Members of the Wyoming Conservation Corps crew work on the Headquarters Trail Ridge reroute on the Medicine Bow National Forest on Pole Mountain just east of Laramie. The crew replaced a section of damaged and unsustainable trail with new trail along a ridge with a view. Headquarters Trail is a National Scenic Trail. (Tim Young)

State lawmakers are considering a first-of-its-kind fundraising measure: Charge hikers, bikers, horseback riders and others for using trails. At least one prominent outdoor recreation user group is on board.

A mandatory $10 annual permit fee paid by users of non-motorized, “natural-surface” trails would support public-land trail systems across Wyoming, advocates told lawmakers eyeing a draft trail-fee bill.

The bill could raise $1 million a year for Wyoming trails, even those trails on federal lands, according to information presented to the Legislature’s Travel Recreation Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee. As a draft bill is re-worked, backers say Wyoming outdoorswomen and -men who enjoy non-motorized trails are not opposed to paying a fee that would support creation and maintenance of recreational routes — the same way snowmobilers and ATV riders contribute funds through machine permits.

Today, “there’s no funding for non-motorized trails,” Domenic Bravo, the administrator of the Wyoming Outdoor Recreation Office, told WyoFile in an interview. Trail users have mixed feelings about a fee, however.

“Some are very bought-in,” Bravo said. “For others, just the idea of paying a fee to use a trail is concerning.”

Washakie District Ranger Steve Schacht walks along Worthen Reservoir on the new Upper Brewers Trail on an inspection tour. Wyoming Pathways and local partner the Lander Cycling Club led the construction of 3.7 miles of new hiking, biking and horse trail that now connects the Fossil Hill trailhead with the Sheeps Bridge and Worthen Trailhead on the Shoshone National Forest. (Tim Young)

Tim Young, the executive director of Wyoming Pathways who testified before the committee in Evanston last month, said the fee is “an opportunity to improve our livability in our communities.”

He outlined the lack of public funds and trail crews needed to keep up with use. Federal agencies are cash-strapped, Young said. They have massive trail-maintenance backlogs with as much as three-quarters of Forest Service trails in disrepair, he said. Public agencies have been unable to plan for the non-motorized trails that are in demand by equestrians, mountain bike riders, hikers, runners and others.

“Many of them [national forests] have lost their trail crews, their trails supervisors,” Young told the committee. The Bureau of Land Management, “can’t even give us a list of the entire trails in Wyoming.”

“The need is pretty dramatic,” Young said. “The [funding] hole is so big I’m going to support this.”

First-of-its-kind trail fee?

The draft bill (see below) says that any adult that uses a “designated” non-motorized trail in Wyoming “shall annually obtain a non-motorized recreational trail permit,” costing $10. The bill would create an account to be operated by the Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources, which would designate trails in the system and furnish numbered permits. Permits wouldn’t be required where other fees, like parking or parks admission, are already in place.

The bill would allow individual users and user groups to document volunteer trail maintenance or work time in exchange for a permit.

The bill would apply to and support “natural-surface trails,” only, not paved paths and sidewalks.

Adam Buck, owner of Pathfinder Trail Building, works through a rocky ridge while building the new Upper Brewers Trail on the Shoshone NF near Lander. (Tim Young)

People shouldn’t worry about potential path police Bravo said. “We didn’t even think about the penalty,” Bravo said. “We’re not going to sit there and hire a bunch of park rangers.”

Instead, Bravo believes marketing could convince people, even tourists, to pay the $10 “because it means something.”

The volunteering element of the bill is “critical,” Bravo said, but it alone can’t provide for the system of trails Wyoming needs. “You still need cash,” he said.

If adopted, the bill could be the first of its kind nationwide, Young said. “I don’t believe any other state has a mandatory fee. Wyoming would be pioneering a new approach of how to take care of its public trails. This would be the first person-based, non–motorized trail fee in the country.”

A provision in the draft to divert 10 percent of the revenue raised to the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust Account has drawn fire. Critics instead want to provide a way to make a contribution to that account voluntary.

Trail users may be willing to pay

Trail users have shown they’re willing to pony up for well-maintained routes, said Rep. Marti Halverson (R-Etna), a member of the committee considering the bill. While she’s generally skeptical of increasing taxes and fees, “I cannot say I have never voted for a fee increase,” she said in an interview.

When officials proposed to boost snowmobile fees, “I heard from 16,000 snowmobilers from around the state,” Halverson said; “Please raise the fee.”

Berm baby berm. A mountain biker rides a trail near Cody. Purpose-built trails are designed specifically for an activity, such as this one for mountain biking. (courtesy John Gallagher)

“It was all going to trail grooming,” Halverson said. “I know the users are willing to contribute to trails and maintenance.”

But while trail-users — even those using non-motorized trails — may be willing to pony up, “I don’t think they should be the only ones,” Halverson told WyoFile. “I have already heard from folks who say there’s no reason for Wyoming or Wyomingites to be subsidizing trail work on public land.

“I take that to heart that just because the Medicine Bow National Forest doesn’t have a trail crew doesn’t mean that Wyoming should be paying for trails,” she said.

“So, I’m getting some push-back from my constituents. They want the U.S. Forest Service to pay something. There is ample opportunity for the Forest Service to take advantage of the resource to raise the funds necessary to meet the demands of the outdoor recreationalists in this state — and the visitors.”

Young sees it slightly differently. “Congress and the Forest Service should be providing much better funding for our trail system,” he said. “Congress has not done its job.” Nevertheless, the bill should be revised to require a federal matching grant, Young wrote in remarks to the committee.

Kerry Strike rides in the Sunlight Basin area near Cody. A new plan from the Forest
Service will add trails on the Shoshone National Forest, but also close trails like this one, that are not part of the official trail system. (John Gallagher, Park County Pedalers)

Regardless of any failed responsibility, Wyoming Pathways partnered with the Shoshone National Forest to create the new Upper Brewers Trail near Lander and with the Medicine Bow National Forest to rebuild damaged trails on Pole Mountain between Laramie and Cheyenne, Young wrote the committee. In all, the projects constructed about 6 miles of trails and cost $220,000, much of it funded privately through grants and aided by significant volunteer work, his Aug. 30 letter read.

In Jackson Hole trail advocates kick in $350,000 a year in cash and volunteer value, he said. Evanston’s Bear River Outdoor Recreation Alliance aids the Forest Service and Evanston Parks and Recreation District with Nordic skiing, mountain biking, hiking, river and equestrian use around Uinta County. In the Cody area, Young said, Park County Pedalers, best known for their mountain-bike trails, have invested $400,000 in a trail network on city and BLM land.

A fee would give motor-free travelers a louder voice

Non-motorized trail users could leverage their funds and fundraising in a heretofore-blocked avenue if they begin paying fees, Young said. By contributing financially to trail maintenance, non-motorized trail users could strengthen their arguments when seeking a share of the federal trail funds distributed to Wyoming.

The federal Recreational Trails Program funds trail work through the Wyoming State Trails Advisory Council. Since 2013 Young has complained that the state council “unfairly restricts” money that the federal government earmarks for “diversified trails” — meaning those for several different user types. Federal guidelines allow the funds to be spent on a non-motorized “diversified trail,” such as trail for skiing, hiking and fat-biking. But the Wyoming council, by policy, spends the funds only on trails that include a motorized component.

Never miss a story — donate to WyoFile’s Fall Fund Drive

“Wyoming is the only state in the nation that requires motorized use in all diversified projects” Young wrote the trails council in 2015. The rule is “an unfair bias against non-motorized projects,” he wrote. “This unnecessary requirement is in conflict with the clear language of the federal law and should be removed.”

For Outdoor Office chief Bravo, a trail fee “would definitely open the door for those … conversations,” with the trails council. “If everybody is paying into the process, it’s easier to get fair balance in the programs,” he said.

(A typo in this story was corrected Sept. 25 — Ed.)

Trail Fee Draft 9 18 (Text)

Avatar photo

Angus M. Thuermer Jr.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at or (307)...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. A $10 annual permit seems perfectly fair. I enjoy using the trails and want them maintained.

  2. I am disappointed, Dominic Bravo, for basically stabbing the equine users of Wyoming in the back.. It’s obvious that the mountain bike groups have won you over, after you came to our State meeting this spring telling us we’re going to equally represented..
    The Wyoming Backcountry Horsemen of America do HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of DOLLARS $$$$ of volunteer trail clearing and maintenance EVERY YEAR.
    Thanks for mentioning our hard working organizations.

  3. The obvious answer to funding trails maintenance is to spend the tax money we already contribute to the federal Recreational Trails Program. It looks to me that it just takes the Wyoming State Trails Advisory Council to change their policy..

  4. Hunters and anglers should not have to pay an extra fee just to get to their recreation destination when they have already paid fees for licenses. There should be an exemption for individuals who have purchased hunting or fishing licenses in the state.

  5. Stupid. Wyoming has enough money to make stuff free.. Including water and the Fairgrounds in Casper/Natrona. I heard children couldnt get water this year.

    We need to be ashamed of our state. They pay thousands to look like Cleveland in the yellowstone district but cannot afford to give children water….and now this?! Priorities people!

  6. I’m down with this. Lead by example! Seniors and handicapped hikers deserve a modified fee, however.