Makin’ Bacon

In the midst of historic mineral revenues and state reserve accounts, Governor Mead is celebrating a huge infusion of federal dollars for the Greater Sage-grouse and is asking for federal money for flood disasters.  Maybe he envies the larded up massive highway spending in our neighboring Montana, with two Democratic senators and one Democratic governor.

I guess Matt didn’t sign Michele Bachmann’s pledges to not increase taxes or the debt ceiling. Maybe Michele’s husband, an alleged therapist, could pray for our Governor to be freed from the sinful urge to spend federal dollars.

Where will these federal dollars come from? Sorry, dangled a preposition. From where, Governor, will the federal government find the dollars to make you happy having the opportunity to dole out those dollars (my dollars) to grateful constituents?

Well, in fact they will come from China and Saudi Arabia. We print the dollars, buy overseas products with them, and the vendors lend them back to us. The busy swarm of international-banking electrons is invisible, and therefore apparently unobjectionable.

Cynthia Lummis, like every Congressman except maybe Ron Paul, brags when she brings home the federal bacon. The easiest path to re-election is to buy it with public money, while simultaneously disclaiming the power of the federal purse to borrow and spend that money.

The point of these jibes is not borne of contempt of our monolithic Republican elected power structure in Wyoming; the point is consistency. If you oppose deficits and oppose tax reform or tax increases or revenue enhancements, don’t keep spending my money. Otherwise face the music.

I think Wyoming state government can fund better telecommunications on the Wind River Indian Reservation.  And fix flood and landslide damage. And pave roads. And figure out incentives to stop ranchers from destroying Sage-grouse habitat without running up the federal deficit. Those ranchers lining up for federal subsidies call our President names at the feed store and blame him for spending too much, while waiting for the bank to open to cash that government check.

We let the federal government pay for the things that we don’t want to pay for: farm subsidies, education mandates, mostly all EPA programs, birth control. We want successful farms, a clean environment, good schools, but we don’t want to pay for them. Maybe we need to make some choices.

Here’s an example: Fencing livestock out of riparian areas is a tremendously productive way to restore wildlife habitat, but it’s not cheap. I paid for it at our little experimental 2,500 acre ranch in Montana; most places no one will do it unless NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service) will pay for it. Why can’t the state of Wyoming fund more habitat improvements?

Let’s cut some of those federal umbilical cords and be, like the Old West, self-reliant.

REPUBLISH THIS COLUMN: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *