Justice Fox talks while her hand moves in front of her
Wyoming Supreme Court Chief Justice Kate Fox sits for an interview in May 2023 (Ana Castro/WyoFile) Credit: Ana Castro/WyoFile

Wyoming’s treatment courts could soon be in for big changes, including opening to more people. 

These courts are designed to help people with substance use disorders and other mental illnesses get treatment in lieu of jail or prison, theoretically delivering better outcomes for both the individual and taxpayers. 

In 2023, Gov. Mark Gordon signed Senate File 23-Treatment courts-transfer to judicial branch, allowing the judiciary to take over treatment courts in Wyoming. Such programs had previously operated under the wide-reaching Wyoming Department of Health.

As Rep. Art Washut (R-Casper) put it while chairing a House Judiciary Committee meeting, “The primary argument here is that without the treatment court judge, treatment courts pretty much don’t function.”

With the Wyoming Supreme Court now at the helm, there’s been a lot of work to bring stakeholders together and develop a plan to improve the treatment courts. And alongside that, the judiciary is asking for a few more statutory revisions to change the courts even more. 

The plan

Step one of stakeholders’ plans for treatment courts is to implement new standards. That is expected to happen July 1, according to State Court Administrator Elisa Butler, who spoke to the Legislature’s Joint Mental Health & Vulnerable Adult Task Force on Friday.

The Wyoming Supreme Court building in Cheyenne at sunset
The Wyoming Supreme Court in September 2023 in Cheyenne. (Joshua Wolfson/WyoFile)

“Those treatment court standards would be based on national, evidence-based models, and would increase accountability, improve data collection and ensure fidelity to that evidence-based model,” she said. 

While there were standards before, Health Department Director Stefan Johansson said Friday, this is a comprehensive update.

After those new standards go into effect, the plan is to certify treatment courts and initiate a peer review process in which employees at one drug court visit other drug courts. Those are expected to happen over the next few years.

Next on the list is better data via a state data and case management system. 

“Data is fundamental to ensuring effective treatment court options,” slides from the judiciary state. 

Beyond that, the judiciary aims to maintain sufficient staffing and funding to maintain the treatment courts as they change and grow alongside the state population. 

A new request

A bill draft to change treatment courts also cropped up Friday. Among other things, it would authorize counties, nonprofits and tribal governments to form regional courts.

“What we find in some of our communities is that they are too rural for each county to have its own treatment court,” Butler said. 

As written, the bill would also allow those convicted in criminal courts to participate in treatment courts — a resource that’s not currently available to them. It also would allow judges to require juvenile offenders to participate in treatment court, enable treatment courts to accept people who were convicted in other areas of the state, and allow public defenders to officially join the treatment court process.

“What we find in some of our communities is that they are too rural for each county to have its own treatment court.”

Elisa Butler, State Court Administrator

While there were a few lengthy discussions about how to best lay out how the regional treatment courts would work, there was no significant pushback, and updated bill language is expected to be presented at the committee’s next meeting on June 13 in Kemmerer.

Also coming up

Task force members also discussed a pilot program in Campbell County that’s meant to help people with severe mental illnesses get treatment instead of incarceration. 

That program would theoretically intervene earlier in the criminal justice pipeline and utilizes treatment court staff who are already in place. However, there will need to be specialized treatment for those who’re allowed into the program, which include non-violent offenders with misdemeanors who have PTSD, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia or are schizoaffective.

Lawmakers expect more information on how that still-new pilot project is going at the task force’s August meeting in Gillette.

Madelyn Beck reports from Laramie on health and public safety. Before working with WyoFile, she was a public radio journalist reporting for NPR stations across the Mountain West, covering regional issues...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I have been very pleased to see the advancements made by our Legislators, Judicial members, and Treatment Court professionals. I have been reviewing and discussing one issue with others regarding providing Treatment Court opportunities for Parolees. Most Treatment Court Directors have informed me they would like to accept parolees, but the parolees generally do not have time between their release from prison and their final discharge from Parole. Some advantages for Parolees to attend a Treatment Court is they have just completed inpatient treatment in prison and they have had an extended period of sobriety. If a parolee’s crimes were serious enough to put them in prison, certainly they should be a high priority for a Treatment Court. One step would be to have the offender complete a treatment court interview for acceptance during the PSI process. The judge could then recommend, in the Sentence, that the offender complete his prison sentence with sufficient months of Parole to a Treatment Court.