High Plains Initiative releases final document

The High Plains Initiative [HPI] recently released its final document, making it available on the Building the Wyoming We Want website.

The document’s release concludes a 16-month regional planning process in Platte and Goshen counties. HPI’s final document is 48 pages long. It contains six chapters: Introduction, Public Process, Values, Population and Land Use Trends, Alternative Growth Scenarios, and Conclusions.

The mission of HPI is stated as: “Thinking together about what we want this region to be like for our children and grandchildren.”

On page three, HPI committee members expressed their hope that the document would be useful in helping elected officials maintain safe and friendly communities without resorting to intrusive regulations or diminishing property rights. Growth in Platte and Goshen counties has been static for decades. The authors of the document make a case that planning is needed in light of the region’s potential growth from wind and oil development.

Planning is also important if a boom does not come: “Even if our counties continue to experience flat or declining population, our communities still face hard decisions on how to pay for aging infrastructure with a limited revenue stream,” according to the document. (Page 3).

On page 15 the HPI Executive Committee acknowledged that the public strongly valued property rights, low taxes, and minimal regulation: “Although these values were not identified in the initial [summer 2010] survey, the HPI Steering Committee addressed these concerns in their discussions and they are noted in this report.” (Page 8).

The document also noted that public input: “changed the visioning process to better fit the region.” (Page 17.)

A listing of the financial supporters of BW3 and HPI, and a list of Platte and Goshen County residents who served on the steering committee can be found on pages 44-47.

Read the full report by downloading this PDF.

— Gregory Nickerson, WyoFile writer

Gregory Nickerson worked as government and policy reporter for WyoFile from 2012-2015. He studied history at the University of Wyoming. Follow Greg on Twitter at @GregNickersonWY and on www.facebook.com/GregoryNickersonWriter/

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *