A male sage grouse struts on a Wyoming lek in April 2020. (Bill Sincavage)

Montana biologists believe good weather and possibly the cyclical fluctuation of populations may be responsible for a 73% increase in the state’s 2020 estimate of greater sage grouse numbers compared to 2019.

In an Aug. 18 report to the Legislature, Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks put the 2020 population estimate at 77,977 birds. The agency estimated there were 44,867 greater sage grouse in the state in 2019, the report states.

The increase of 33,110 birds marks a jump of 73% between the two years. Biologists and others surveyed 805 breeding-ground leks during the spring mating season, counted the number of strutting males, and plugged those numbers into a mathematical formula to arrive at the estimate.

Montana holds about 11.6% of the world’s greater sage grouse. Other western states with significant greater sage grouse populations reported much smaller increases this year, if any at all.

Wyoming, which holds an estimated 38% of all greater sage grouse, averages the number of strutting males seen on leks statewide, then graphs that figure to see whether numbers have increased or decreased. In 2020, the state saw a slight decline in the average number of males seen strutting on active leks and reported a “leveling out” of a three-year slide. Lek attendance “held steady,” the agency said.

Montana’s population explosion may be due to favorable weather in 2019, the report states.

“The lack of widespread drought or extreme weather events (e.g., hail, flooding) during this period may have positively influenced late summer food resources and led to higher survival and recruitment,” the report reads. “Data from FWP’s sage-grouse research project in central Montana suggests nest success and hen survival were comparatively high in spring and summer 2019.”

If the central Montana data reflected conditions in the rest of the state, “they could explain the increase in the number of sage-grouse attending leks in spring 2020,” the report reads.

The annual compendium suggests “natural fluctuations” may also have some influence on the increase. “Sage-grouse population numbers oscillate over a period of 8-10 years across large scales,” the report reads. “It is important to consider long-term patterns over time and not make management decisions based on one or a few years of lek counts, especially at broad scales.”

Although biologists debate the concept of grouse population cycles, one peer-reviewed study found that 11 of 15 greater sage grouse populations “were cyclic at some point in a 50-year time series (1965–2015).”  The cycle patterns “varied over both time and space,” authors wrote.

Support independent reporting — donate to WyoFile today

The 2020 estimate of the total population “look[s] to be just above the long-term average,” Catherine Wightman, wildlife habitat coordinator with Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, told WyoFile just before the report was published.

The Legislature also charged her agency with reporting information about leks themselves. The number of confirmed active leks dropped from 1,019 in 2019 to 998 in 2020. The number of leks confirmed extirpated held steady at 66, the report says.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *