House denies introduction of bill to increase Game and Fish license fees

by Dustin Bleizeffer
— February 10, 2014

This afternoon the Wyoming House voted down introduction of legislation (26 ayes to 32 nays) that would have increased Game and Fish license fees — the second year in a row that a license fee increase has been denied.

Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile editor-in-chief
Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile editor-in-chief

Conversely, the Senate approved introduction of SF 45, a bill to shift the cost of the Game and Fish department’s grizzly bear management program and the cost of health insurance increases for department employees to the state’s General Fund. That bill would help free up approximately $5 million in the portion of the Game and Fish budget that is supported by license fees.

“I’m disappointed,” Catherine Thagard, coordinator for the Wyoming Sportsmen’s Alliance, said of the defeat of HB 31 (license fees). “But, from my perspective, this is just the beginning of the discussion. … We need sustainable support of Wyoming’s wildlife resource.”

Last year’s defeated license fee increase was for 20 percent, while this year’s legislation called for a 10 percent increase.

The Wyoming Sportsmen’s Alliance formed in response to the defeat of license fee increases in the 2013 legislative session. In the run up to the 2014 session, the Wyoming Sportsmen’s Alliance pointed to new polling that suggests 63 percent of Wyoming residents support an increase in license fees.

A steadfast opponent of license fee increases, Wyoming Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, has argued that a fee increase cannot be justified until the Game and Fish department makes clear its priorities, goals and conducts a detailed cost-benefit analysis of programs within its budget. “They (license fee increase supporters) either don’t understand it or they’re afraid to do the cost-benefit analysis,” Wyoming Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife executive director Bob Wharff told WyoFile after the House vote on Monday afternoon.

Wharff said his organization doesn’t want to see the Game and Fish Department suffer, and said that it would support license fee increases if the cost-benefit analysis can be made. “We need to do a program by program assessment.”

Wyoming lawmakers imposted $6.6 million in combined cuts to the Game and Fish Department’s 2013 and 2014 budgets — without the offset of the license fee increase — resulting in the closure of public lands access and youth recruitment programs, and resulting in a smaller staff. Many fear the cuts, in addition to pending cuts for 2015 and beyond, may seriously hamstring the amount of in-the-field enforcement and biology research, potentially diminishing Wyoming’s wildlife resource, which sportsmen argue is at the core of Wyoming’s $2.9 billion annual tourism and travel industry.

(Click here to read the full story that followed)

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.
REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer is a Report for America Corps member covering energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Why should the entire burden of the Game and fish fall on hunters and fishermen? What about photographers that make a living on our wildfire? How about the stores that sell rubber tomahawks to tourists that come to see the wildlife? How about anyone but the hunter and fisherman picking the tab? CAn we even discuss it? As a hunter I paid for wolves – eagles black footed ferrets– I’m paid out– I guess I ‘ll hunt without a license—