Wyoming Capitol Outlook; Good sense prevails in Cheyenne

Geoff O’Gara of Wyoming PBS  penned this Wyoming Capitol Outlook post at the close of the winter session. O’Gara says that lawmakers eventually tossed out the silly and vindictive bills and gave serious consideration to Wyoming’s most pressing business.

As a sometime critic of Wyoming’s part-time “citizens” legislature – cramming so much lawmaking and money-spending into just a few weeks – I’ve got to admit: serious thinking and sensible decisions often prevail. And so it seems in 2012.

Geoff O'Gara

The media – Wyoming PBS included – focus on the sensational or goofy stuff: doomsday bills and gay marriage and wolves in New York City’s Central Park. But in the end – often at the very end – the legislators toss that stuff aside and work on what matters.

So, shallow headline-grabbing stuff – some of which would have been vindictive and damaging – has mostly been defeated. For example:

— drug testing for recipients of welfare (HB 82): Disguised as a cost-cutting tactic, this bill would have subjected a few hundred recipients of Wyoming’s successful back-to-work program (POWER) to expensive drug tests which, if positive, would kick people out of the program, despite the fact that other state’s have found as little as two percent (Florida) drug violations in similar programs;

— the “doomsday” bill (HB  85): A task force to study how to keep Wyoming afloat while the federal government collapses, including state currency and (in one facetious amendment) an aircraft carrier of our own – Rep. Dave Miller’s bill was perfect fodder for winking national press coverage, but the House voted it down 30-27 (close!) on third reading.

And some of the serious stuff that required long hours and complex formulas and language was dealt with and passed. For example:

— education accountability (SF 57): despite open squabbling between the legislature and Superintendent of Public Instruction Cindy Hill, the solons kept their eye on target, approving a plan to begin evaluating whether a decade of big investments in public education are paying off by improving students’ grasp of the knowledge and skills they’ll need to succeed;

— public records (SF 25): it will be a burden on local government, no question, but this legislation will allow citizens (and the media) to see what goes into government decision-making, by making communications like emails and “hand-outs” part of the public record, when they relate to policy-making. Despite efforts to amend the bill to block access to such information, transparency triumphed.

And some of the important stuff that was too complicated to fit in a headline – but would have benefited the wrong folks at the wrong time – was dissected and stopped:

— the coal tax change (HB 38): the coal industry wanted to change the complex calculations of mine-mouth coal prices, which determines how much severance tax the state gets – the new formula would indeed have been simpler, and supposedly “revenue-neutral,” but the number-crunchers found that down the road, the state would lose millions. Despite hearing-rooms full of industry lobbyists, the Senate forced the proposal to be withdrawn;

— the aquifer land deal (SF 93): Laramie residents want the state to acquire a ($15 million) chunk of ranchland that would provide a mountain-biking, dog-walking swath of open space connecting the University of Wyoming campus to national forestlands in the east… oh yeah, and protecting part of an acquifer that supplies city water. With powerful Senate Appropriations Chair Phil Nicholas pushing for it, they had a chance, but the deal smelled fishy (the landowner was a Nicholas client), and the effort failed.

Now, I’m not saying the legislature is perfect or even semi-perfect. They “kicked the can down the road” – a favorite phrase this year – on issues like highway funding (the state’s costly but essential road system has no systematic revenue stream, like water development does) or health care (the state’s hemorrhaging costs for Medicaid and other programs got a band-aid and another year of “study” before cuts will be faced).

But it has to be said that despite the heavy workload, low pay, and short sessions, in most cases good sense has prevailed in Cheyenne.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. So legislation to defend — or in this case grant — a basic human right like the right to marry the person that you love and to whom you have made a lifetime commitment — is mere “sensational or goofy stuff.”

    I’m glad that I live in Canada.