WyoFile Energy Report

Oil and gas supervisor Grant Black resigns

— April 1, 2014

Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile editor-in-chief
Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile editor-in-chief

Less than a year on the job, Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission supervisor Grant Black agreed to resign on Monday, effective today. His resignation followed a special 2-hour executive session Monday morning. When Black was asked on Friday about the planned executive session, he’d reportedly said he had no idea what it was about.

His resignation was unanimously accepted by the five member oil and gas commission, which includes Gov. Matt Mead and is chaired by Wyoming Office of State Lands and Investments director Bridget Hill. Black did not return a request for comment.

Hours after news of the resignation, Gov. Mead issued a written statement; “The Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission plays an integral role in Wyoming – it helps safeguard public safety and health while also facilitating the responsible development of natural gas and oil, which are key to the entire country and to our economy. I thank Grant for his efforts on these matters and wish him well.”

Mark Watson will serve as interim supervisor until the position is filled. Watson is lead petroleum engineer for the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (WOGCC), and was a candidate for the supervisor position in 2013. He has a degree in petroleum engineering from the University of Wyoming and has worked at the WOGCC for about 30 years.

Black came to the WOGCC in April 2013 after an extended 8-month search process, which initially attracted only a handful of qualified candidates. The previous supervisor, Tom Doll, was forced to resign in June 2012, after Environment and Energy reporter Mike Soraghan reported comments Doll made to his colleagues regarding concerns among Pavillion area residents about tainted groundwater in the Pavillion oil and gas field. “I really believe greed is driving a lot of this,” Doll had told a meeting of fellow state regulators in Vancouver, Canada. “I think they’re just looking to be compensated.”

In the spring of 2013, Black arrived to an agency that had long been viewed by the oil and gas industry as tough but fair, and with a long list of high-priority projects. In addition to the highly contentious Pavillion groundwater investigation, the agency was being forced to finally deal with the coal-bed methane gas industry’s lingering orphan well crisis in the Powder River Basin. Multiple bankruptcies had resulted in companies abandoning hundreds of wells, threatening human health and the environment.

In Black’s first appearance before the Legislature’s Joint Minerals, Business and Economic Development interim committee, lawmakers made it clear they were not satisfied with the estimated 10-12 years it would take to properly plug and reclaim some 1,200 orphaned wells, let alone another 2,000 wells that would soon be added to the list. When Black returned to the committee in September, lawmakers were upset that he still hadn’t developed a more aggressive reclamation plan, as they’d asked.

“It was asked of you to bring to the committee a plan (to fully address this issue),” Rep. Tom Reeder (R-Casper) said in September. “We’re not experts, so we look to you. … I mean, we need a business plan. I’m very disappointed today.”

More recently, oil and gas commissioners pushed back against Black’s proposal to hold a series of “informal” meetings in anticipation of a rule-making process to update flaring, bonding, setbacks and other WOGCC standards and regulations. The landowner advocacy group, Powder River Basin Resource Council, also complained about Black’s informal meeting proposal.

“While we agree that unofficial discussion might be helpful to an agency in understanding and refining complex concepts for rulemaking, our board believes that shortcomings with the baseline water testing rulemaking may have stemmed from inconsistencies in the WOGCC’s handling of informal stakeholder comments,” PRBRC chairwoman Gillian Malone wrote in a letter to the WOGCC.

If you enjoyed this column and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS COLUMN: For details on how you can republish this column or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The commission needs to spell out what it expects of the next director … and it needs to make those expectations public.

    Reply

  2. That’s pretty much the essence of this colossal fail. In addition, Mr. Black repeatedly contradicted the Governor’s statements re: the purpose for the baseline water testing rule, never could/would say how he will enforce the rule (if at all), and showed no discernible progress in the Pavillion study, even with Encana’s millions. In the orphan well program, the governor’s office had to become the de facto Supervisor and create a program. Thank goodness Powder River (as well as industry) keep the pressure on the Commission to do their very important job.

    Reply