Imperial Hotel Part 2 — The Ivory Question

Click here to read Imperial Hotel Part 1 — Reflections on Independence.

I land at New Delhi in July, 1997, spend a day dodging beggars and seeing sights, then fly to the 10,000-foot airstrip at Leh, Ladakh, west of Tibet, hugging the east flank of the Zanskar range, looking down on the Indus River. The motel is at 13,000 feet. The priority of this trip is to tour Buddhist monasteries and Buddhist farming communities at extreme altitudes.

In 1997, I was shooting film. I crisscrossed the cabin in the under-crowded Airbus 300, shooting the 22,000-plus-foot peaks and clouds as we crossed the India-Kashmir border. Oops, was this politically incorrect? I did not see any Indian or Chinese military facilities out the window, but, oh boy, I might have. First, the flight attendants went ballistic, then the pilot left the controls to come chew me out. OK, I got cussed out but they did not strip the film out of the camera.

These were pretty good pics of high peaks which I still have.

We land at the military/commercial airstrip at Leh, the highest in the world. (Until I got to Tibet, but that airstrip at 13,000 feet was strictly military.)

We get a taxi to the motel and unpack. My roommate has altitude sickness and my big bag full of medical supplies is still in New Delhi. Being unable to do more than empathize, I take my leave, deciding that strolling up and down the dirt streets would provide good altitudinal and cultural acclimation.

Ladakh, geographically, is a mountainous area bordering Tibet, historically inhabited by Buddhist subsistence farmers and dotted by Buddhist monasteries. It is crossed by the historic Silk Road. Barbaric invaders rumbled through here every few centuries, stealing treasures and looting monasteries. The Buddhist culture, here from long before Columbus started exploring, survives, partly ripped-off, but still vibrant.

Ladakh, politically, is a Buddhist enclave within a Muslim province (Jammu & Kashmir) of a Hindu country. India protects Ladakh by prohibiting transfer of ownership and restricting commerce to people who live in Jammu & Kashmir. Ladakhis are not very commerce-oriented, but their Muslim neighbors jump into the vacuum. Kashmiri street vendors and shopkeepers are ubiquitous.

As I was acclimating my American tourist butt to 13,000 feet, I wandered the (few) streets of Leh, photographing shops and trucks — but mainly the many colorful people. This activity placed me frequently in front of shops, all of which were owned by Muslim entrepreneurs. The shopkeepers wasted no time; when they saw this tourist with an expensive camera walking past the door, they would rush shouting into the street to try to cajole me into frequenting their shop. One of these characters, too good to pass up, talked me into his “front” shop and then dragged me into a dark, dusty, hidden, back room to show me a collection of carved ivory which would have been the featured centerpiece of any museum collection (at prices a fraction of their value). Intricate balls within balls, six- and eight-inch elephant tusks with elaborate carvings — pieces small and large. Most were yellowed with age; much too heavy to be plastic. I was holding forbidden treasures in my own little hands. OMG.

The dealer reassured me, with broken, earnest and enthusiastic English, that I would have no problems with customs. Yeah, right. Not his problem, just mine. Who would know whether he might drop the dime on me and collect a reward? I have never been so tempted and yet so confident that buying these pieces would be a huge mistake.

When I returned to New Delhi, I struck up a discussion with an art dealer who tended a lovely display case at the Imperial Hotel , filled with jewelry and heirlooms. To me, an apparently trustworthy person, he vouchsafed that he had trunks full of ivory in the hotel attic; the inventory was frozen in time by international bans on trading ivory. His ivory (according to him) had all been acquired legally. The trunks were locked and sealed by the government.

I bought no ivory. Instead I bought bronze statuary of the Buddha and jewelry.

Customs did not open my bags.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *