After delivering his State of the State address at the Legislature's temporary chambers at the Jonah Business Center, Gov. Matt Mead, left, spoke at a Medicaid expansion rally on Monday at the Highlands Presbyterian Church in Cheyenne. It was organized by the Wyoming Association of Churches. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Gov. Matt Mead (R) used his sixth State of the State address Monday to challenge the Wyoming Legislature to expand Medicaid, resist deep cuts to social programs and to continue what he calls fiscally conservative investments in highways, cities and counties despite a projected budget shortfall.

His own budget proposal, submitted in December, would require no further cuts, he said. Instead, it relies on expanding Medicaid to bring in federal dollars and help offset growing healthcare costs. It also called for dipping into the state’s $1.8 billion rainy day fund to maintain capital construction and other projects.

“We continue to build the largest rainy day fund in the country while continuing to pretend it’s not raining,” he told lawmakers.

Gov. Mead’s challenges to the Legislature come after the Joint Appropriations Committee in January declined to embrace several key components of his budget proposal, and Medicaid expansion in particular. While the legislative panel is contemplating some spending from the rainy day fund — approximately $200 million — its own preliminary budget work includes broad cuts to state programs, including spending for K-12 schools.

The JACs approach places an unnecessary burden on residents, cities and counties, Mead said, and it threatens to hobble ongoing investments that tend to pay off in the long term. If the Legislature again declines to expand Medicaid it forces an additional $33 million in cuts elsewhere compared to his own budget proposal.

“I wonder,” said Mead. “Are we willing to cut more than $33 million from literacy, tourism, local government, senior centers, and early childhood development, just so we don’t have to expand Medicaid?”

State Treasurer Mark Gordon shakes hands in the "fishbowl" gallery of the House Chamber as guests are welcomed into the chamber during Gov. Matt Mead's 2016 State of the State address. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)
State Treasurer Mark Gordon shakes hands in the “fishbowl” gallery of the House Chamber as guests are welcomed into the chamber during Gov. Matt Mead’s 2016 State of the State address. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Some estimates place Wyoming’s budget shortfall through 2018 at $600 million, due to declining oil and natural gas prices, as well as decreases in the state’s coal output. Wyoming’s revenue and budget spending had essentially plateaued in recent years. But the continuing losses in the state’s mineral extraction-dependent economy requires spending cuts, according to legislative leaders.

House Speaker Kermit Brown, Majority Floor Leader Rosie Berger, House Speaker Pro Tempore Tim Stubson and House Majority Whip Hans Hunt issued a joint statement following the State of the State:

“While our budget shortfall is serious, it is not an insurmountable obstacle,” they said. “We will tackle this challenge just as we always have — with thoughtfulness, a willingness to compromise and an eye on the future.

“We appreciate Governor Mead’s remarks this morning. We look forward to working with him in the coming days.”

Gov. Mead switched his stance against Medicaid expansion in the fall of 2014, after what he describes as “fighting the good fight” against the Affordable Care Act. The Legislature, for the second time, declined Medicaid expansion in 2015. Wyoming has essentially turned away some $220 million in federal funds by refusing to expand Medicaid under the ACA — Wyoming taxpayer dollars that are instead going to other states to offset ever-increasing costs of healthcare, he said

He acknowledged entrenched philosophical opposition among lawmakers — and himself — to the ACA. But said the new national healthcare policy is so far along that it is impossible to turn back, even if a GOP candidate does take the White House in 2017.

“You don’t like my plan, what is the Legislature’s solution to this issue?” Mead said in his address.

Rallying to expand Medicaid

Monday afternoon, Gov. Mead spoke to a rally of Medicaid expansion supporters at the Highlands Presbyterian Church. The rally attracted a broad selection of odd bedfellows, from those in the faith community to progressive organizations, a large contingency from the Wind River Native Advocacy Center and members of Wyoming’s business community. The rally was organized by the Wyoming Association of Churches.

He told rally attendees that when it comes to expanding Medicaid, he must follow the advice he received when he first became governor: “When you become governor, you’ve got to be governor for all of the people of the state.”

“What we’re doing to not expand Medicaid is taking $33 million out of the general fund. So it’s a compounding problem.”

He said the 20,000 people in Wyoming who would directly benefit from expansion “are not somebodies, they’re us. … If that doesn’t reach us in our hearts, it should reach us in our heads. We’re already paying for it.”

Former legislator, author and Pastor of Highlands United Presbyterian Church Roger McDaniel told rally goers that expanding Medicaid “is not just a political issue, it is a spiritual issue.” As a matter of scripture, he said “When there is no vision, the people perish. The budget this governor put together is visionary.”

If one reads what the Joint Appropriation Committee’s did to the governor’s budget, “it will make you weep,” McDaniel said.

In the video clip below, Gov. Matt Mead speaks at a Medicaid expansion rally, and challenges the opposition’s argument that it’s risky for the state of Wyoming to accept federal dollars:

 

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Lots of people commenting not just in Wyoming but nationwide about “free money”. Free money does not exist. In a Republic such as ours, people are taxed to contribute to the common good. And the common good includes some help for those on the lowest rungs of the income ladder. I am very hopeful that the JAC will reverse itself on the medicaid issue. Governor Mead is right on this one. The JAC must be careful that it does not let ideology override the reality that some people are suffering in our economy. Thank you for the good recommendations, Governor Mead.

  2. There were some striking remarks in this article. Governor Mead was told in 2014 he is the governor of all the people in Wyoming, so today he realizes that fact after fighting the good fight. I don’t really believe that stance, for he listen to his legislative body and key leadership within these houses. Medicaid is a program which requires, federal mandates placed upon the State Government, like the Older Americans Act, or the Senior Services Programs. Therefore; how does the Legislative branches oppose this plan, because if the Federal government doesn’t put up, then Two Hundred Million Wyoming is holding the bag, the way I see the discussions. In other words this State has had at least Four years to come up with a plan, a sound response to the Wyoming people. We all know such is not the case, why is that from the Fiscal appropriations committee or the Governor’s Staff and Legislative branches, for the represent all the people. I think Wyoming needs to look within not out on blaming the usage of the program, for people back the present medicaid expansion for no alternative system is offered, yet 20,000 Wyoming people have no insurance, mandated by government. Personally take the money while we can, and build a plan to pay for the program the best way possible if the programs fails. I’m quite sure Wyoming will not be alone if Federal dollars shrink.

    Ken Casner

  3. Mead is right to say that Obama Care is so far entrenched in Law now there’s no turning back. No Republican President could overturn it no matter what they do. Wyoming is definitely taking a major turn because of the slow down with coal and natural gas. Wyoming will have to move forward and join a global economy. No more wild west, peek your head out its beautiful out here.

    Larry Antelope

  4. Gov. Mead is subject to the two term limit instigated in 1992. If Wyoming Expands Medicaid in 2016 he gets three years of free money and 20,000 people covered. What politician does not like to give people free stuff. He will be back in his ranch when when the federal government fails to cover 90% of a then entitlement. The legislature, which is not subject to the 1992 term limits, will be left trying to fix Gov. Mead’s mess. I hope our solon’s consider the long term interest of Wyoming and reject Medicaid expansion.

  5. Finally, a lucid approach to this problem and a quality-of-life improvement for citizens of Wyoming. Godspeed, Governor Mead…..