WyoFile Energy Report

When it was announced that the Keystone XL tar-sands pipeline would be delayed for further review, rumors began to swirl of a possible alternative route through Wyoming. But on Monday TransCanada officials indicated that an alternative route to avoid the Sandhills area of eastern Nebraska would likely require only 30 to 40 additional miles and remain within the Cornhusker State.

So what’s Wyoming’s stake in the Canada-to-Gulf oil pipeline? If built, it could ease access for Wyoming-produced oil because some Bakken oil from North Dakota and Montana now flows through Wyoming via the Belle Fourche and Bridger pipelines.

Brian Jeffries, executive director of the Wyoming Pipeline Authority, said those are the two main routes to market for crude produced in the eastern portion of the state. For now, it doesn’t appear that Bakken-produced oil is clogging the pipelines to the point of restricting market access. But Wyoming producers would likely welcome the Keystone XL — or any other major new Canada-to-Gulf connection — because it would ease overall pipeline capacity for all producers.

“It might leave more room for us,” Jeffries told WyoFile. “We want their (Montana and North Dakota’s) barrels off our highway.”

Click here for an interactive map of Wyoming pipelines.

Oil pipeline capacity is a challenge that Wyoming officials wish to have as they look across the Colorado border with a bit of rig-envy at momentum building in Colorado’s Niobrara shale oil play. As reported in the Colorado Independent, Houston-based Anadarko Petroluem now says it may be sitting on nearly 1 billion barrels of shale oil along the Colorado Front Range.

But for now, the pace of Niobrara shale oil production in Wyoming is considerably slower. A look at the Baker Hughes rig count iPhone app this morning indicates that rigs are clustered in Colorado’s Weld County, compared to one rig drilling for oil in southeast Wyoming. However, in the southern Powder River Basin there are about 13 rigs drilling for oil and four drilling for natural gas.

In fact, a look at horizontal well permits issued by the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission year-to-date indicates that producers are focusing more on the Niobrara, Turner, Sussex, Frontier and Parkman formations in the southern Powder River Basin than the Niobrara in the southeast corner of the state. The OGCC issued a total 457 horizontal well permits in Johnson, Campbell and Converse counties. That compares to a total 247 horizontal well permits in Goshen, Laramie and Platte counties.

If successful, those new wells in the Powder River Basin will have relative access to an old network of oil gathering lines and to the Belle Fourche and Bridger pipelines, which converge near Guernsey and take crude east.

— Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile editor-in-chief, has covered Wyoming’s energy industry for 13 years. He can be reached at 307-577-6069 or dustin@wyofile.com.

REPUBLISH THIS COLUMN: For details on how you can republish this column or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *