The Park County commissioners are taking a hard line with data centers, in large part after hearing overwhelming public sentiment in opposition and due to simply not knowing enough about potential issues. 

The concerns about data centers have been a big topic recently, especially in southeastern Wyoming as the Cheyenne area has seen dozens of the large centers being built or in various stages of planning in the last few years. 

While Gov. Mark Gordon recently came out opposed to a moratorium at the state level, a number of primary election candidates have expressed opposition to any more data centers being built. 

“As governor, I do not support any state-mandated moratorium on building data centers in Wyoming,” Gordon wrote in part in a recent column. “The job of deciding whether to encourage the building of data centers falls, as it should, on the more than capable shoulders of our local communities within the constraints allowed by the Legislature. As with most development, it is the communities, counties, and local boards who do the heavy lifting in economic opportunity.”

Park County is taking up that mantle. As commissioners hashed out last week in updating development standards and regulations ahead of an adoption draft to take before the public, heavy-load electric users would be permitted nowhere in the county without a special-use permit — which requires public hearings. 

Data centers would not be allowed at all in most areas, however, including smaller residential and commercial zones. Commissioners are only proposing centers be allowed with a special-use permit in the county’s General Rural 20-and 35-acre zones and industrial zones. 

“At this time, based on public input and just the unknown, the recommendation [from the consultant] is to more widely prohibit them as opposed to allow,” Planning Director Joy Hill told commissioners during a work session last week. “The other thing is that it’s understood that we don’t really have the power and water sources potentially in Park County. I can’t confirm that. I don’t know the power needs. I know they can create their own power. I don’t know how much water they need and how often. I could not tell you. I do not have enough factual information about data centers generally to feel comfortable even advising you.

“I don’t think generally the public is favoring them.”

Commissioner Scott Mangold said as data centers are currently set up, Park County wouldn’t be a desirable place for one anyway, as he said the county doesn’t have the infrastructure to get one set up. 

“Now, if they become smaller or if they discover they can put them out in space, that’ll be fine, but for now the actual way the data centers are set up right now, Park County is not a good place for them,” he said. 

While that may be, Commissioner Lloyd Thiel said he’d still prefer some ability to at least apply, to which Mangold agreed, saying an outright ban could lead to the situation the commissioners found themselves in when they blocked a cell tower in the Wapiti Valley after an outpouring of community opposition. The cell tower company sued and won a court case, forcing the county to accept the tower. 

“I don’t think eliminating completely is the answer,” Thiel said. 

Hill said she didn’t know if that would even be legal to fully ban them, and also brought up the fact of property rights. 

“We have the property rights issue too,” she said. “If there’s somebody with 3,000, 5,000, 10,000 acres and they want to sell that to a [data center] company, will they have to go through the process? Absolutely. But would they have a right to do it?”

With the commissioners’ determination, there would be a path for a developer to build a data center in certain areas of the county, but the proposal would have to pass public, and commissioner, scrutiny.

Zac Taylor is editor of the Powerll Tribune. He graduated from Metropolitan State University of Denver with a degree in journalism and has worked at newspapers in Georgia, Colorado and Wyoming. He enjoys...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *