time saying, this song has been being sung since I have lived in Wyoming, which is bordering on 30 years. We can all tear up, and tap our feet, while lifting our lit phones to croon along with Wyoming’s version of Kenny Chesney’s “Better Boat”, but we will leave the concert by jumping in our one-ton pick-ups because that’s the Wyoming Way. Sadly, we will never replace our cowboy hats with fuchsia hair, our cowboy boots with Doc Martins, and get tattoos that embrace the driving scream of Jane’s Addiction “Idiots Rule” (sorry to say, we need a few more with this mindset). Wyoming will vote R next fall despite the level of the candidate’s toxicity.
This is a very important policy recommendation for Wyoming — and well-presented. Wyoming’s legacy industries deserve to be remembered, respected and in some cases protected, but cannot be the backbone for our future. Thanks to the author! Next step is to develop steps to accomplish this — and elect legislators who will pursue these goals. The Governor’s list of goals developed for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding would be an excellent starting point, but perhaps with more emphasis on community-level actions. Perhaps we need another series of state-wide town meetings to talk about how to update this list and then figure out how to take action.
Lenhart’s thinking is pretty rational. However, he doesn’t mention the elephant in the living room – the ever right-moving legislature. They are the impediment to Wyoming’s embrace of new, and big ideas, and those that have them.
If I were a young person looking for somewhere to build a life about the only things I’d see that was attractive about moving to the State is the outdoor lifestyle it offers, the University of Wyoming and Laramie’s college town ethos. What repels me is the State’s attitudes towards abortion, smoking pot, gun rights, suicide, domestic violence, medicaid, it’s weird mix of agenda driven Christian nationalism, repressive attitudes evidenced in book banning in community and school libraries, and its lack of compassion towards the least well off among us. These impediments to moving to, or staying in Wyoming lie at the feet of the legislature.
And to change the subject a bit, I would be pleasantly surprised, and excited, to see Khale Lenhart run for Governor. My guess is there will be a tipping point in the near future where Wyoming will be ready for the kind of vision and thinking Mr. Lenhart shares with us.
Any politician that spouts this BS is full of you know what
What do you mean? What would you suggest? I don’t quite get your point.
What type of businesses / industries do you propose that Wyoming attract and what incentives or factors will bring them here? Let’s list some potential candidates and perhaps you can follow up with some concrete ideas on how they (or others) can be attracted.
1. Defense / Aerospace
2. Energy (ie renewables, nuclear)
3. Manufacturing (large scale)
4. Information Technology (data centers)
5. Healthcare (GP’s, specialists)
6. Financial (banking / trading / audit)
7. Retail
8. Tourism (outdoor recreation)
Why do people with economic mobility live where they live? Let’s list some of the reasons.
1. Career Opportunities
2. Cost of Living
3. Politics
3. Quality of Life (education, healthcare, cultural amenities, and recreation)
4. Housing (neighborhoods with appreciating property values)
6. Taxes
7. Climate / Environment
How strong is Wyoming on the Big Seven listed above and what can be done to improve our score?
Great opinion piece. I appreciate Mr. Lenhart’s attitude regarding being open to new ideas and industries for Wyoming’s future economic outlook. In your closing you mentioned citrus: coming from the state of Florida myself, we had a difficult time accepting the declining citrus industry for decades. However, learning to pivot and be open to other agricultural practices and new industries (especially in the energy producing category) has helped round out the economic engine in FL that encourages students to stay in their own state and contribute to the future. Best wishes for Wyoming’s planning ahead that starts with connecting your students with your various industries early on to help them connect their talents to their state’s growth and successful outlook.
Yes, so stop tilting at windmills and go Nuclear-powered.
This.