The vast majority of free-roaming horses occupying a vast swath of Wyoming’s Red Desert could be rounded up and trailered away to long-term pastures if Bureau of Land Management plans now being reviewed come to pass. 

Potential roundups could target thousands of animals in the Green Mountain, Stewart Creek, Antelope Hills, Crooks Mountain and Lost Creek herds, which dwell on approximately 753,000 acres north of Interstate 80. Collectively known as the “Red Desert complex,” the herds are separate from three other herds roaming the public-private “checkboard” portion of the Red Desert. BLM has long sought to entirely remove the three herds in the checkerboard but that plan is tied up in litigation and on hold until at least October

Instead of eliminating the Red Desert complex herds, the BLM seeks to knock down numbers to an “appropriate management level” to balance the “the needs of wildlife, livestock, recreation and the long‑term health of the range,” an agency spokesperson told WyoFile in an emailed statement. BLM personnel declined a verbal interview for this story. 

Documents accompanying BLM’s proposal contend that the nonnative free-roaming horses have impacted the Red Desert’s ecological health. 

“Rangeland resources within the complex have experienced adverse effects as a result of wild horse overpopulation,” states the evaluation report for the Stewart and Lost Creek herds. “Monitoring data specific to this area indicated that past excessive wild horse populations were linked to historical riparian degradation.” 

University of Wyoming-led research that included three of the at-issue herds — Crooks Mountain, Green Mountain and Stewart Creek — shows that overpopulated horses are correlated with declining juvenile sage grouse survival rates.

The Red Desert complex herds are overpopulated, at least based on the “appropriate management levels” established in the early 1990s. The goal is for the herds to include somewhere between 480 and 724 total animals, but as of early March the population was estimated at 1,970 horses and expected to grow to 2,300 by the time the herds are surveyed in the fall. 

Wild horses roam sagebrush in the Stewart Creek management area in 2008. (Bureau of Land Management)

Free-roaming horses face little natural predation and have high survival rates. The herds can grow by about 20% annually — a clip that enables them to double every five years or so. Data included in the evaluation report for the Green Mountain, Antelope Hills and Crooks Mountain herds shows that the Red Desert complex populations have largely followed that trend. Roundups in 2018 and 2020 knocked numbers in those three herds down to about 900 in 2021. By 2027, however, projections are for more than double that many horses. 

BLM is in the early “scoping” phase of its plans, and federal land managers have not divulged what exactly they’re proposing. The public notice only states that herd evaluations are more than 30 years old, need to be revised, and the agency’s Lander and Rawlins field offices “intend to gather excess wild horses” from the herds. Presumably, the roundups could target between 1,576 and 1,820 horses, which is the gap between the “appropriate management level” and the estimated fall 2026 population. 

Herd plan updates will address the “appropriate management levels,” rangeland health, population suppression methods, genetic diversity and sage grouse habitat, according to the evaluation reports.

Roundups to reduce wild horse numbers from public lands are routine business. This fiscal year, BLM is planning to gather up and trailer away more than 15,000 animals, according to the agency’s most recent gather and fertility control schedule. Planned activities in Wyoming are minimal: They include fertility control on 95 horses in the Stewart Creek and McCullough Peaks herds, and a “drive trap” roundup targeting removal of 286 animals from the Fifteenmile Herd. 

Black Hawk, Colo., resident Bill Carter documents a wild horse roundup in the Bureau of Land Management’s White Mountain Horse Management Area in August 2024. The BLM is moving forward with plans to completely eliminate the Great Divide Basin, Salt Wells Creek and a portion of the Adobe Town herds. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

The rounded-up equines cannot be intentionally killed because of protections afforded by the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act. Some horses find new homes through adoption programs, but most mustangs live out their days at private and government-run pastures, corrals and holding facilities

BLM is accepting public comment on its proposal through May 4. To submit remarks go to eplanning.blm.gov and search for “DOI-BLM-WY-R050-2026-0012-EA.” 

Wild horse advocates are encouraging the public to get involved. Carol Walker, writing in her Wild Hoofbeats blog, urged the BLM to consider restoring an old herd — Arapahoe Creek — that’s now managed for zero horses right in the middle of where the five existing herds roam. 

“It should be changed back to a Herd Management Area, recognizing that it is central to all the HMAs and an integral part of the Complex,” Walker wrote.

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *