Nearly 4 million seriously mentally ill still without insurance

By Michael Olive,
— April 29, 2014
(Originally published at STATELINE.ORG
Community–based mental health facilities, like the Riverwood Centers in Minnesota that helped Bruce Echelberry, above, through depression, are facing public funding cuts and closures. Some low-income patients still needing mental health care will be covered by states, including Minnesota, that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. (AP)
Community–based mental health facilities, like the Riverwood Centers in Minnesota that helped Bruce Echelberry, above, through depression, are facing public funding cuts and closures. Some low-income patients still needing mental health care will be covered by states, including Minnesota, that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. (AP)

Some might consider Kelly Troyer of South Carolina lucky. She isn’t one of them.

Thanks to the generosity of her church and family members, she receives some treatment for the depression and post-traumatic stress disorder she suffers as a result of the sexual assault she endured in 2012. But Troyer, 45, said her lack of health insurance and other uncovered medical costs, including a hospitalization and all her medications, has forced her into personal bankruptcy.

She lives in one of the 24 states that chose not to expand their Medicaid programs, offered under the Affordable Care Act. Those decisions have left about 3.7 million Americans with serious mental illness, psychological distress or a substance abuse disorder without health insurance, according to a recent report from the American Mental Health Counselors Association (AMHCA), a group that represents mental health professionals.

In states that agreed to expand Medicaid, about 3 million people who have those conditions and were uninsured are now eligible for coverage, according to the report.

“It makes no sense that this state would not accept the Affordable Care Act,” Troyer said. “Don’t say no and then don’t offer another option. There are people who are homeless now because they don’t have health insurance. I could be one of them.”

04_08_top_story_Uninsured-and-Mentally-IllOption Offered

Medicaid, the federal-state health care program for the poor, is the primary means by which states pay for mental health care for the poor. Medicaid beneficiaries are entitled to comprehensive care for mental illness and substance abuse.

Originally, the federal health care law enacted in 2010 required  all states to expand Medicaid benefits to  adults with annual incomes below 138 percent of poverty or $15,521 for an individual in 2014.

A 2012 U.S. Supreme Court decision gave states the option of not participating in the eligibility expansion. Most, but not all, states with Republican governors or Republican-controlled legislatures opted out, even though the federal government is paying 100 percent of the costs of the expansion in the first three years before tapering down to 90 percent after 2019.

The federal health law could have added as many as 18.7 million more Americans to the Medicaid rolls. With only 26 states now participating, that number is down to about 8.1 million. If the 24 states that opted out of the Medicaid expansion continue to do so, they will forgo a total of $61.9 billion in federal revenues by 2022, according to a December Commonwealth Fund report. Governors in those states say they don’t trust the federal government to come up with the promised money and worry the states will be left having to make up the difference.

“It is really a tragedy,” said Joel Miller, executive director of AMHCA. “When uninsured people with mental health conditions, such as depression, gain Medicaid coverage, they become healthier and life expectancy increases, but in states that refuse to expand Medicaid, citizens will see their hopes dashed for a better life and better health.”

The report gives state-by-state numbers of people with serious mental illness or substance abuse disorders who would have received Medicaid if their states had opted in to  Medicaid expansion. The report covers 25 states, although since it was published, one of them, New Hampshire, decided to reverse course and join the expansion states.

Funding Cuts

Separate from Medicaid, many states have also funded community mental health programs, but they have also sharply reduced spending on those programs in recent years. The National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors estimated that in the four years ending in 2012, states reduced mental health spending by a total of $4.35 billion.

Because of those reductions, mental health advocates have pressed hard for states to expand Medicaid eligibility. “Medicaid expansion is the single most important thing our leadership could do for people with mental illness,” said Greg Hansch, policy coordinator of the National Alliance on Mental Illness in Texas, which decided not to expand and  left 652,000 low-income severely mentally ill Texans without coverage, according to the AMHCA report.

The situation is similar in Kansas, which AMHCA said has 52,000 uninsured people with severe mental illness. According to state Rep. James Ward, a Democrat, the state has cut its spending for community mental health by more than 50 percent since 2007.

Medicaid expansion would have helped address the state’s mental health needs, he said. Instead, he expects the situation will go from bad to catastrophic with “more people falling through the cracks, more of the mentally ill jailed, more homeless, all of the effects you have when there isn’t mental health treatment.” As it is, Ward said, the largest mental health ward in his home county of Sedgwick is the jail.

Ward expressed frustration that despite episodes such as the recent fatal shooting at Fort Hood in Texas that focused attention on deficiencies in mental health treatment, Republicans in his state have blocked Medicaid expansion. Nearly eight in 10 of all uninsured people with either a mental health condition or substance abuse disorder live in one of the 11 Southern states that didn’t expand Medicaid, the AMHCA report said. (The report includes Texas and Oklahoma in those states.)

The reason for that concentration, said Miller, the association’s director, is that these states generally had the most restrictive Medicaid eligibility requirements before the federal health law was enacted.

Indiana Ranks Highest

Of the  states that didn’t expand, Indiana had the highest percentage of adults with mental health conditions among those who would have been Medicaid-eligible – 62 percent. Georgia had the lowest at 27 percent, the report found.

The primary source of information for the AMHCA report was the National Survey on Drug Use and Health cosponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

The survey counted people in three categories of mental illness: those with serious mental illness, meaning that they had a diagnosable mental, behavioral or emotional disorder that had resulted in serious functional impairment; serious psychological distress with frequent intense feelings of nervousness, hopelessness, restlessness, worthlessness or sadness; and substance abuse disorder, meaning abuse or dependence on illicit drugs or alcohol.

Those criteria were derived from  “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,” published by theAmerican Psychiatric Associationwhich is used by most mental health care providers, health insurers and pharmaceutical companies.

Whether Kelly Troyer, who worked in nonprofits until the assault, is one of the 192,000 South Carolinians without coverage that the AMHCA report cited, she doesn’t know. What she does know is that she hasn’t been able to work. “There’s a stigma that it’s people’s fault that they’re not working,” she said. “It’s frowned upon that you need help instead of looking at it like this is the right thing to do to give everyone access to care.”

She half seriously noted that if it weren’t for the help she gets from her church and family, she might have been better off in prison. “Prisoners in the Greenville County Detention Center have better mental health care than I can get out here.”

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.
REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story from free, click here.

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. HR 3717 Ensures mentally ill are not denied accessed to best medications and treatment.
    Current Meidicaid and Medicare policies restrict doctors to prescribing only “one drug” per therapeutic class, even when others work better. Medicaid and Medicare also retrict patients from receiving reimbursed physical health and mental illness services during a single visit. HR 3717 gives physicians the right to prescribe the right medication for those on Medicare and Medicaid. It limits the ability of Medicaid programs to turn down payment when mental health services and primary care services are received within the same day.

    Background: HR 3717 Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act
    HR 3713 (introduced by Rep. Tim Murphy on 12/12/13) is the first bill to (1) focus on serious mental ‘illness’ and (2) to address multiple systemic problems in federal mental health policy that favor the largest number of the highest functioning but leave the most seriously unserved.
    Focus on treating the seriously mentally ill, not improving the mental health of all others.

    HR 3717 reorients the $204 billion US Mental Health budget towards treating the 5-8% who are most seriously mentally ill and away from loosely defined, non-evidenced based programs designed to “improve the mental health” of all others.

    HR 3717 attempts to end mission-creep by instilling mission control.

    This is the best way to improve care, reduce violence, sucide, victimization, homelessness, hospitalization, incarceration and needless tragedies. It saves money by reducing the use of hospitals and jails to serve people who can live in less expensive community settings.

    Put another way, the problem is not that we don’t spend enough, it is that we don’t spend it efficiently.

  3. I agree with Frosty, but would take it a step further. Why limit Medicaid to to new Federal level of 135% of the poverty level. There should be no limit on qualifying for Medicaid, think of all the less fortunate citizens that would then get the right thing. as Frosty said “millions of lives are saved” at the 135% level. just imagine how many more could be saved with no limit of Medicaid qualification and how many more millions and millions of dollars could be saved by the states.

  4. It’s a shame that Wyoming is one of the states not expanding Medicaid and one that does not have any “alternate” option. Studies have already been done that indicate we could be saving millions of dollars by expanding Medicaid (not to mention the lives of Wyoming citizens that could be saved). The excuse that states would be left to make up the difference is just that. An excuse. The real reason Wyoming and other states will not expand Medicaid is because they are trying to prove something to the feds, and that is that they don’t like the current administration and the ACA. All they are proving is that industry and corporate business buddies who “support” their campaigns and pocketbooks are way more important than doing the right thing for their citizens. I applaud the Republican governors and legislatures of other states who have chosen to do the right thing for their less fortunate citizens, even though it may not have been the popular choice. They have saved their states millions of dollars, but more importantly, have saved millions of lives.