House committee passes bill to transfer duties of Superintendent of Instruction

By Gregory Nickerson
— January 22, 2013

The House Appropriations Committee unanimously passed Senate File 104 after hearing nearly two hours of public testimony Tuesday evening. The legislation would transfer duties of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to an appointed director.

Committee members listened attentively and asked questions, but the testimony did not seem to influence their votes. The bill now goes to the House for three rounds of debate.

Those who testified came from many corners of the state. Recent high school graduate Parker Jackson delivered a pointed criticism of the bill, calling it, “an easy way out for members of the legislature who wish that someone else had won the election.”

Jackson’s comments received a round of applause from opponents of the bill listening to an audio feed in a room upstairs from the proceedings. Jackson is an intern for Rep. Allen Jaggi (R-Lyman).

Rae Lynn Job, a former Senator education administrator in Rock Springs, spoke in favor of the measure. She noted that the administrators of the Department of Health and the Department of Family services are both appointed officials. “We need to hire the best person we can,” she said.

The transfer of administrative duties from an elected official has precedent in Wyoming. According to committee member Rep. Sue Wallis (R-Recluse), the state removed duties from the elected state auditor in the late 1980s.

Former Wyoming Department of Education employee Roger Clark also spoke against the bill. He named several instances in which Department of Education superintendents Trent Blankenship and Cindy Hill disregarded the directives of the legislature.

“Apparently the Superintendent of Public Instruction can pick and choose what legislation she wants to pursue, which is not an option for members of the executive branch in our government,” he said.

Following testimony, Appropriations Committee Chairman Rep. Steve Harshman (R-Casper) quickly worked through the bill with his fellow committee members. They offered no changes and unanimously passed the bill 7-0.

Upstairs from the committee room, Becky Vandeberghe of WyWatch Family Action immediately emailed an update on the vote to members of her group.

The speed of the bill’s passage comes after months of extensive deliberations by interim committees and endorsement from Senate leadership.

Up to this point the House co-sponsor of the bill and Education Committee Chairman Rep. Matt Teeters (R-Lingle) has stood on the sidelines of the debate. Now that the bill has moved to the House floor Rep. Teeters will likely lead discussion on the bill.

Gregory Nickerson is the government and policy reporter for WyoFile. To read more of his posts visit the Capitol Beat landing page. Contact him at

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Gregory Nickerson worked as government and policy reporter for WyoFile from 2012-2015. He studied history at the University of Wyoming. Follow Greg on Twitter at @GregNickersonWY and on

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Comment: This is being done the wrong way, imo. They should amend the constitution to make it an appointed position.

    Questions: In the precedents mentioned, were they done in the same manner? What will happen to the elected Sec of State position? Will we have two “departments” then? Is this the smaller government us Republican strive for?

    Comment: Legislators seem pretty high on their horse when it comes to “accountability”. Let’s hold them accountable during the next election cycle. Remember they’re taking away one more bit of voter choice. Chipping away at local control bit by bit.