Once upon a time, there was an ambitious blonde girl named Cheneylocks. She came from a royal family, and her daddy was once the second-most powerful man in the forest.


One dark and stormy night, on her way to the White Palace, Cheneylocks lost her way in the forest and stumbled upon a cabin. She was tired after many hours of walking, and happy to find a cozy room with three beds.

“I think I could live here forever!” said a giddy Cheneylocks. “Or at least until something better comes along.”

She started to climb into the biggest bed but was startled to find an obese orange bear occupying it. No longer the ruler of the forest, he sure acted like he was. A sore loser, he told his followers to prevent anyone from ever taking his place, even if it meant burning down the rest of the forest and their own homes.

“This bed is disgusting,” Cheneylocks cried, then threw off the covers of the second bed. It was filled with many bears, but she instantly recognized them as good friends, so she eagerly hopped on.

Imagine her surprise when Cheneylocks heard the bears growl at her to leave and never return. “You’re a disgrace, and you’ve dishonored our king!” one shouted as they tossed her to the ground.

“Well, I know when I’m not welcome,” said a crestfallen Cheneylocks. She looked at the third bed, hoping she might still get a good rest. But she was horrified to realize the bears peeking out from under the covers were mortal enemies of her family.

Then she overheard the bears loudly whisper, and Cheneylocks felt a change of heart in the air. Some still couldn’t stand her, but others heartily asked her to join them. One motioned to the first bed and said, “A lot of us hate the ‘king’ over there way more than your father. You can stay here with us.”

Cheneylocks considered her options. “They like me, they really like me!” she reasoned. “Maybe they’ll give me a place to rest so I can continue my journey to the White Palace where I belong.”

For a fortnight, it seemed as though the girl and her new bear friends were getting along. But then she told them that she believed female bears aren’t fit to make their own reproductive or healthcare decisions. The pro-choice bears threw her out of the cabin and she was never seen again.

The moral of this fable is not, as you might suspect, that politics makes strange bedfellows. It’s that one Wyoming political race is so crazy, it has sent the teller of this tall tale right off the deep end.

I think it’s safe to say the vast majority of Wyoming Democrats thought they’d never, under any circumstances, vote for Republican Liz Cheney. 

And many still feel that way, even if they believe the congresswoman is honorable for her quest to hold former President Donald Trump accountable for trying to stage a political coup.

I’m not naming those I’m about to quote, because most offered their opinions to me unsolicited and off the record. But unlike my fable, what they told me is real. 

“I think what she’s doing to Trump is great, but she’s a hypocrite,” a Democrat told me. “Yes, he belongs in prison. But she’s never done anything but defend her father [former Vice President Dick Cheney], who should be behind bars for war crimes [in Iraq].”

But for every Democrat who’s told me thinking about voting for Cheney makes them sick, there are at least five who admire her defense of the Constitution and the rule of law.

Here’s a typical response: “I don’t agree with anything else she’s done, but I respect her for voting to impeach [Trump] and trying to bring him to justice.”

“A lot of people ask me how I can stand becoming a Republican and voting for Cheney,” a smiling Democrat said. “But I will do it for five minutes, and I’ll actually enjoy it.”

The Cheney contest is filled with many political firsts in the Equality State. It must be the first time a former president didn’t endorse a candidate who supported more than 90% of his positions.

Instead, Trump blessed Cheney’s primary opponent, Harriet Hageman, even though as a Wyoming delegate to the 2016 Republican National Convention she tried to derail his presidential nomination. Hageman called him “racist” and “xenophobic,” which shows she’s not always wrong.

Another first is that Cheney’s 2020 opponent, Democrat Lynnette Grey Bull, told WyoFile if she hadn’t decided to seek her party’s nomination this year, she would likely have crossed over to vote for Cheney over Hageman. Though she knows her chances of winning will “take a hit” if her own supporters switch, she understands their motivation.

In a February New York Times interview, Cheney dismissed the possibility she would ask Democrats to change parties and vote for her.

“That is not something that I have contemplated, that I have organized or that I will organize,” she said.

Last week, the consummate conservative changed her mind, sending a mailer to Wyoming Democrats explaining how to switch parties. They can make the change when they ask for an absentee ballot, at their county clerk’s office up until 14 days before the primary, and even at the polls on election day.

While I believed her initial response, I didn’t understand how she could afford to not ask Democrats to cross over. While Hageman and other opponents attacked her about-face as a sign of desperation, I was surprised Cheney didn’t do it sooner. 

Cheney didn’t make any apologies; she doubled-down. “I encourage everyone with principles who loves our country to exercise their right to vote,” she told the Washington Post. “And, damn right, I will continue to give every voter in Wyoming a list of all the key rules for casting ballots in our state. If any eligible voter living in Wyoming wishes to become a Republican, they are free to do so. That is their right.”

But what happened last Friday significantly decreases the chances many will do so, particularly progressives. When Roe v. Wade was overturned, Cheney tweeted, “I have always been strongly pro-life. Today’s ruling by the Supreme Court returns power to the states and the people of the states to address the issue of abortion under state law.”

No one should be shocked by Cheney’s position, which she has long held. Yet for many of the Democratic and independent voters she needs to become temporary Republicans, it’s a bridge too far. Yes, Cheney stood up to Trump for inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection, but she also fully endorsed his three anti-abortion Supreme Court appointments that made reversing Roe possible. 

So, what difference does it make to Wyoming’s pro-choice voters whether Cheney or Hageman is elected, if neither represents their views about a fundamental constitutional right? 

“Oh God. It was going so well, Liz,” a disillusioned man tweeted. 

There was this instant response from a woman confident she was right all along: “Some of y’all can quit making Liz Cheney your damn freedom fighter right now.”

I believe Cheney’s path to a primary victory requires three elements — splitting the far-right vote, a steady decline in Trump’s base, and thousands of non-Republicans voting for Cheney. I think the first two are still possible, and unlike many observers, I’m not writing Cheney off. But if the latter leg of the stool splinters, the sturdiness of the others may not matter.

Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake has covered Wyoming for more than four decades, previously as a reporter and editor for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle and Casper Star-Tribune. He lives in Cheyenne and...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I disagree. She couldn’t, because she’d get no out-0f-state money and Hageman would be flooded with it.

    If we had democracy, election to office would depend upon the candidate’s qualifications and stances on individual issues. But under our current system of partisan gang rule, a politician has to be incredibly well established, and state laws have to have real restrictions (not toothless, unenforced ones) on outside partisan political money, before he or she can win and keep statewide office as an independent. There are two independents each in the US House and US Senate, one in the Wyoming House, and zero in the Wyoming Senate. IT SHOULD NOT BE THIS WAY, but the parties have stacked the deck. We currently do not live in a democracy.

  2. This entire mess is merely a manifestation of a bigger problem: Here in the US, we have not a democracy, not a republic, but gang rule. Two ruthless, power-hungry gangs control ballot access, the operation of legislatures, political money, the conduct of elections, and the media. Politicians have no choice, except in a vanishingly few special cases, to throw in with one of those gangs.

    We in Wyoming once had an independent spirit and balked at outside control. We bristled at being told how to live our lives, or what to think, by outside groups or the Federal government. But due to the advent of partisan media (Faux News, NewsHacks, etc.) and social media rabbit holes (especially but not limited to Facebook), we’ve lost that spirit. To the point where most Wyomingites belong to the ruling gang whose state chairman is a member of a domestic terrorist organization and was at least nearby (we do not know to what extent he participated) when that group led an attempted coup to overthrow our nation’s government. We need to reclaim our government from these two gangs and restore democracy… at which point we may perhaps get candidates who support our state’s actual values. (For example, most Wyomingites, even very conservative ones, believe in individual liberty and hence are pro-choice. But we have a “trigger law” due to partisan pols marching in lockstep with a gang from out of state that demands total submission to a national agenda.) Neither Cheney nor Hageman reflects Wyoming values (though there is a very slim chance that Cheney will buck her party a bit more if elected). But we won’t get a candidate who does unless we dethrone these two gangs.

  3. If Liz opted to run as independent right now, like the Alaska senator did and won, she could beat Hageman.

  4. Liz Cheney’s views on abortion no longer matter because Wyoming’s trigger law has already been triggered by the Supreme Court decision to abolish Roe v. Wade.. Probably Liz and Harriet share the same views on many subjects, and until Trump tried to steal the election, Liz was with him. .But if Liz is really on the side of right and truth she will also question the fact that all three Supreme Court Justices appointed by Trump lied in their confirmation hearings about overturning settled law. Look it up: you can hear them lying in their teeth on your phone. Lies are lies; whether about elections or overthrowing Roe vs Wade. Get on it, Liz !

  5. Great piece, Kerry, starting with a fable & ending with an incisive political analysis. You capture such an interesting political event in such an important time for the country. Nothing about it is simple! Many thanks.
    Charlie Thomson

  6. I won’t be voting for Cheney – I’ll be voting against the divisive hard right. If that requires a check in the Cheney box, so be it. I’ll be temporarily switching parties at the ballot box to do it. We don’t have a viable alternative in Wyoming.

  7. Much barnyard excrement from male bovines shall pass through the big floor fan between now and August 17. We would all be well advised to stay out of the slipstream.

  8. Kerry — Good summary of this ironic situation we Wyoming Democrats find ourselves in. I’ve never been a fan of the Cheney brand, and if I switch parties and vote for Liz to reward her for being one of the few Republicans to support the principles of our democratic republic, I’m still a flaming liberal to the most of the Wyoming GOP.
    Strange times.

  9. sorry Kerry – you’re missing the point. The non-Republican support for Cheney has never been based on her politics. She’s voted the Trump agenda some 98% of the time! It’s her consistent and principled support for the foundations of democracy and the sanctity of the vote that wins her votes from those who oppose her politics. She is not, never has been, and never will be a supporter of the Democratic Party platform. And that too is a principled stand on her part.
    The 2022 Primary Election is the opportunity for Wyoming Republicans to do their patriotic duty to save our government of, by, and for the people from the vandalism of Donald Trump. They deserve the support of all loyal Americans in that struggle, and we can worry about the individual policies later.

  10. Harriet as already took the path of least resistance just like are other two representatives. It’s amassing how all these republicans changed their opinion prior to trumps election during his administration and after the attack.They are all spineless.