As a lifelong Wyoming hunter, I, like so many others I’ve spoken to since, was totally disgusted when I first read the news stories and saw the images of the torture and killing of a young wolf in Daniel, Wyoming. I was overwhelmed with outrage over the disturbing way this seriously injured animal was paraded around. Was there nothing we could do to stop this kind of torturous cruelty? 

Opinion

The realization that Wyoming citizens had to stand up to defend our reputation of decency and respect for wildlife spurred the creation of the Wyoming Wildlife Coalition.

WWC is bringing Wyoming people together from different fields to create wildlife solutions on issues where unity can be achieved. We are hunters, ranchers, wildlife organizations, animal advocates and citizens who seek to draw the line on wildlife cruelty and want to stop the unethical and unsportsmanlike practice of running down and killing wildlife and predators, with motorized vehicles.

A poll conducted in April showed 71% of likely voters in Wyoming believe the actions taken against the wolf in Daniel were acts of animal cruelty, and 73% do not believe a snowmobile should be used to strike, injure, or kill wildlife, including predators. These numbers are striking. While Wyoming voters clearly stand against animal cruelty and the unethical practice of running down and killing wildlife, Wyoming laws lag. It’s time for the Legislature to take action.

The Wyoming Draws the Line campaign was started to address the wolf torture incident in Daniel. Our coalition’s members, like so many others in Wyoming, believe more must be done to stop animal cruelty by outlawing heinous acts like this and ensuring adequate penalties are imposed when necessary.  

We have a collective obligation to manage all wildlife in Wyoming for the benefit of all our people. This poll clearly shows that Wyoming citizens want unethical and torturous practices outlawed in our state, and WWC is working to that end.  

Fair Chase, as defined by the Boone and Crockett Club, is the ethical, sportsmanlike and lawful pursuit and taking of any free-ranging wild game animal in a manner that does not give the hunter an improper or unfair advantage over the game animals. As a hunter, this principle of fair chase is key to maintaining the integrity of the sport I so dearly love. Indeed, most hunters agree. 

A wolf in Yellowstone National Park’s Hayden Valley. (Ashton Hooker/National Park Service)

“The alleged events cannot and should not be considered hunting or wildlife management,” the Boone and Crockett Club said in a statement about the Daniel incident. “Respect for wildlife is at the heart of what we do as hunters and conservationists and it’s clear that respect was absent from this situation. The Club has long supported professional wildlife management by state fish and wildlife agencies — including the ethical, regulated hunting of game species — as the most effective way to ensure sustainable populations of wildlife. When we have these laws and regulations in place, it builds value for wildlife and those who violate the laws can be held accountable for their actions. Until wolves are managed within this system throughout their range, we will continue to have conflicts and loss of ethical behavior.”

This statement alludes to another concern I have as a Wyoming hunter: the potential loss of our state’s ability to manage our wildlife to the highest possible standards. The Daniel incident catalyzed many national groups to call for federal intervention. Wyoming must act soon to hold this off. We do not condone wildlife cruelty and torture, and we never thought we would need a law to spell it out. But past and recent events make it clear we need to explicitly draw the line. 

A wolf walks in Yellowstone National Park. (Jim Peaco/NPS)

And finally, I want to take a moment to address reports of death threats being leveled against our private citizens and government officials over the wolf torture case. There is an old saying: you cannot control the behavior of others, but you can always choose how you respond to it. Yet these threats, many of which may be coming from out of state, are despicable, and Wyoming’s response matters. We should calmly continue our work to outlaw wildlife cruelty and in doing so, show that decency and kindness are always values Wyomingites care about. WWC intends to do just that. 

I look forward to the work ahead as we travel across Wyoming growing our coalition, meeting with our neighbors and speaking out against wildlife cruelty. I hope you will join us in our work to remove this shadow over Wyoming’s reputation with pragmatic changes to our laws. 

Jim Laybourn is a Wyoming hunter living in Dubois, Wyoming. The Wyoming Wildlife Coalition can be found at www.wyomingwildlifecoalition.org

Join the Conversation

15 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I live near the Idaho Wyoming border, and when I read about this story, I was horrified and sickened by the torture this animal was forced to endure. I am not a hunter, but I understand and accept the rights of others to hunt. What I cannot accept is intentional torture of any living creature, especially when it is done for “fun”. This type of behavior cannot be accepted, it is not sport, it is just unnecessary animal cruelty. This is the kind of thing that can turn people against accepting hunting and hunters. This rule of chasing down innocent animals going about their lives with snowmobiles must be stopped, please.🙏

  2. This common-sense position is well stated and explained. The nail now has a flatter head.
    Animal cruelty is from the sick part of the human mind. The challenge is common to many western states (and beyond). Thank you, Mr. Laybourn.

  3. I was shocked when I read on the wyomingwildlifecoalition.org website that only 71% of the people said, that what Roberts did was animal cruelty. So 29% do not think it was animal cruelty. That is a lot. It shows the deep problem the state has.

  4. Thank you Jim. However I want to make sure you read both Gordon’s and Nesvicks comments about this situation. Gordon refuses to state a position ( true profile in courage) and Nesvick says there is no urgency to address this issue. I find both statements abhorrent but am not surprised. I know Nesvick is retiring but I do not trust Gordon to appoint a decent replacement.
    I agree that death threats and violence directed towards the individuals involved is not appropriate but you can imagine the frustration 71% of wyomingites feel when the sense is nothing will change.
    Please do all you can to address the disgusting nature of running down a live animal repeatedly with a snowmobile. Sharing a sidewalk with someone who takes joy in this scares me to death(yes those people would probably like to run me over too).
    A disgrace and I hope a loss of tourism dollars hurts those very same people. Sadly it will also hurt the people who love these animals too.

  5. Thank you Jim for so eloquently stating what needs to happen in WY. I to am a resident of Wyoming and feel it is past time for change. This is not and should not be a political issue. This is about morals and ethics and respect (regardless of how you view an animal) for another living, breathing, sentient being.

  6. Any kind of abuse of animals or human is an indication of a very disturbed mind. It should be taken very seriously by anyone having contact with abuser to take appropriate action

    1. Well said! I totally agree. This should include all wild animals, not just wolves.
      I see no difference between running wolves with a snowmobile than running wild horses to death with a helicopter.

      1. Perhaps you mean feral horses?
        Helicopters are legitimately used in managing animals, with a purpose, an objective. Leaving horses to overpopulate and over graze the range leads to the starvation of wildlife and the horses themselves. Harrying animals to no purpose is evil, I agree. Some uses of machines can be legitimate management.

  7. Great read. I live in NC and love Wyoming and it’s people. Animal cruelty in any form in inhumane and should be made illegal. It’s either sporting or it’s not. Running an animal down with any type of machine is not sport. Running game down on foot, now that would be something to see.

  8. I support the WWC. These reforms must take place – we can not be known across the national and throughout the world as a state that condones cruelty to animals. Our family didn’t respond to the poll but we would have been in the majority of the population – against cruelty – if we had.

  9. Jim: as a hunter as well as one who appreciates wildlife in their habitat , i support your efforts to insure this doesn’t happen again- it’s unethical. Subjecting the animal to display should result in loss of future hunting privileges .