So long as it’s up to Gov. Mark Gordon, a special session of the Wyoming Legislature to address the federal government’s proposed plans to stop issuing new federal coal leases in the Powder River Basin won’t be happening. 

Rep. Mark Jennings (R-Sheridan) circulated a letter amongst lawmakers last week that called on Gordon to convene a special session. Altogether, 26 lawmakers signed on, and a revised version of the letter was sent to the governor’s office Monday.

In May, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management proposed ending federal coal leasing in the Powder River Basin, which is the nation’s largest coal supplier and a longtime pillar of Wyoming’s economy. 

“This move will not only kill thousands of good-paying jobs and decimate surrounding communities,” the letter states. “It will permanently cement out-of-control inflation and energy poverty nationwide. 

“We respectfully but urgently request you to convene the Wyoming Legislature pursuant to Article 3, Section 7 of the Wyoming Constitution in order for the Legislature to appropriate funds and enlist a constitutionally-focused, proven legal team to fight Biden’s war on Wyoming the right way,” the letter states. 

After WyoFile broke the story last week, Jennings reached out to Gordon by phone to clarify that the letter was meant to be supportive of the state’s legal fight, according to Michael Pearlman, spokesperson for the governor’s office. 

The governor reiterated to Jennings during the call that Wyoming “is well-equipped to fight the battle,” Pearlman said, thanks in part to the state’s $1.2 million coal litigation fund. If additional resources become necessary, Pearlman said, the governor encouraged lawmakers to address the need in the supplemental budget during the next legislative session, which begins in January. 

Beyond the call, Pearlman said the governor would not issue a formal response to the letter. 

“My call with the Governor went very well,” Jennings, who is affiliated with the hard-line Wyoming Freedom Caucus but not a formal member, told WyoFile in an email. 

“We were hoping to send the Governor a letter of support in fighting against the overreach of the Biden administration and letting him know if he needed to call a special session to appropriate some funds, we were willing to be of help,” Jennings wrote. 

Rep. Mark Jennings (R-Sheridan) sits at his desk during the 2024 Legislative Budget session. (Ashton J. Hacke/WyoFile)

The initial letter sent to the governor was mistakenly dated May 14 — two days before the Bureau of Land Management issued its proposal — but Jennings said a corrected version has since been sent to Gordon. 

A special session isn’t completely ruled out, but it appears to be unlikely. 

Lawmakers have the ability to convene without the governor’s approval, but that would require a simple majority vote in both chambers, and the number of lawmakers who signed onto the letter fell short of that with a total of 22 representatives and four senators. 

Those who opted to sign on are members or close allies of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus. They include: Reps. Jennings, Bill Allemand (R-Midwest), Ocean Andrew (R-Laramie), Abby Angelos (R-Gillette), John Bear (R-Gillette), Jeremy Haroldson (R-Wheatland), Scott Heiner (R-Green River), Ben Hornok (R-Cheyenne), Chris Knapp (R-Gillette), Tony Locke (R-Casper), Chip Neiman (R-Hulett), Pepper Ottman (R-Riverton), Ken Pendergraft (R-Sheridan), Sarah Penn (R-Lander), Rachel Rodriguez-Williams (R-Cody), Allen Slagle (R-Newcastle), Scott Smith (R-Torrington), Tomi Strock (R-Douglas), Clarence Styvar (R-Cheyenne), Tamara Trujillo (R-Cheyenne), Jeanette Ward (R-Casper), John Winter (R-Thermopolis) and Sens. Bo Biteman (R-Ranchester), Evie Brennan (R-Cheyenne), Bob Ide (R-Casper) and Cheri Steinmetz (R-Lingle). 

“I was a little surprised that so many of the legislators didn’t bother to respond to the letter of support,” Jennings told WyoFile. 

In May, the Freedom Caucus implored Gordon in an op-ed to begin a legal fight against the BLM’s proposal, despite the state not having legal standing yet. Sixteen House members signed on to that particular letter, which also criticized the governor’s past actions. 

The BLM’s proposal completed its requisite 30-day “protest” period on Monday. A final order is due later this year. Gordon has promised to “fully utilize the opportunities to kill or modify this Record of Decision before it is signed and final.” 

Since then, Gordon directed $300,000 of the state’s coal litigation fund to the Wyoming Energy Authority to contract with entities who can assist Wyoming “in anticipation of litigation,” Gordon wrote in a May 20 letter to the agency’s director. 

In March, the Legislature also added about $1.8 million to the federal natural resource policy account, which, according to the budget bill, can be used for litigation related to “federal land, water, air, mineral and other natural resource policies that may affect the state or counties.” 

Aside from Ottman and Trujillo, all of the lawmakers who signed the special session request to Gordon voted against the budget bill. 

In March, a push by the Freedom Caucus to hold a special session to override gubernatorial vetoes failed to get enough lawmaker support. 

Gordon recently announced a town meeting scheduled for June 25 in Gillette to discuss “a barrage of proposed rules and actions by the federal government that are impacting the state’s energy industries and public lands.”

Correction: This story was updated to correct information about Rep. Penn’s district. —Ed.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. No, wyoming is NOT well equipped to fight the feds on coal. But, adding the freedumb caucus opinion to the fight would turn a losing battle into a humiliating, alternative fact, utter embarrassment of legal maneuvering into the already lost cause.

    Read the tea leaves freedumb caucus..

  2. “In May, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management proposed ending federal coal leasing in the Powder River Basin, which is the nation’s largest coal supplier and a longtime pillar of Wyoming’s economy.

    “This move will not only kill thousands of good-paying jobs and decimate surrounding communities,” the letter states. “It will permanently cement out-of-control inflation and energy poverty nationwide.”

    No coal company has asked for new leases since 2012. Obviously they don’t need them. The current leases are adequate to keep mining at current rates till 2041. But mining rates are declining so the present leases have over 20 years of mineable coal.

    Renewable energy has no fuel cost. It has the opposite effect claimed, dampening inflation and providing abundant energy. Coal, oil, and natural gas prices are subject to market changes, but renewables just have to pay the mortgage and maintenance.

  3. Again, thank you WyoFile for providing a list of those who should NOT be re-elected to the legislature. Under the guise of parental choice, this group of right wing extremists seek to get rid of public education. They don’t support workers, they don’t support schools, and they don’t support Wyoming. They huddle around sound bites from out of state organizations and pass legislation driven by people who have never been to Wyoming. Their thirst for power is unparalleled. Their care for Wyoming – non-existent.