This lithograph, “Attacking the Grizzly Bear” was likely based on a George Catlin oil painting. But the title of the original image was “Grizzly Bears Attacking Indians on Horseback,” raising questions about why it was changed and what the real relationship between bear and man was.

American artist George Catlin, who lived from 1796 to 1872, preserved hundreds of scenes and portraits of the American West as westward expansion forever transformed it.

A Pennsylvania native, he practiced law for a short time before turning to art and the frontier. His distinct, sometimes childlike renderings fulfilled a lifelong desire to document disappearing cultures and landscapes. Among his best-known subjects are wildlife and Native Americans.

As Wyoming grapples with the idea of hunting grizzly bears — 42 years after they were first protected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a threatened species — a Catlin piece harkens to formerly wild times.

The print above, “Attacking the Grizzly Bear,” is a hand-colored lithograph from the artist’s 1844 North American Indian Collection. It was published in London that year, is about 12 by 18 inches and has since been popularized on everything from T-shirts to mouse pads, coffee mugs and miniskirts.

Such lithographs were often based on more formal works, and “Attacking the Grizzly Bear” has such a history.

Catlin sketched in the field and later made real paintings. In the winter of 1832-33 he put his brush to the canvas to produce an oil painting that is the precursor of the lithograph. A gift of Mrs. Joseph Harrison, Jr., the original 24- by 29-inch painting is the property of the Smithsonian American Art Museum.

And it is titled “Grizzly Bears Attacking Indians on Horseback.”

As the image was transposed from oil-on-canvass to hand-tinted lithograph 11 years later, the title was changed to have the Indians doing the attacking.

The prospect of hunting the powerful, quick, robust and sometimes aggressive grizzly with spears and clubs, even from horseback, would seem daunting. Although grizzly claws have been used as native jewelry and totems, many tribes proclaim a spiritual relationship with the grizzly bear and fight the prospect of trophy hunting today.

Never miss a Photo Friday — subscribe to WyoFile’s free weekly newsletter

The change of the title raises questions. Would 19th century Native Americans have sought to hunt a grizzly, let alone take on two while lightly armed? Did Indians hunt grizzly bears widely? Was this an encounter in which grizzlies were defending a kill, or reacting to a surprise trespass? Would a horse linger around to suffer an attack? Did popular but stereotyped notions about Native Americans lead to the title’s change?

And finally, how will Wyoming’s contemporary culture and customs regard and treat the grizzly bear?

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *