Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead believes immigration laws require Congressional action, and that now is the time for it, he said Thursday.

“In terms of the impact of President Trump’s action to people in Wyoming and all other states, in the long term, we must look to Congress,” Mead wrote. WyoFile had asked the governor to comment on President Trump’s decision to phase out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and how it might affect the estimated more than 600 beneficiaries of the program living in Wyoming.

Mead called for Congress to act with compassion, quoting a message from Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.

“At the heart of this issue are young people who came to this country through no fault of their own,” Ryan said. “For many of them it’s the only country they know … It is my hope that the House and Senate, with the president’s leadership, will be able to find consensus on a permanent legislative solution that includes ensuring that those who have done nothing wrong can still contribute as a valued part of this great country.”

Mead also sought to reassure DACA recipients in Wyoming and elsewhere by pointing to a Thursday tweet from Trump. The president promised there would be no deportation action taken on DACA recipients during the six month period he has set for winding down the program.

“In my view, this period of no action gives Congress time to act,” Mead wrote.

In comments to the Wyoming Tribune Eagle, Wyoming’s congressional delegation voiced support for Trump’s decision to rescind DACA. Sens. Mike Enzi and John Barrasso also offered tempered compassion for those engaged with the program.

Wyoming’s American Civil Liberties Union representative, Sabrina King, scoffed at Mead’s assurances.

“To suggest DACA recipients will not feel any impact during that time is to grossly underestimate how deeply the uncertainty of DACA will be felt by Dreamers in Wyoming,” she wrote in a statement to WyoFile.

“Our political leadership needs to step up to the plate, and not just in Congress, though Senators Barrasso and Enzi and Representative Cheney should absolutely support the Dream Act,” she said. “Our governor, legislative leadership, mayors, school boards — anyone with a voice in a position of power should be speaking out and letting Wyoming Dreamers know they are supported and that we will fight as a state to protect DACA.”

Mead, a former federal prosecutor heading a conservative state, has disappointed Wyoming immigration activists with his deference to federal immigration law before. In July, he told reporters he did not believe in the idea of sanctuary cities because he believed cooperation between local and federal law enforcement was key to public safety. Sanctuary cities are municipalities where local law enforcement is prohibited from cooperating with federal authorities on immigration law or at times from even inquiring about someone’s immigration status.

On May 1, more than 100 people joined a march to Mead’s office organized by Cheyenne immigration group Juntos, according to a report from the Wyoming Tribune Eagle. There, the protesters delivered a letter asking Mead to support Wyoming’s undocumented residents.

The response came more than a month later with a terse letter signed not by Mead but by his Chief of Staff, Kari Jo Gray. “The Governor appreciates what immigrants have meant and will continue to mean to our country,” she wrote. “As a former U.S. Attorney, the Governor also understands that immigration law is federal, not state, and that federal law governs those who enter this country.”

Did you learn from this story? Support WyoFile at Old Bill’s Fun Run and have your donation partially matched

Andrew Graham covers criminal justice for WyoFile.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *