A "boneyard" at the Eagle Butte coal mine north of Gillette, photographed in December 2019, is filled with old mining equipment. Eagle Butte was one of several coal mines to temporarily close in 2019 due to Blackjewel's bankruptcy. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Wyoming’s revenue outlook has improved by $845 million on rebounding markets for coal, oil and natural gas just as lawmakers prepare for the upcoming budget session in February. But there’s a dose of bad news in the state’s revenue analysis.

The wild swing from deficit projections during the 2020 pandemic shock to a more stabilizing revenue forecast today is a function of Wyoming’s outsized reliance on volatile fossil fuel markets, state revenue forecasters say. That fossil fuel volatility — beyond pandemic influences — will only increase as coal cedes its stabilizing state revenue influence to oil and natural gas.

“The current forecast relies heavily on the rebound in oil and natural gas pricing which results in higher [than coal] tax and royalty collections,” according to the Consensus Revenue Estimating Group’s October report. “However, volatility in oil and natural gas markets can reasonably be expected to have an outsized impact on state revenue collections. Coal production is forecast to continue its overall downward trend, despite the current, temporary increase in production and pricing.”

“Our total revenue portfolio is becoming more volatile, not less.”

Don Richards, Legislative Service Office budget and fiscal manager

Fiscal year 2021 revenues surpassed a January estimate by $248.1 million, according to CREG’s October report. The group also revised its revenue forecast for fiscal years 2022-2024 upward by $596.9 million. The total of $845.1 million is the amount of money expected to flow into the state’s general fund and budget reserve accounts during that period.

The revenue outlook to fund K-12 schools — which is largely tied to property taxes assessed on mineral production at the county level — also improved through 2024, by $368.3 million.

The revenue rebound is owed to recovering national demand for oil, natural gas and coal, Legislative Service Office Budget and Fiscal Manager Don Richards said. Long-term, however, coal will continue to play a diminishing role in the state’s budget, and that means Wyoming can expect more intense revenue swings as the norm, he said.

“Coal was a very stable revenue source compared to oil and gas,” said Richards, who also serves as CREG co-chairman. “The volatility of natural gas prices and the volatility of oil prices is much more dramatic, and Wyoming’s becoming more reliant on oil and gas because of the structural decline in coal.

“As a result,” Richards continued, “our total revenue portfolio is becoming more volatile, not less.”

Legislative Service Office budget and fiscal manager Don Richards. (WyoFile/Gregory Nickerson)

One example of the volatility difference between oil and coal, Richards said, is commodity pricing. The price for Wyoming coal — which is bound by U.S. utility markets — fluctuated between about $10 and $13 per ton during the pandemic shock and recovery, while the price of oil — subject to global markets and geopolitics — swug from below $0 per barrel to $80 per barrel.

Industry and state officials also worry about the ability to maintain robust oil and gas production in Wyoming due to increasing federal regulatory scrutiny.

For now, Powder River Basin coal producers are capitalizing on a recovering national economy that’s pushing U.S. electrical demand — Wyoming coal’s lone market. Electrical demand so far this year increased 22% over 2020 levels, according to the Energy Information Administration. However, long-term projections still warn of a permanently declining market for Wyoming coal.

“The downside is we went from 450 million tons [of annual coal production in 2008] down to 200,” House Revenue Committee Chairman Steve Harshman (R-Casper) told WyoFile in October. “That’s going to continue because of the retirement of coal plants, and we sell thermal coal. We’re not going to make it up by building car bodies or something.”

Budget preparations

All told, more than 65% of the upward revision in state revenue is “directly attributable to fossil fuels,” Richards said. Only Alaska and North Dakota are more reliant on fossil fuels, he said.

CREG’s revenue revision represents a dramatic turnabout from 2020, when forecasters predicted a budget deficit of $1.5 billion for the 2021-2022 biennium. This time last year, Gov. Mark Gordon had already instituted 10% budget reductions for most state agencies and suggested eliminating 380 state positions.

Rep. Steve Harshman (R-Casper) speaks during the 66th Wyoming Legislature’s general session March 11, 2021, in the House chamber inside the state Capitol. (Michael Cummo/Wyoming Tribune Eagle/Wyoming News Exchange)

But improving markets for Wyoming’s fossil fuel industries, combined with the promise of federal funds from President Joe Biden’s American Rescue Plan Act, helped sway state lawmakers during the 2021 regular session from making deeper cuts into budgets.

Despite the state’s continuing “structural” vulnerability to declining coal, Harshman said he hopes lawmakers will hold off from what he considered panicked budget-cutting during the pandemic’s economic shock.

“Who’s going to cut more?” Harshman said. “I want to add stuff back to mental health, substance abuse. We have [among] the highest suicide rates in the entire world.”

Conversely, it’s too early to talk about raising taxes, Harshman said. “What we need to do in Wyoming is smooth this thing out a little bit, and we’ve got to modernize our sales tax.” 

CREG, which the Wyoming Legislature relies on for revenue data and analysis to help craft a budget, will further refine its forecasts before the Legislature’s February budget session. Gov. Gordon will submit his budget proposal to the Legislature on Monday.

Dustin Bleizeffer is a Report for America Corps member covering energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Here we go again. Wyoming gets bailed out by a temporary change in market and federal largesse. Do we grab the opportunity to stabilize and diversify our economy? Of course not. We continue to do everything we can to remain in a past that was always too volatile economically to deserve the nostalgic halo we pretend is there.

  2. Governor Gordon suggested eliminating 380 state jobs. Rumor is he was thinking of the Wyoming Legislature when he suggested it… He’s got my vote.

  3. The ball was dropped on developing infrastructure to support businesses fleeing the blue state madness. We need to encourage hemp and ingestable marijuana farming as well as organic start-ups. Wyoming has an appeal to those who love nature and a huge amount of land to be cultivated. The weather demands that there be energy resources to protect crops from extreme cold. What steps are being taken to prevent “accidental” prosecutions of legal hemp farmers? What steps are being taken to secure the multi-billion dollar farming businesses that are being chased out of California by drought, wildfires and lawlessness? Time to stop pretending it’s the 1950s. There is money to be made that will support the growth of population that can diversify our technological sector and fund the STEM classes we need to compete in the 21st century. We cannot depend on a fickle and dysfunctional federal government for resources. These people are clearly incompetent and not interested in our economy. We are on our own and we need to look at this as if we just loaded our Conestoga wagons and are cresting the hill.

  4. Although this is “good” temporary news, neither the legislature, Governor, or US Congressional delegation have made any realistic attempts or notable gains to diversify the economy, that does not include energy.

    Collectively and for the record, all three have demonstrated they are unwilling to consider new large scale non energy opportunities. Thus the short and long term downward economic trends continue.

    Are there new opportunities for permanent economic growth? Yes. Can it be in addition to coal and cows? Yes. Can it happen with the current leadership in the State and be supported by the Wyoming Congressional delegation? No.

    Its a simple question. After 12 years of Mead and Gordon, what significant progress has been made to diversify the economy through renewable non energy sources? Yeah, you already know the answer. Have they earned four more years?