A silhouette of a woman holding a baby in a field at sunset
Home-visiting programs are intended to support at-risk families with new babies. (Jake Guild/Flickr)

Bipartisan federal legislation to increase funding for home-visiting programs that serve hundreds of Wyoming families became law Thursday when President Joe Biden signed the $1.7 billion federal spending package. 

Home visits involve professionals making house-calls on expectant families and those with newborns to provide support, advice and health checkups. The service is primarily offered to at-risk residents facing challenges like lower incomes or a history of abuse, neglect or drug abuse. 

A new law tucked into the federal funding package is the Jackie Walorski Maternal and Child Home Visiting Reauthorization Act of 2022, named after the Indiana congresswoman who died in a car accident earlier this year. 

The legislation increases the base amount for the Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program from $300 million annually to $400 million, and provides additional matching grant funding over the next five years

Why it matters

Studies have shown that certain home visiting programs can translate to better outcomes for children and are cost-effective.

“The largest benefits from evidence-based home visiting come through reduced spending on government programs and in­creased individual earnings,” a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services report found. 

The Wyoming Department of Family Services reported that its home-visiting program supported 243 families in the 2020-21 program year.

Who said what

Hundreds of child welfare organizations signed onto a letter in March asking members of Congress for many of the changes that the new law will provide, including doubling the amount set aside for tribes from 3% to 6%. 

“Historical and ongoing inequities within [American Indian and Alaska Native] communities have only been amplified by COVID-19,” the letter stated. “Currently, Tribal MIECHV receives $12 million annually for the more than 600 eligible Tribes and Tribal-serving organizations.”

An increase in tribal-specific home-visiting funds could help programs like one on the Wind River Indian Reservation that has faced its own funding troubles in recent years. 

The history

Congress created the MIECHV Program in 2010, but it was set to lapse on Sept. 30. 

U.S. Rep. Danny Davis (D-Illinois) introduced the legislation to reauthorize MIECHV and increase its funding on Sept. 19, but the bill didn’t move for nearly two months. 

Like many other federal programs, MIECHV hitched a ride with short-term funding packages meant to avoid a government shutdown and buy time for Congress to agree on a larger spending package. 

The legislation passed the House 390-26 on Dec. 2 with support from Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney before being lumped into the $1.7 trillion spending package. 

That home visiting bill had 186 cosponsors, including 85 Republicans. None were members of the Wyoming delegation.

What comes next

The new resources going to MIECHV programs have some strings attached. 

That includes annual reports to support a new “‘outcomes dashboard’ to help Congress and the public track MIECHV’s success in improving family outcomes in every state or territory,” according to House staff

At the same time, the legislation specifies that it wants to “reduce administrative burden” by focusing more on family outcome data than accounting at local sites.

For tribes specifically, the law aims to lower barriers by “exploring, in consultation with tribes and tribal organizations, ways to reduce administrative burden, respect sovereignty, and acknowledge the different focus points for tribal grantees.”

Madelyn Beck reports from Laramie on health and public safety. Before working with WyoFile, she was a public radio journalist reporting for NPR stations across the Mountain West, covering regional issues...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *