House committee hears heated testimony on marriage equality, passes domestic partnerships

Video streaming by Ustream

(Audio begins at 20:00. Sen. Bruce Burns at 37:40. Rep. Lynn Hutchings at 01:11:15.)

By Gregory Nickerson
January 28, 2013

The House Corporations, Elections, and Political Subdivisions Committee today (Monday, January 28, 2013) heard testimony on two controversial bills related to marriage equality.

House Bill 169 — Marriage-definition would have defined marriage as a relationship between two “natural persons” rather than between one man and one woman. The measure failed with a vote of four in favor and five opposed.

Picture 2

House Bill 168 — Domestic partnerships-rights and responsibilities would legalize domestic partnerships between two people in Wyoming. That bill passed by a vote of 7 to 2.

The audience was divided almost equally among those for and against the measure. Debate lasted nearly two hours. A cadre of nationwide Twitter followers commented on the debate using the #wyleg hashtag. Rep. Dan Zwonitzer (R-Cheyenne) used a mobile device to broadcast the testimony on USTREAM.

Rep. Lynn Hutchings (R-Cheyenne) spoke against the marriage definition bill, saying no comparison can be made between the sufferings of those seeking interracial marriage and those seeking same-sex marriage. “Please stop carpetbagging on our civil rights movement,” Hutchings said.

Hutchings is an African-American freshman legislator and past lobbyist for the Wyoming Family Coalition.

As Hutchings’ delivered her testimony she sat next to a stoic Rep. Cathy Connolly (R-Laramie), a bill sponsor and the only openly gay member of the Wyoming legislature. In House floor sessions the two sit at neighboring desks and interact in a collegial manner.

Sen. Bruce Burns (R-Sheridan) spoke in favor of domestic partnerships, saying HB 168 is not necessarily a gay rights bill, because it would allow any two people to live together in a legal contract, including siblings.

The debate represented the latest skirmish in an ongoing marriage equality battle between social libertarians and evangelical conservatives in Wyoming. Marriage equality advocates considered the committee’s passage of the domestic partnerships bill as a major victory.

House Bill 168 now faces three rounds of debate in the House. To become law it would need to repeat the process in the Senate and earn the Governor’s signature.

A stream of the full debate is available above.

— Gregory Nickerson is the government and policy reporter for WyoFile. He is based in Cheyenne during the 2013 legislative session. Contact him at greg@wyofile.com.
REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.
 
If you enjoyed this story and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.
 
For information on how to contact your legislator during the session, click here.

Gregory Nickerson worked as government and policy reporter for WyoFile from 2012-2015. He studied history at the University of Wyoming. Follow Greg on Twitter at @GregNickersonWY and on www.facebook.com/GregoryNickersonWriter/

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *