Do you support Wyoming Public Radio?

A mostly GOP-led movement to cut federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, if successful, could trim some $288,000 from Wyoming Public Media’s annual budget. That’s about 15 percent of WPM’s budget, and it would force the organization to make immediate cuts in the services it provides throughout Wyoming. Rep. Cynthia Lummis, (R-Wyoming) voted to suspend funding of CPB and said she supports the cut as a way of addressing the nation’s shrinking budget and staggering debt. But given the partisan split on the House measure to cut CPB funding, and the actual debt-savings it would provide compared to other national budget items, some people say it’s clear the action is more ideologically driven than economically driven.

In a recent interview with WyoFile, Wyoming Public Media general manager Jon Schwartz said “This House bill that passed is, in an ironic way, is helpful in that it made clear this is a partisan attack on public radio alone.”

Wyoming Public Radio enjoys overwhelming listener support in Wyoming compared to public radio in other states, said Schwartz. Radio is particularly important in a rural state where people spend hours driving across rural spaces with only radio available for entertainment and news. National Public Radio has long been a target for the extreme Right, and recent dust-ups over the firing of Juan Williams and an under-cover video by right-wing activist James O’Keefe have intensified criticism of National Public Radio as too left-leaning in its reporting. Is that criticism fair?

WyoFile would like to hear from both Wyoming Public Radio supporters and critics. Will you support Wyoming Public Radio this year? Why or why not? Please give us your thoughts, and WyoFile will follow up with a report on the potential cuts to Wyoming Public Radio and what it means to citizens of Wyoming.

– Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile editor-in-chief

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *