The U.S. Senate confirmed U.S. Attorney for Wyoming Darin Smith on a narrow party-line vote Monday, just days after judges tossed nine federal indictments citing Smith’s misconduct that could have prejudiced jurors. 

Smith, who was initially appointed on an interim basis in August, was confirmed in an “en bloc” vote along with 48 other Trump nominees, meaning senators didn’t debate his merits. He will serve a four-year term at the helm of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Wyoming. 

The embattled attorney’s confirmation comes less than a week after three federal judges dismissed nine felony indictments due to Smith’s interactions with grand jurors. The judges ruled in favor of defense attorneys who accused Smith of polluting the grand jury by calling the defendants “murderers” and saying that the deliberations “won’t take long,” among other things. One of the defendants has been charged with a murder on the Wind River Reservation

“The cumulative effect of the many known instances of misconduct leaves the court with ‘grave doubt that the [grand jury’s] decision to indict was free from the substantial influence of such violations,’” the judges wrote.

Under the Wyoming Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys, the U.S. Attorney’s Office reviewed the March grand jury proceedings. That review resulted in further disclosures about Smith’s conduct, including that he had passed out business cards to grand jury members and had asked for the list of grand jurors. That behavior, the three judges concluded, was concluding in two ways. It appeared like Smith was trying to “curry favor with the grand jurors.” And prosecutors should not be soliciting communication with grand jurors outside of court.

Smith’s office declined to comment on the dismissed indictments or his intended approach going forward. “Because the allegations made against Darin relate to ongoing litigation regarding grand jury, we do not wish to respond,” Smith’s spokesperson said in an email. His office also didn’t comment on Smith’s confirmation. 

Smith has also faced stiff criticism over his credentials and conduct. Responding to questions from U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee lawmakers, Smith admitted that he had no experience appearing in court for a criminal or civil case, questioning witnesses before a grand jury or applying for a warrant. Some have also accused Smith of being a Jan. 6 insurrectionist. Smith told senators that he was on Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, but didn’t enter the building. 

Tribal response

The Northern Arapaho and the Eastern Shoshone tribes have been particularly outspoken in condemning the Wyoming U.S. attorney. Smith’s confirmation holds particular weight on the Wind River Reservation — federal prosecutors handle felony cases for crimes committed on the reservation by tribal members, and sometimes by non-tribal members. 

“It is through the U.S. Attorney’s Office that our Native families and communities find justice, are ensured a fair and unbiased proceeding, and are made safe,” a statement that the Eastern Shoshone Business Council published Monday morning on Facebook states. 

Yet Smith, the message continues, “shows a flippant disregard for the integrity of the justice system through reckless comments, improper familiarity with grand jurors, and conduct that creates the appearance of bias and prejudice.” 

An opinion piece by the Northern Arapaho Business Council, published Saturday in the Riverton Ranger and the Lander Journal, noted that the U.S. Attorney’s Office “already faces longstanding criticism regarding the failure to adequately prosecute crimes arising on Indian reservations,” with many cases stalling before they get to a grand jury. 

“For Native victims and families, this means violent crimes often go unanswered, justice is delayed or denied, and faith in the federal system continues to erode,” the piece stated. 

Meanwhile, Wyoming’s all-Republican congressional delegation has cheered Smith’s nomination. In a joint statement last year, Sen. John Barrasso described Smith as “well-qualified” and “a solid, conservative choice.” Sen. Cynthia Lummis said he “possesses the qualifications, experience, and values needed to take on this challenging role.” And Rep. Harriet Hageman trusted that Smith “will uphold the rule of law.” 

Barrasso and Lummis both voted in favor of Smith’s confirmation on Monday. Wyoming’s congressional delegation didn’t respond to questions about Smith’s confirmation or the dismissed indictments by publishing time.

Maya Shimizu Harris covers public safety for WyoFile. She was previously a freelance writer and the state politics reporter for the Casper Star-Tribune.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *