Rep. Ember Oakley (R-Riverton) during a House Judiciary Committee meeting March 11, 2021. (Michael Cummo/Wyoming Tribune Eagle/Wyoming News Exchange)

UPDATE: The bill passed the House 46-13 with one excused on Tuesday. It’s been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The Wyoming Legislature is considering a bill that would make certain kinds of drug use while pregnant a felony. House Bill 85 – Child endangering-controlled substance use while pregnant classifies methamphetamine or narcotic drug use by a pregnant person as child endangerment. 

It’s meant to ensure both the safety of the parent and the fetus, according to bill sponsor Rep. Ember Oakley (R-Riverton). Detractors, however, argue that such a punitive approach will cause more harm than good. 

Punishment or treatment?

Oakley said the bill is designed to address “a hole in the law,” during a House Judiciary Committee meeting last week. Oakley, who works as a prosecutor in the Fremont County Attorney’s office, referenced a 2005 case from her jurisdiction in which a district court judge ruled that state child endangerment laws do not apply to a fetus. On those terms, the judge dismissed a case against a woman whose newborn child had tested positive for methamphetamine. 

“In no way is this a stretch or a big change in the law,” said Oakley during the committee meeting. “It’s illegal to possess methamphetamine. It’s illegal to use methamphetamine. It’s illegal to have children in the same room or vehicle or anywhere near methamphetamine. And so … this fits squarely in with behavior that is already prohibited and illegal.” 

Rep. Karlee Provenza (D-Laramie) is concerned additional criminal penalties would discourage pregnant women from seeking prenatal care. Provenza also pointed to evidence that state policies with punitive action against pregnant drug users are associated with higher rates of infants born in withdrawal. 

If they want to solve this problem, Provenza said, lawmakers should treat it as a public health issue and provide support, instead of incarceration. 

Oakley pushed back on that. 

“That is exactly what this is a measure to do. That is very, very often — more often than not — what the criminal justice system is used to do,” Oakley said. “Like it or not, that’s what happens.”

The bill is not strictly punitive, according to Oakley. A substance abuse evaluation following conviction, for example, could provide an opportunity for addicted mothers to access support and rehabilitative services, Oakley said. She considers parole to be among the treatment and recovery options available to convicted felons. 

Rep. Karlee Provenza (D-Laramie) during the 2022 Legislative Session. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Testimony 

“I’m actually the woman in the case Ms. Oakley referred to earlier,” said Michele Foust, who spoke in opposition to the bill during public testimony. 

Foust described not seeking prenatal care while pregnant and using drugs “100% out of a fear” of prosecution. At that time, a child endangerment law had just taken effect in Wyoming that prohibited a person from knowingly or willingly causing a child to absorb, inhale or otherwise ingest any meth and it was not yet clear if that would apply to a fetus. 

“I believe that unification and keeping families together and strong and pulling people closer is going to be key to success rather than isolating and sending people to prison,” Foust said. 

Rep. Mike Yin (D-Jackson) asked Foust whether she thought felony prosecution increases the likelihood that a pregnant person would get an abortion if they were using drugs. Foust responded, “absolutely.”

Several mental health professionals also spoke in opposition to the bill, highlighting the fact that the bill does not guarantee treatment following a conviction. 

“We would like to see treatment prioritized,” Lindsay Simineo with Wyoming Counseling Association said. “I believe that is the reason you’re seeing such heartburn about this bill is, for us as providers, the language isn’t there.”

Others are concerned by the current lack of substance abuse treatment resources. Community mental health centers provide the only residential substance abuse treatment in the state, according to Andi Summerville with the Wyoming Association of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers. Summerville told the committee the state has 21 parenting women beds — four in Casper, nine in Rock Springs and eight in Sheridan. Those beds are currently full, along with an additional 16 women on an approximately six-month-long waiting list. 

“We’ll probably need a lot more resources to potentially meet the need, and that’s not a bad thing. We want to meet the needs of these women. We want them to come to treatment,” Summerville said. She also highlighted a proposal to add 12 beds in Sheridan that is currently in the works. 

A mother-child unit at the Wyoming Women’s Center in Lusk has remained vacant since it was established in 2014 because of staffing issues. 

Legal status of a fetus 

Steven Melia, a Cheyenne resident, spoke in favor of the bill during public testimony, arguing that a fetus should be recognized by the law. 

Rep. Mark Jennings (R-Sheridan) shared that sentiment when he spoke in favor of the bill on the House floor. 

“I don’t think that we want to lose total sight here … There’s another life that’s involved here,” Jennings said. “That child in the womb, that baby deserves some protection.” 

Family Policy Alliance of Wyoming also sees HB 85 as pro-life legislation.  “This bill would de facto recognize the legal status of the ‘child’ in the womb as a living person entitled to protection under the law,” wrote the alliance in an email blast to its members last week. The group is a “Christ-centered organization,” according to its website, and a partner of Focus on the Family — a fundamentalist Christian organization based in Colorado Springs with national lobbying ties. 

Pro-life arguments have been present, but have not dominated debate on the bill. 

“My motivation for bringing this bill is what I have said when I introduced it on the floor, when I presented it in committee and in debates on the Floor,” Oakley said in an email to WyoFile when asked if establishing legal personhood for fetuses motivated the bill.   

A mirrored version of the bill in the Senate failed in committee. It included mandatory reporting that would have required any person, including medical professionals, to report a pregnant drug user to local law enforcement or child protection services.   

The bill, however, is still in play in the House. It passed second reading Monday morning. The House also adopted an amendment by Oakley to require the court to order probation for those violating this particular offense for the first time. Oakey said she brought the amendment to address concerns that the bill’s only focus is incarceration. 

Maggie Mullen

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published.

  1. These babies(fetus) I have no choice but to take these drugs that their mothers are pumping into them. If a woman gives a 3-year-old meth she would go to jail why don’t they put him in jail for forcing a fetus to take drugs. These women have choices the babies don’t we need to stop this now

  2. It’s probably best that people stay out of Fremont County, or risk getting fined and incarcerated. “Come to Riverton and leave a Felon” might be a snappy billboard. Some people just love sticking it to others. Sad

  3. Oakley campaigned on a promise to get Wyoming financially back on track but what we got was, someone giddy to be in the annual Cheyenne ‘in crowd’ and apparently there isn’t a bill that incriminates, fines and-or jails citizens that she doesn’t like. We need people in the legislature that work for the citizens, not against. Bethany Baldes, if you’re reading this, PLEASE RUN FOR THIS SEAT!!!!

  4. Well, just noticed, Ember Oakley, Dist 55, does not make a move unless Ogden Driskill, Dist 1 is on the Bill. Not just the HB 85 in question, but almost all, if not every Bill introduced in Cheyenne. Geez, so we elected a Representative to work for the common interest of Dist 55, yet it looks like Ogden, Dist 55 is our De Facto Rep.?!?! Guess next time there’s a problem in Riverton, we need to call Mr. Driskell all the way over at Devil’s Tower. Flashback to the year 2020 – can I rescind my vote? My apologies to the Libertarian candidate, Ms. Bethany Baldes

    1. It’s good to know that she embarrasses fremont county as a prosecutor and as a representative. At least she is consistent.

  5. Obviously, heroin, cocaine, alcohol, and tobacco need to be added. Skiing, cycling and rodeoing should be banned as well. As long as we are violating a woman’s1st, 4th, 5th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 13th, and 14th amendment rights, what’s a few more? Which state will be the 1st to legalize witch burning? This is a start.

  6. Huh? One supposed incident (if it indeed really happened) that occurred in 2005 warrants a Bill in 2022? Not our best and brightest strive to be the bottom of the food chain of the legal profession, which is the position of county prosecutor. Now this same individual, by 0.6% majority of the 2020 vote against a Libertarian outsider, is in the big leagues of the Wyoming legislature. That’s our (votes in house district 55) mistake. Sorry, rest of Wyoming. Along with last weeks ‘wonderful’ publicity of co-sponsoring that horrid -and now dead- trespass bill, it looks like this Rep is going to be the subject of bad news again this week. Wonder what’s is coming next week?

  7. While I don’t condone any illegal drug use whatsoever, HB 85 smacks of discrimination. Men who father a child and are using drugs while sexually active should also be prosecuted . Why is the blame always targeted towards women? Men should share this responsibility also.
    More importantly, drug users of both genders need help, not prosecutorial measures. Sounds like Ms Oakley needs to be voted out- along with the get-little-done-geezers who have over served their time. Wyoming people need help, not prosecution.
    Make better choices at the ballot box.

  8. I am always amazed when I see that a woman, Ember Oakley in this case, is a misogynist. Is it only punishment freaks who want to become prosecutors? Or do prosecutors become punishments freaks only after gaining office? Asking for a friend.

  9. Wow. Oakley, just barely a year into her position, has shown that she likes to “stick it” to the people. Oakley was a co-sponsor of the HB103 trespass bill, which would of imprisoned and financially penalized citizens, many of whom who were trying to access public land – there land. I guess this is par for the course in regards to someone who is a small time county prosecutor.

    This is the same Ember Oakley who didn’t have the support of the GOP Party and barely, just barely eked by a Libertarian candidate by 6/10’ths of One Percent.

    She better not think that for one minute the us, the “people” aren’t paying attention. Political posturing? YOU KNOW IT!!!!

  10. “Oakley, who works as a prosecutor in the Fremont County Attorney’s office, referenced a 2005 case from her jurisdiction in which a district court judge ruled that state child endangerment laws do not apply to a fetus.”

    A single case from 2005? This alone would suggest that this is not really a problem, especially not one that needs to addressed during a budget session. Shameless political posturing by Ember Oakley